Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush supreme court pick 8 a.m

Posted on 10/03/2005 3:25:16 AM PDT by johnmecainrino

supreme court 8 a.m


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: badchoice; bush43; bushbetrayal; bushsfamilyfriend; demspickedher; judicialnominees; miers; miersdonatedtodems; notscalia; notthomas; robertscourt; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-393 next last
To: newzjunkey

What makes Meiers a bad pick?


81 posted on 10/03/2005 4:12:49 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

When Rhenquist was appointed to the Court, he never had experience as a judge, according to CNN.


82 posted on 10/03/2005 4:12:57 AM PDT by Peach (Go Yankees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

E.D. Hill cited Carl Cameron, not the AP, when announcing Miers as the pick.


83 posted on 10/03/2005 4:13:00 AM PDT by Terpfen (http://www.pattonhq.com/unknowntext.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

There was a leak for Roberts about one hour before his July 19th announcement. So this Miers thing may be for real. After all, if no other nominee has arrived at the White House gate, then the nominee must be someone that works inside. I'm sure there are people watching where these people are physically located.


84 posted on 10/03/2005 4:13:00 AM PDT by ChronicMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Why is she a bad choice?

That's what I'd like to know.

85 posted on 10/03/2005 4:13:01 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

So much for the report that the pick flew in last night. She was at the Red Mass yesterday.


86 posted on 10/03/2005 4:13:07 AM PDT by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

You don't exhibit enough "rage" at the President already? You coulda fooled me.

Here's the deal. I'd swap the pathological Bush haters on here for Harriet Miers any day.

As long as the President can establish to me, a reasonable person, that she has the judicial philosophy he has promised his picks will have, I will have an..."ok, I'll just wait and see about her, Mr. President" attitude.

She is not my pick, just to be clear. But I am not the President. (Neither are the Bush haters, to my great relief and delight).


87 posted on 10/03/2005 4:13:30 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Almost anyone else would make me nervous...

Harriet Miers.

Whoever it really turns out to be, I doubt it will be someone to make most of us happy.  GWB isn't all that easy to anticipate.  He likes to spring his little surprises.

88 posted on 10/03/2005 4:13:30 AM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PilloryHillary

She has NO JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE

President Bush on November 17 named Harriet Miers as White House counsel, a position she will hold upon the Senate confirmation of Alberto Gonzales -- current White House counsel -- as U.S. Attorney General.

Most recently, Miers served as Assistant to the President and Staff Secretary. Prior to that, she was Co-Managing Partner at Locke Liddell & Sapp, LLP. Previously, she was President of Locke, Purnell, Rain & Harrell, where she worked from 1972 until 1999. From 1995 until 2000, she was chair of the Texas Lottery Commission. In 1992, Harriet became the first woman president of the Texas State Bar, and in 1985 she became the first woman president of the Dallas Bar Association. She also served as a Member-At-Large on the Dallas City Council. Harriet received both her undergraduate and law degrees from Southern Methodist University.

89 posted on 10/03/2005 4:14:04 AM PDT by newzjunkey (CA: Stop union theft for political agendas with YES on Prop 75!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Well, I guess GWB doesn't need to make the announcement, it's already been leaked.


90 posted on 10/03/2005 4:14:08 AM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Peach
experience as a judge

I contend that such experience is not necessary, except for the dems who want some written opinions to go by (which we would probably like as well, for the comfort factor).

91 posted on 10/03/2005 4:15:37 AM PDT by Bahbah (Call Chuckie Schumer @ 202-224-6542 for your FREE credit report)heh-heh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
She has NO JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE

And this is bad why..? :)

92 posted on 10/03/2005 4:15:44 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Good!


93 posted on 10/03/2005 4:16:24 AM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

It's amazing to me how so many people claim to be experts on the judiciary. I have NO idea who would be a good pick. I am pretty sure President Bush isn't going to tap the ACLU for a judge, so I think I will just go along with his judgement.


94 posted on 10/03/2005 4:16:25 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ChronicMA

Miers donated to Lloyd Bentsen in 1987, and Al Gore and the DNC in 1988. Since then, all GOP.

http://www.newsmeat.com/washington_political_donations/Harriet_Miers.php


95 posted on 10/03/2005 4:16:35 AM PDT by ChronicMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette; Miss Marple; tsmith130; Peach
Miers bio

She's a WILD CARD and this smacks of cronyism.

96 posted on 10/03/2005 4:16:55 AM PDT by newzjunkey (CA: Stop union theft for political agendas with YES on Prop 75!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Neither did William Rehnquist have judicial experience, if you mean being a judge. Have you got that, or can you get that through your hysterical, knee-jerk, Bush-bashing head?


97 posted on 10/03/2005 4:17:19 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
She has NO JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE

Good, now why should this be deemed a negative rather than a potential, and probable, positive?

98 posted on 10/03/2005 4:17:30 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I am pretty sure President Bush isn't going to tap the ACLU for a judge...

Or the 9th Circus :)

99 posted on 10/03/2005 4:17:37 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
She has NO JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE

Neither does Ann Coulter, and I can't count on both hands the times I have seen her name bantied around.

100 posted on 10/03/2005 4:18:24 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Don't Get Stuck On Stupid!" - Lieutenant General Russell "Ragin' Cajun" Honore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson