Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medieval Ancestors Measured Up To Our Height Standards
The Times/British Archaeology ^ | 9-19-2005 | Norman Hammond

Posted on 09/19/2005 3:32:59 PM PDT by blam

September 19, 2005

Notebook: Archeology

Medieval ancestors measured up to our height standards

By Norman Hammond, Archaeology Correspondent

OUR ANCESTORS were as tall as we are, contrary to popular belief. Over the past five millennia the average height of men in Britain has remained stable at about 170cm (5ft 7in), and that of women at 160cm (5ft 3in). We may be surprised at how small the armour worn by the Black Prince or King Henry V was, but such giants on the battlefield were not physically large and were towered over by contemporaries of all classes.

“The enduring myth that people in the past were much shorter than we are today contains a small element of truth,” writes Sebastian Payne, chief scientist at English Heritage, in British Archaeology. “There have been small changes, and average height has increased by an inch or so over the past 50 years,” he says, attributing the increase to better health and nutrition.

The myth seems to stem from such things as low doorways on some medieval houses, and the small suits of clothes and armour in museums. But Dr Payne says that there are plenty of tall doors, and we simply don’t register “normally” sized outfits. “Recruits in 18th and 19th-century military records were considerably below today’s average heights,” he says, but adds: “Recruits are often from poorer families whose average height is less, and were often not fully grown.”

In the abandoned medieval village of Wharram Percy in Yorkshire, the churchyard has yielded hundreds of skeletons for analysis. There “ten-year-olds were around 8in shorter than children today: by the time they were fully grown they were nearly as tall as modern adults”.

A study by Charlotte Roberts and Margaret Cox, drawing together evidence of stature from skeletons across the country, shows that adult heights in both sexes have remained constant since the Neolithic era.

British Archaeology No 84: 51


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ancestors; godsgravesglyphs; height; history; measured; medieval; our; standards; up
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last
To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

Just a possibility. I've seen the uniforms of Audie Murphy, from World War II, and Confederate General Wheeler. They were both about the size of my 14-year-old daughter, about 5'2", maybe 110 pounds soaking wet.

There was a fluff in the filmmaking community when the recent movie of "Cold Mountain" used Romanian Army reservists as Civil War extras, but the producers pointed out that American reenactors are almost all too big, too old, too clean, and have too many teeth to be anything like realistic :-).


41 posted on 09/19/2005 5:23:34 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Start the revolution - I'll bring the tea and muffins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Post-Neolithic

I had a good laugh when I went through Windsor Castle and saw the armor made for Henry VIII’s portly size.

I don’t recall Henry leading his troops into battle so the armor was no doubt ceremonial. Like Clinton, he was too busy with the ladies to bother about war.


42 posted on 09/19/2005 5:24:32 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Sword hell, I'm counting on a gunfight where big ol' boys like that just have larger organs that are easier to perforate.
43 posted on 09/19/2005 5:25:09 PM PDT by Melas (The dumber the troll, the longer the thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
"But seriously, go to any museum and see the outfits people wore in history and try making the same claim. Were this true, short shorts made their appearance eons ago, and some outfits would have been like thongs on the wearer."

Keep in mind the clothing most likely to survive to be in a museum was clothing the heirs had no use for. If the clothes fit others it would have been worn until it was worn out. Smaller clothes might have had a better chance, statistically, to survive. Just a thought

44 posted on 09/19/2005 5:30:04 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoDak
"Wow, 5'7 is the average? I'm 6'6 and I generally think of guys under 6 ft as being overly short.

Have you ever been to Korea? You'd be a freak over there. I remember riding a bus there once and I felt like I was a NBA star.....and I'm only 5-11.

45 posted on 09/19/2005 5:31:25 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

I'd question that figure. The requirement to be Roman Cavalry was 5'8", so legionaires would have a considerably lesser requirement.


46 posted on 09/19/2005 5:33:41 PM PDT by Melas (The dumber the troll, the longer the thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SoDak

Well, there is tallness on both sides of my family...my dad was the short guy at 5'10"...my brother was 6'7"...my mothers brother was 6'2"...my mom herself was 5'8"...all my male cousins on both my mom and my dads side were at least 6' tall...I am the short lady, being only 5'6"

So I was always used to being around tall men, and would not even date a guy shorter than 6'...luckily for me, my hubby is 6'2"....our older boy died after just turning 15, from leukemia, but by then he was already 5'11"...my younger boy is 6'5"

What I find unusual is my hubbys family...they are all from Sicily...I had always thought that Sicilian and Italian men were short, but not in my hubbys family...his dad, and all his uncles are over 6'...even the old grandfather was over 6' tall...

I like em tall...


47 posted on 09/19/2005 5:35:52 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Gads, I didn’t realize that Audie Murphy and General Wheeler were so short. Audie Murphy looked short, but I didn’t know HOW short. No wonder the Germans couldn’t zero in on him and shoot him. He was a mere speck in the distance.

Thank you about that information on the movie "Cold Mountain" and why Romanians were used. I found that interesting. And yes, the Romanians don’t have good dental care as well as other folks in that area of the world.


48 posted on 09/19/2005 5:36:09 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: blam
In the abandoned medieval village of Wharram Percy in Yorkshire, the churchyard has yielded hundreds of skeletons for analysis. There “ten-year-olds were around 8in shorter than children today

Ahem.

But that is the average height of kids so unhealthy--and so likely stunted--as to die at ten.

49 posted on 09/19/2005 5:36:33 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Recruits are often from poorer families whose average height is less, and were often not fully grown.

Um, weren't the great majority of people poor?

50 posted on 09/19/2005 5:39:59 PM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom

I am very sorry to read about your son.

God bless you and your family.


51 posted on 09/19/2005 5:40:33 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
I didn’t realize that Audie Murphy and General Wheeler were so short.

They were little - short, and small-framed, and strong without being bulky. Made me feel enormous, and I'm 5'4", under 120 lbs. (between babies).

It's a trial for historical costumers, because uniforms of say, the WWI era, have to be cut very differently from the originals if today's actors or reenactors are going to wear them. You can't just make the old patterns bigger, because the shoulders will be too tight, sleeves too narrow, etc. People are not only bigger than a few generations ago, but shaped differently.

52 posted on 09/19/2005 5:42:37 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Start the revolution - I'll bring the tea and muffins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

Thanks for your kind thoughts...


53 posted on 09/19/2005 5:43:43 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom

I always find it amazing how different people can be. You're 5'6", and wouldn't date a guy under 6'. My wife is 6', and married 5'1" me. Her father who's 6'6" or 6'7" still suspects that I'm "ethnic".


54 posted on 09/19/2005 5:49:50 PM PDT by Melas (The dumber the troll, the longer the thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Mostly fatter. I don't think modern Americans grasp just how sinewy and lean people were before all the modern advances that allow us to put on pounds with such ease.


55 posted on 09/19/2005 5:51:11 PM PDT by Melas (The dumber the troll, the longer the thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Melas
That's true. I sometimes wonder what it would be like to not have too much food!
56 posted on 09/19/2005 5:53:31 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Start the revolution - I'll bring the tea and muffins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

xenalyte is how tall? 5'10"


57 posted on 09/19/2005 5:54:14 PM PDT by agincourt1415 (Democrats still lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Thats wonderful...we all have our preferences in life, preferences as to who we would date or not date...even tho I am a blond, I dont believe I ever dated a guy who was blonde...I just preferred 'dark' men...

My very tall son, usually dates gals who are under 5'3"...that is just how it works out with him...


58 posted on 09/19/2005 5:55:47 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

“It's a trial for historical costumers, because uniforms of say, the WWI era, have to be cut very differently from the originals if today's actors or reenactors are going to wear them. You can't just make the old patterns bigger, because the shoulders will be too tight, sleeves too narrow, etc. People are not only bigger than a few generations ago, but shaped differently.”

That is interesting. Now that you have pointed that out, yes, the skeletal structure appears to be different. Could we say that the skeletal structure is bigger? (“bigger”…lack of a better word).


59 posted on 09/19/2005 5:56:08 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

Me too at 5'10", and I'm a woman.


60 posted on 09/19/2005 5:57:50 PM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson