Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
I didn’t realize that Audie Murphy and General Wheeler were so short.

They were little - short, and small-framed, and strong without being bulky. Made me feel enormous, and I'm 5'4", under 120 lbs. (between babies).

It's a trial for historical costumers, because uniforms of say, the WWI era, have to be cut very differently from the originals if today's actors or reenactors are going to wear them. You can't just make the old patterns bigger, because the shoulders will be too tight, sleeves too narrow, etc. People are not only bigger than a few generations ago, but shaped differently.

52 posted on 09/19/2005 5:42:37 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Start the revolution - I'll bring the tea and muffins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

Mostly fatter. I don't think modern Americans grasp just how sinewy and lean people were before all the modern advances that allow us to put on pounds with such ease.


55 posted on 09/19/2005 5:51:11 PM PDT by Melas (The dumber the troll, the longer the thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

“It's a trial for historical costumers, because uniforms of say, the WWI era, have to be cut very differently from the originals if today's actors or reenactors are going to wear them. You can't just make the old patterns bigger, because the shoulders will be too tight, sleeves too narrow, etc. People are not only bigger than a few generations ago, but shaped differently.”

That is interesting. Now that you have pointed that out, yes, the skeletal structure appears to be different. Could we say that the skeletal structure is bigger? (“bigger”…lack of a better word).


59 posted on 09/19/2005 5:56:08 PM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick
You can't just make the old patterns bigger, because the shoulders will be too tight, sleeves too narrow, etc.

These are military uniforms, right? That would make them very authentic. Too small, too big, too tight or too loose. Never just right.

83 posted on 09/19/2005 7:57:52 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

Re: the clothes being differently proportioned as well as smaller, my grandmother told me that when she immigrated here from Ireland, her friends over here warned her not to bring much clothing to America, because after six months, it would not fit. Sure enough, she said, after being in the US for less than half-a-year, she had to buy all new clothes.


100 posted on 09/19/2005 9:58:58 PM PDT by VietVet (I am old enough to know who I am and what I believe, and I 'm not inclined to apologize for any of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick
It's a trial for historical costumers, because uniforms of say, the WWI era, have to be cut very differently from the originals if today's actors or reenactors are going to wear them.

Hubby and I collect WWI & WWII items. The WWI uniforms are TINY...oddly so (we have quite a few). I'm 5'4"; 125 lbs; and can barely get my arms and shoulders into the mens' uniforms.

Occasionally, at a very large show we will see a larger-sized uniform; they are so rare they command $1000, or so.

Even the larger sized WWII uniforms are more expensive, as most are what we would consider a small or medium today.

HOWEVER, I have WWI & WWII Red Cross nurse uniforms that fit me perfectly. I think that mens' frames have changed far more than those of women.

103 posted on 09/20/2005 12:05:09 AM PDT by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

Other than the uniforms it is hard to find pictures of troops with their cloths off until WW II. There were a bunch of pictures of the Civil War prisoners but they had been starved.

There is one picture of a British Infantry unit on the move in the desert of Iraq in WW I. They are wearing shorts and just walking along at a good pace. That picture has the biggest collection of "Twiggy" like bird legs I've every viewed in one place.


106 posted on 09/20/2005 4:02:23 AM PDT by PeteB570
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

Hey, TC! Fancy meeting you here!


128 posted on 09/20/2005 11:28:18 AM PDT by Monkey Face (Do the voices in my head bother you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson