Posted on 06/28/2005 3:40:00 AM PDT by Smile-n-Win
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice and participants in the Free State Project among others.
Who's got an in to Hannity? Send the link to this thread to him.
You have a good idea .. maybe we should do that to ALL OF THEM AND SEE HOW THEY RESPOND.
Great idea .. can you find out where all these homes are and maybe we can find people in each city to take the law to these people who think it's okay to take property away.
LOL!
Hey, thanks!
Hope any one of the thousands they'll receive will make them rise to the opportunity...;)
Yes, it is. He needs a corporate entity in the development and construction business. A publishing company wouldn't be appropriate, and an individual would have no standing at all.
A land far far away with voteing booths thats only far away if you don't have an SUV to get there in... A land where not securing your seat belt in that SUV, makes you a BAD PERSON..
A land that...... {snip}
Oh the irony!!!
Perfect!
Here's the letter I just sent to one of their Selectmen:
Dear [Selectman]:
I understand that a developer, Mr. Logan Clements, has started the process with your city's Selectmen to discuss taking the property on 34 Cilley Hill Road in order to build a theme hotel there. My husband and I have been talking about taking a vacation to New Hampshire for years (we are on the West Coast, but he has family back east, so we could make a tour of it), and we would certainly be interested in staying in such an interesting and pertinent theme hotel as Mr. Clements proposes. I hope you will give due consideration to his plan. I'm sure it would be an asset to the area.
Yours sincerely,
xxx
Praise G*d and pass the popcorn!
Thank you 41st prez for selecting him, this is your legacy....will you go down in history as one of the worst president's America ever elected????
Any jurist that rules against the ORGANIC CONSTITUTION then it becomes time to IMPEACH each and everyone of them!!!!
With 20/20 hindsight conservatives should have filed this against each of the liberal members of the court. They would then have had to recuse themselves from the decision.
Perfect.
Shhhhh. Let's keep this idea low key, here.
/just kidding.
"I think it is exactly what should be done."
I agree. We need to get the leftists' land before they get our's. The winner of this land race will be the one who buys-sells faster.
How about adding a Colonic Spa
Top 10 Things to do with the Homes of Darth Bader Ginsberg /Stevens /
Kennedy/Breyer/Souter, based on Social Need and Tax Potential
10. Hooters
9. Exxon Station w/Diesel Pumps
8. Adult Novelty Shop
7. Homeless Camp
6. Brew Pub
5. U-Pick Auto Parts
4. Indoor Pistol & Shotgun Range
3. Donate to the C.S. Lewis Foundation (that'd piss em off)
2. Cabella's Outlet
1. Walmart
Its kill or be killed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.