Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek apologizes for getting Koran-Guantanamo Bay story wrong. (The Editor's Desk)
Newsweek ^ | 05/15/05 | The Editor's Desk

Posted on 05/15/2005 10:31:22 AM PDT by Pikamax

May 23 issue - Did a report in NEWSWEEK set off a wave of deadly anti-American riots in Afghanistan? That's what numerous news accounts suggested last week as angry Afghans took to the streets to protest reports, linked to us, that U.S. interrogators had desecrated the Qur'an while interrogating Muslim terror suspects. We were as alarmed as anyone to hear of the violence, which left at least 15 Afghans dead and scores injured. But I think it's important for the public to know exactly what we reported, why, and how subsequent events unfolded.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agitprop; antiamericanism; apology; blowmenewsweek; bullzogby; cya; gitmo; guantanamo; islamofascism; korandesecration; lyingliars; mediabias; medialies; newsweakliedppldied; newsweek; newsweekliedppldied; newsweekmurders; propaganda; provokeddeadlyriots; religionofpeace; riot; rop; serveditspurpose; thenewsweekmurders; theythinkitisagame; toolittletoolate; yellingfireinacinema; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 441-457 next last
To: AFPhys

I can't imagine a quicker way to get them to clean up their act than wartime censorship and a few arrests for treason.

#1 on the list: Bill Moyers and his buddies at PBS and NPR. #2: All involved in taking away effective tools and techniques from our interrogators at Abu Ghraib, Gitmo and Afghanistan.


341 posted on 05/15/2005 10:45:38 PM PDT by MaryInSacto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Smartass
"You know, there's a definitive distinction between a declaration of war and an undeclared war.

Yes, I know

But if I recall correctly .. at the time, many in Congress did not want to go on record for declaring war .. and many did not want to give Bush the Powers of going to war

342 posted on 05/15/2005 11:09:28 PM PDT by Mo1 (Hey GOP ---- Not one Dime till Republicans grow a Spine !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21

Newsweek should be hauled into court for this stunt. Their stupidity and bias has caused loss of human life. Treasonous action


343 posted on 05/15/2005 11:48:35 PM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
People were going to die because of the story, not the facts.

This is very true. However, there's a difference between yelling "Fire" in the ol'crowded theater when there actually is a fire, and when there is none. The first could be justified as a sincere attempt to save lives, even if more lives were ultimately lost because of a stampede; the second is clearly just malicious.

That said, I can't imagine any compelling interest for Newsweek to publish the story even if it had been true, since they must have been aware of the consequences of such a story. However, the fact that it was not true, they published it on the vaguest of rumors and that anybody who worked around Gitmo would have known that those rumors could probably be traced back to Islamist propaganda in the first place, makes it at least gross negligence, I would think. But I don't know whether there is actually any way of prosecuting them or suing them; I suspect not.

Still, I think Isikoff should have to go to Afghanistan and apologize, both to the Afghanis and to our military, and Newsweek should have to pay some sort of compensation to the families of the people who were killed. It might make our "news" sources think twice about doing something like this again in the future.

Mass communications are too effective nowadays to let media sources sit around and casually launch rumors as if they were tossing paper airplanes. Something can now go from the desk of a Bush-hater in NY or DC to primitive rioters in the streets of Afghanistan in a matter of hours.

344 posted on 05/16/2005 3:29:09 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
A good summary and analysis at this link:

WorldNet Daily

345 posted on 05/16/2005 4:02:42 AM PDT by lonevoice (Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

In many Muslim countries mere possession of a Bible is a serious offense.

Actually I beleive that only true in Saudi Arabia


346 posted on 05/16/2005 4:09:58 AM PDT by Valin (The glass is 1/32 full! - The incredible optimist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: livius

Reply 265
"As others have pointed out the damage has been done, now how do we (or more specifically newsweek) fix it.
Write and have printed (at newsweek cost) a retaction and have it placed in EVERY paper in the Islamic world. That might be a place to start."


347 posted on 05/16/2005 4:15:20 AM PDT by Valin (The glass is 1/32 full! - The incredible optimist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...

C-span's WJ is about to take calls on this..............


348 posted on 05/16/2005 4:24:24 AM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax; All

Interesting how this story breaks in the same month people are re-opening the Emmett Till case. Didn't he die because an unsubstantiated, sensationalistic report inflamed local passions? What is the prevailing public opinion of the people who spread THAT story? Should our opinion of Newsweek be any different?

Is there any record of Fox News EVER having done anything like this?

No, I didn't think so.


349 posted on 05/16/2005 4:25:44 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
I can't find ANY reference to this on Al-Jazeera.


I'm shocked!! /sarc
350 posted on 05/16/2005 4:29:32 AM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Oops....sorry, there is something...... Magazine casts doubt on Quran report
351 posted on 05/16/2005 4:33:58 AM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

U.S. interrogators
=Our Military Men/Women
& Newsweek lied about them...
352 posted on 05/16/2005 4:34:12 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

You are talking about Clinton's lies in regards to his sexual harrassment suit. He was also accused of rape by a different woman that never went to a trial.


353 posted on 05/16/2005 4:41:42 AM PDT by swilhelm73 (Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. --Lord Acton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
Newsweek should be sued in the world court,and held financially libel for all damage, deaths and suffering

Wait a minute, NW was certainly negligible in their reporting, but to go bonkers and KILL people over flushin' a Koran is ludicrous.

You can only hold NW responsible to a certain extent on this...

354 posted on 05/16/2005 4:45:23 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Anti-US demonstrations in some countries.

The enemy posts this stuff on web sites for recruiting purposes.

The anti-American agenda beats their chest. Other news agencies repeat the story.

The US anti-war, anti-military crowd feels Justified.

Riots in some places.

Flag burnings abroad.

The story was beaten repeatedly in the international media, the correction I heard “ONCE”. Our image is tarnished.




After the fact, Newsweek says "Ooops-sorry about that". I guess it's no big deal? "It's all good" Right? Even their apology is probably not forthcoming. Just a quick reaction to head off what would have come had they not retracted their false claim. So they go back on what they say, but do so in a way where they keep face and maintain that their might be "some" truth to this. Disgusting. Just make it grey enough to where they can't be sued for slander.

But what can you expect of a magazine that published an article in 2003 claiming the war in Iraq only went so well because of "Clinton’s Army". Giving Clinton credit for the militaries success when it was he like no other in history who “bled” the DoD and even coined a term for it, “Peace Dividend”.

If I write something hideous and untruthful. If this harms someone, maybe causes them to loose a job, have their marriage break up and this person is labeled as a crook. If later the truth is unveiled that it’s just BS (CBS-Dan Rather style), the victim gets what? “Ooops, sorry about that.” But the media will surly want to keep the $$millions$$ they made.

Like Rather, that journalist deserves to be exposed and fired. That’s after he apologizes in print, radio and TV. While I understand the need for a free press, I also understand the concept of “responsibility”. The writer of this story is either: 1. Incompetent and needs fired. 2. Lied, is unethical/unprofessional and needs fired. What is it? Liar or idiot? Always give people options!

Red6


355 posted on 05/16/2005 4:47:25 AM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6
Get a load of this......

Muslims doubt Quran climbdown

"We will not be deceived by this," Islamic cleric Mullah Sadullah Abu Aman told Reuters in the northern Afghan province of Badakhshan.

"This is a decision by America to save itself. It comes because of American pressure. Even an ordinary illiterate peasant understands this and won't accept it."

356 posted on 05/16/2005 4:50:15 AM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry

You're 100% right!

"Their shoddy ass journalism got people killed.

Sorry isn't cutting it !"


Red6


357 posted on 05/16/2005 4:52:40 AM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Comment #358 Removed by Moderator

To: Pikamax

Wow....hope all those dead people will see it in their heavenly hearts to accept the Newsweek apology.

BUSH HATING B*STARDS!!!!!!! does the first amendment protect SLANDER??????


359 posted on 05/16/2005 5:06:02 AM PDT by Vaquero ('I'm a Red Stater, trapped in the body of a Blue State')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
NEWSWEEK KILLED MORE PEOPLE THAN MY GUNS EVER DID!
360 posted on 05/16/2005 5:10:45 AM PDT by Vaquero ('I'm a Red Stater, trapped in the body of a Blue State')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 441-457 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson