Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Responding to Mr. Paul's latest endeavor, David E. Kendall, a lawyer for the Clintons, called Mr. Paul's character into question. "Peter Paul is a man with an impressive record of felony convictions, currently in federal custody," he said.

"...and that's why we hired him in the first place," he then added. Why won't all of these Gawd-awful people just go away.

1 posted on 05/03/2005 3:21:40 AM PDT by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pharmboy

I welcome a Hitlery candidacy. She's stiffer than Kerry, and when she tries to act relaxed, and laugh off her stiffness, she ends up cackling like a frightened hen.


2 posted on 05/03/2005 3:26:56 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

Peter Paul is now in their crosshairs. If this keeps up, the only friends the Clintons will have will be GW and 'Chip-and-Dales' Laura.


5 posted on 05/03/2005 3:37:45 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

Reading between the lines, as you ALWAYS have to do with the media, here's the story line: While Peter Paul was a good guy when he was allied with the Clintons, so the media could ignore him. Now he's a bad guy when allied with conservatives, and he must be destroyed.


8 posted on 05/03/2005 3:44:27 AM PDT by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
David E. Kendall, a lawyer for the Clintons, called Mr. Paul's character into question. "Peter Paul is a man with an impressive record of felony convictions..."...and that's why we hired him in the first place".

You beat me to it! Neither the Clintons nor the NYT had any problems with this fellow until he turned on them. It has amazed me over the years how many people the Clintons have stabbed in the back who are not willing to testify. I guess I wouldn't be surprised if this guy turns up dead under mysterious circumstances within the next 6 months.

9 posted on 05/03/2005 3:46:21 AM PDT by libertylover (Being liberal means never being concerned about the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy; All

14 posted on 05/03/2005 4:08:16 AM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy

bump


18 posted on 05/03/2005 5:38:04 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
Responding to Mr. Paul's latest endeavor, David E. Kendall, a lawyer for the Clintons, called Mr. Paul's character into question.

Oh boy! Little man Kendall is back and using the same old Clintonista character attack methods.

20 posted on 05/03/2005 6:16:14 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
If Peter Paul was such a bad guy, how is it that the Clintons and the Secret Service apparently never checked out Peter Paul? How is it that he was able to sit with them at dinner and at the concert? Why did Hillary return his $2,000 donation to her campaign but not reimburse him for the $2 million?

Hillary is a tyrant who must always be in control of everything. Does anyone believe she did not order the now indicted David Rosen to phony up reports? Does anyone think he did that on his own?

23 posted on 05/03/2005 9:03:11 AM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
Not too much of a slanted headline, huh? Anti-Clinton group. Hernandez is the designated reporter from the NY TIMES to cover this adventure.

Guess what, NY TIMES? You no longer have a monopoly on what is news and what people should believe. Those of us in pajamas now have our say. Go ask Dan Rather.

24 posted on 05/03/2005 9:08:56 AM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
HERE IS A STORY WITHOUT THE CLINTON BUTT-KISSING
25 posted on 05/03/2005 9:13:11 AM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
The man whose claims are behind the recent criminal indictment of Hillary Rodham Clinton's former fund-raising director
=====================================================================

Actually, the man behind the criminal indictment would typically be a federal prosecutor. And the man who committed the felonies would also have something to do with it. But I guess Hernandez knows best.

26 posted on 05/03/2005 9:48:48 AM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Responding to Mr. Paul's latest endeavor, David E. Kendall, a lawyer for the Clintons, called Mr. Paul's character into question. "Peter Paul is a man with an impressive record of felony convictions, currently in federal custody," he said. "Most of his civil suit has already been dismissed and the remainder has no merit."
===========================================================

As usual, this is total B.S. from Kendall. Without FreeRepublic, he would get away with it. The case proceeds. What was thrown out was thrown out because the statute of limitations had tolled. The Clintons have tried to stop this at the trial level, the appellate level, and the California Supreme Court level. Lost, lost, lost. The case proceeds. He insults the California Supreme Court who determined that the case has merit. I wish they would hold him in contempt or gag him.

27 posted on 05/03/2005 10:24:05 AM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy
The Hillary Clinton Accountability Project goes live tonight at 9pm. See this thread for details.
28 posted on 05/03/2005 4:36:55 PM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pharmboy; Interesting Times
The Biased Liberal media is EAGER to report that Hitlery is
"Moving to the center."

Ha! Yeah, right. When pigs fly.

Check out her "Move to the center" here, per the ACU. She
went from "10" in 2003 to a GOOSE EGG (0) in 2004, on a
scale of 100 = perfect conservative.

Moving to the center? He**, she's farther left in 2004 than
EVER!



Click here or on the pic for the article.


Hillary's Rating per the ACU


Senator Hillary Clinton (D)
New York
Democrat, Years of Service: 4

ACU Ratings for Senator Clinton:
Year 2004 0
Year 2003 10
Lifetime 9

29 posted on 05/03/2005 5:31:37 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson