Skip to comments.
US House of Rep. in an Extraordinary Sunday night Session [Schiavo] (Bush Signs Schiavo bill)
Posted on 03/20/2005 6:03:40 PM PST by FoxPro
This is an unprecedented session. The Congress is meeting to save one persons life (in real time).
The only reason the Democrats are agreeing to this is that they dont want to be known as the party that killed Terri.
This is American history happening before your eyes.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; deathlobby; democratssuck; demswantterridead; dirtyrats; euthanasia; hitlersheirs; libertarianssuck; murderinc; obstructionistdems; paartyofdeath; proverbs836b; rats; rinossuck; schiavo; schiavobill; shiavo; sorelosers; terri; terrischiavo; terrislaw; uselessmouths; wexler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,621-1,640, 1,641-1,660, 1,661-1,680 ... 3,061-3,075 next last
To: xzins
1,641
posted on
03/20/2005 9:10:36 PM PST
by
MarMema
("America may have won the battles, but the Nazis won the war." Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall)
To: BCrago66
The Supreme Court's jurisdiction regarding this case is discretionary, and it's unlikely it will take up the case, especailly inasmuch as it already turned the case down. It turned the case down when it was requested to overturn the Florida State Court.
This law about to be voted on will likely be found unconstitutional by a federal court, and the USSC will not hear an appeal on that ruling.
1,642
posted on
03/20/2005 9:10:40 PM PST
by
sinkspur
("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
To: All
When a judge makes a ruling that you don't like the judge will say "write to your legislator to change the law". Well that is EXACTLY what is happening.
The judge says he followed the law and if you don't like that contact your legislature. What democrats don't like is that the conservatives are acting FAST.
(sort of the MSM screaming like a stuck pig.)
To: goldstategop
A possible conversation between Congresswoman Carson and her husband (courtesy "South Park"):
Thomas: And that was the third time we saw the Loch Ness monster. Then one time, I believe it was July-
Nellie: August.
Thomas: -August. There's a knock on the door. I open it, and there's this cute little girl scout-
Nellie: And she was so adorable, with the little pig tails and all.
Thomas: -And she says to me, "How would you like to buy some cookies?" And I said "Well, what kind do you have?" She had thin mints, graham crunchy things-
Nellie: Raisin oatmeal.
Thomas: -Raisin oatmeal, and I said "We'll take a graham crunch. How much will that be?" And she looks at me and she says, "
Uh I need about tree-fitty."
Nellie:
Tree-fitty.
Thomas: Well, it was about that time that I notice that girl scout was about eight stories tall and was a crustacean from the protozoic era.
Nellie: The Loch Ness monster.
Thomas: I said, "Dammit monster! Get off my lawn! I ain't giving you no tree-fitty!" It said, "how about just two-fitty?" I said, "Oh, now it's only two-fitty!! What?! Is there a sale on Loch Ness munchies or something?!"
Nellie: Lord, he was angry.
Thomas: Damn right, I was angry!
Nellie: Not you, the monster. He was about to kick your ***.
To: Soul Seeker
Thank you! That's so kind. I expected to be zotted for that comment!
I believe that many Democrats are fleeing the Republican party and that many more will flee after Howard Dean begins to get comfortable in his role as DNC Chairman. Hillary will, of course, continue to move to the center. Like George w. Bush, after she gets comfortable in the role of President (G-d forbid) she will truly pursue her socialist objectives.
Sorry, got side tracked! I've been posting on my blog about Terri so much it's a thrill to discuss pure politics . . . back to business!
1,645
posted on
03/20/2005 9:10:51 PM PST
by
JanetteS
(www.CommonSenseRunsWild.com)
To: sinkspur
("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.") Well, since you asked...
Matthew 5:21, 19:18; Mark 10:19; Luke 18:20; Romans 13:9
See also: Gen. 1:26,28; II Samuel 1:14; James 1:27; Isaiah 1:11,23; Romans 15:1; Leviticus 19:32; and Psalms 71:9
To: muawiyah
Oh puhleeeaze! The Democrats have been aborting their voters since 1973. This is just the icing on the cake.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
1,647
posted on
03/20/2005 9:10:56 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: sinkspur
It's already illegal to do to an animal what Greer has ordered for Terri.
1,648
posted on
03/20/2005 9:10:59 PM PST
by
Petronski
(If 'Judge' Greer can kill Terri, who will be next?)
To: PhilDragoo
Hoyer is with us!!! Who woulda thunk it?
1,649
posted on
03/20/2005 9:10:59 PM PST
by
MarMema
("America may have won the battles, but the Nazis won the war." Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall)
Comment #1,650 Removed by Moderator
To: Tree of Liberty
You can't even get on that site right now!!!!! I hope it hasn't been hacked!!!!!!!!!
1,651
posted on
03/20/2005 9:11:08 PM PST
by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
You really might want to be more careful with slinging about the Nazi references. She's Jewish.
To: sinkspur
Congress is indeed acting under Constitutional authority to determine jurisdiction of federal courts.
Congress will not have the final say. It is likely that the USSC, which has already ruled on this matter once, will determine that Congress does not have the authority to overrule Florida courts.
Umm NO that is exactly wrong again. The Congress is exercising one of it's little used powers to over see the Judiciary. This is EXACTLY the check our founders intended. Our system was never meant to be an aristocracy of Judges. There are limits to the Judges powers. What you are seeing is a wholly legitimate exercise of Legislative oversite.
What is far more likely is that the SC will simple refuse, as they did earlier, to assume oversite on the issue.
1,653
posted on
03/20/2005 9:11:16 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Next up, US Senate. 60 in 06!)
To: Soul Seeker
I was totaly shocked at that -- animals over people -- why am I not surprised?
1,654
posted on
03/20/2005 9:11:17 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Increase Republicans in Congress in 2006!)
To: SouthernFreebird
I'm about to poke myself in the eye for some excitement.
1,655
posted on
03/20/2005 9:11:19 PM PST
by
cwiz24
(I worked very hard on this tagline.)
To: Darnright
You are darn right!
No one would choose to live like that. She probably isn't aware of it anyway. But her life is precious and she shouldn't be treated worse than it is legal to treat an animal.
We have a sort of similar situation in my extended family... heart attack, no oxygen for 3 to 5 minutes. Lots of suffering for everyone concerned. But I realized a while ago that this situation has the capacity to make saints out of people... it brings out unselfishness and love and a whole lot of wonderful things in people - due to the suffering of the one who had the heart attack. He is the vehicle for a lot of graces.
To: Wiser now
He Needs a FReeping in a bad way,but how can we do it if he turns off and blocks everything.
Comment #1,658 Removed by Moderator
To: ALOHA RONNIE
Good Evening Aloha Ronnie. Thank you. Terri's gonna make it.
THANKS FOR THE PING
1,659
posted on
03/20/2005 9:11:48 PM PST
by
Smartass
(BUSH & CHENEY to 2008 Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
To: JanetteS
I hope you are very careful about what you say within earshot of anyone...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,621-1,640, 1,641-1,660, 1,661-1,680 ... 3,061-3,075 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson