Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The coolest spy plane ever built, SR-71.
Various ^ | 2-5-05

Posted on 02/05/2005 3:15:15 PM PST by Indy Pendance

Edited on 02/05/2005 3:17:49 PM PST by Lead Moderator. [history]

The coolest spy plane ever built, SR-71. I was watching Modern Marvels on the History channel last night. This aircraft broke all kinds of international speed and altitude records which still have not been beaten today. It was nothing for them to fly at 80,000 feet and it was a piece of cake to fly at about mach 3, or about 2100 mph. For those of you old enough, remember the sonic boom days? About 750 miles would create a sonic boom, or a doppler effect.

Here's the question, this plane was so fast, it was faster than the earth's rotation. What would happen with time over a long sustainable period of flying time? If it goes faster than the earth's rotation long enough, will it be ahead of time when it lands, or likewise in the opposite direction, will it go back in time. Do you think Einstein has an answer? Saturday night ponderings.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: flight; miltech; speedofsoundx5; spyplane; sr71
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-347 next last
To: Indy Pendance; djf; Prophet in the wilderness; Rightly Biased; barkeep
I also heard they leaked a lot of fuel.

*burp*:


281 posted on 02/06/2005 4:53:09 AM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

I guess it wasn't warmed up yet


282 posted on 02/06/2005 5:01:50 AM PST by Rightly Biased (I believe If you can't say something good about somebody your probably talking about Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Connie Cardullo
Go here for the specific question, or here for answers to relativity questions in general.
283 posted on 02/06/2005 5:08:22 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
you're up early.

Up late, actually. I'm heading to bed in five minutes. ;-)

284 posted on 02/06/2005 5:30:04 AM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"OK, the real question might be, if we can travel faster than the speed of light, what would happen?"

I have no idea. Einstein's formula breaks down, since faster-than-light speed forces taking the square root of a negative number (v=velocity, c=speed of light).

Just getting close to light speed increases mass, such that at light speed, mass is infinite. It's real hard to accelerate infinite mass.

285 posted on 02/06/2005 5:30:25 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
A precursor. This was a CIA project.

Link 1

Link 2

Link 3

Link 4

286 posted on 02/06/2005 5:33:59 AM PST by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
What would happen with time over a long sustainable period of flying time?

The pilots became extremely tired. ;-)
287 posted on 02/06/2005 5:36:04 AM PST by RetroWarrior ("We count it death to falter, not to die")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

I saw it recently. It is in the new aviation museum at Dulles.


288 posted on 02/06/2005 5:40:10 AM PST by bert (Peace is only halftime !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Yes I saw this page before. Personally I put my money on the sweetman configuration, but who knows? Here is an interesting quote for you. It came from an ex-area 51 operative on a special I watched on Discovery Wings awhile back - his face was blacked out and voice altered, of course. "Whatever aircraft you see publicly - the Stealth, B2, etc., understand that the most advanced, secret aircraft the U.S. has are, on average, 50 years ahead of them." Thats wild!! Based on that we can only imagine whats being flown today....


289 posted on 02/06/2005 7:03:58 AM PST by wingsof liberty (Marines - the few, the proud, the best!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Tommyjo

**They forget that they would need to keep a dedicated 'Q tanker' type fleet for the fuel.***

The KC-135 can be used to refuel other aircraft without any changes. We refueled B-52s and fighters in SE Asia with JP-4 fuel. Upon return to the US we would purge the tanks and refill with JP-7 for the SR-71.

WE used to have to hand purge by draining the spare tanks of JP-4 and put in and drain a small amount of JP-7 to wash out any JP-4 left. The tanks were then considered purged.

The "Q" designation came because later a smaller spare tank was added for an inflight purge. This tank was filled with JP-7 and while inflight this fuel was transfered to the empty storage tanks to wash out the remaining JP-4. It was then dumped inflight. It saved us a lot of time and trouble.

You can still refuel other aircraft with the KC-135Q with no changes other than the jet propellant.


290 posted on 02/06/2005 7:37:20 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (When someone burns a cross on your lawn, the best firehose is an AK-47.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased

Hello Rightly Biased!

I saw your post after I piped up! Much, much better than my feeble attempt. The Cosmosphere is a true jewel for SC Kansas!

I was working in Hutch when the SR addition to the Cosmosphere was added! So cool!

Take Care,

MFO


291 posted on 02/06/2005 7:38:41 AM PST by Man from Oz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: spower
Would anyone buy it if the top speed of the SR-71 was actually Mach 5 versus Mach 3?

Closer to Mach 6. The problem is crew members who become crisppy-critters when the dang thing gets too hot and crew-cooling gets over-whelmed.

292 posted on 02/06/2005 7:45:35 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Oh, now look whatcha did.

You hurt my wittle feelings.

< |:)~


293 posted on 02/06/2005 7:56:30 AM PST by martin_fierro (_____oooo_( ° ¿ ° )_oooo_____)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

Yes, in the early models. Later on the SR-71 was fitted with a pneumatic start.


294 posted on 02/06/2005 8:09:20 AM PST by FreedomAvatar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
They did leak some fuel but it was largely a myth that they leaked so much fuel they had to be refueled immediately after takeoff. Truth is, they rarely took off with a full load.
295 posted on 02/06/2005 8:11:32 AM PST by FreedomAvatar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

SR-71
The plane "grew" 11 inches in length when at operational altitudes...heat expansion

It leaked like a sieve: no fuel bladders...it only got tight when it got hot.

A one degree climb angle resulted in 3000f/m increase in altitude.

It regularly flew over the Kamchatcha Peninsula and Sakhalin
Island and would be chased by a series of Russian fighters doing ballistic climbs trying to get close enough to fire on it.

The offical top speed was just over 2,400 mph, ceiling at 80k.

Unoffical speed closer to 3k mph
Unoffical altitude closer to 120k feet

Most of the above from my brother who helped design the bird.


296 posted on 02/06/2005 8:25:23 AM PST by OregonRancher (illigitimus non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

dude you are watching WAY TOO MUCH tv


297 posted on 02/06/2005 8:29:26 AM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OregonRancher
SR-71
The plane "grew" 11 inches in length when at operational altitudes...heat expansion

It leaked like a sieve: no fuel bladders...it only got tight when it got hot.

the pilot I heard speak mentioned this, but he pointed out that it would have been safe to drop a lit match into the leaking fuel, which he said sloshed around the pilots feet at times, since the ignition point of the fuel was so high.

Most of the above from my brother who helped design the bird.

Your brother worked with Kelly Johnson? That would have been an amazing place to work. He must be a very talented designer. I'm very jealous of the stories you must have heard.

298 posted on 02/06/2005 8:46:45 AM PST by Phsstpok ("When you don't know where you are, but you don't care, you're not lost, you're exploring.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Tommyjo

thanks,
now I've blown the whole morning.


299 posted on 02/06/2005 9:08:20 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

Drinking beer makes you smarter. It made Budweizer.


It absolutely does. Does anyone have the Cliff Claven buffaloe theory handy?


300 posted on 02/06/2005 9:34:18 AM PST by Figment (Ich bin ein Jesuslander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-347 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson