Skip to comments.
ARREST OUR MOM
NY Post ^
| BRAD HAMILTON
Posted on 01/09/2005 7:35:33 AM PST by Pharmboy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Hodar
"Mom gets to spend it on anything that enters her mind..."
You forgot breast implants and meth......
21
posted on
01/09/2005 8:35:55 AM PST
by
rockrr
(Revote or Revolt! It's up to you Washington!)
To: WV Mountain Mama
From experience I'd say more than you think view them as the latter........
22
posted on
01/09/2005 8:38:50 AM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: Slyfox
Surely the boys are old enough to move to their dad's place without an okay from a judge. And this might give her the necessary scenario to have her exclude them fron her Will. They're not that stupid - greed works both ways.
23
posted on
01/09/2005 8:42:29 AM PST
by
solitas
To: solitas
Heiress's don't usually marry lowlife. I'd guess Daddy is also very wealthy and knew the judge that said he didn't have to pay child support.
The entire article sounds like creative writing.....Actually, Kerry & Tereeeeza come to mind.
24
posted on
01/09/2005 9:15:05 AM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Pharmboy
Weigh them both, give them a pre-induction physical exam; if they are malnourished, hang her butt - if they are fat little pigs, hang her butt.
25
posted on
01/09/2005 9:19:43 AM PST
by
Old Professer
(When the fear of dying no longer obtains no act is unimaginable.)
To: Unknown Freeper
The mom may not put food in the house for the kids to "walk to the fridge and get some". Also, If you is abusive, the kids may be scared to do so.
A child, under 18 should not have to work for their own food. That is the job of the parent to provide food and housing until the child is 18.
26
posted on
01/09/2005 9:37:36 AM PST
by
trussell
(I Never Frown, even when I am sad, because I never know who is falling in love with my Smile!!!)
To: Pharmboy
After reading the whole article the dad sounds like no prize either.
Nothing prevents him from giving the boys money personally to buy stuff.
27
posted on
01/09/2005 9:41:11 AM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum europe vincendarum (V minus 6 and counting))
To: stopem
Where did you see that the dad was doing anything wrong?
28
posted on
01/09/2005 9:41:52 AM PST
by
trussell
(I Never Frown, even when I am sad, because I never know who is falling in love with my Smile!!!)
To: Pharmboy
At first I thought this was a post from Chelsea!
To: trussell
Both the Mom and the Dad are obviously using the situation for revenge and money not for the welfare of the kids.
30
posted on
01/09/2005 9:44:15 AM PST
by
stopem
To: All
Reading the whole story gives a totally different perspective. Additionally, she was supposedly the heir of Irving Pauker but a google search produced zip on him.
I'm inclined to think this is a book review??????
31
posted on
01/09/2005 9:46:00 AM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: trussell
Let me put it this way. Your kid is hungry, would you, A.) go to court or B.) have someone deliver them food on a daily basis so they have enough to eat?
That the boys are relying on aid from the school and part time jobs does not say much for the father. There are plenty of work arounds but he appears not to care.
32
posted on
01/09/2005 9:47:47 AM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum europe vincendarum (V minus 6 and counting))
To: stopem
Again...please show me the information in the article which leads you to believe the father is using the kids for revenge and/or money.
33
posted on
01/09/2005 9:49:34 AM PST
by
trussell
(I Never Frown, even when I am sad, because I never know who is falling in love with my Smile!!!)
To: Slyfox
Not necessarily. They should abide by court orders. And Dad would still be under an order to pay.
34
posted on
01/09/2005 9:49:55 AM PST
by
GVnana
(If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
To: Pharmboy
I'm not one for having children make a public stink about their parents, but this may be a case where the kids have more class than Mom.
35
posted on
01/09/2005 9:52:53 AM PST
by
GVnana
(If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
It looks like Daddy is very, very rich, too. I still the the entire story is phoney.
36
posted on
01/09/2005 9:53:48 AM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: trussell
Daddy says he still doesn't know how much money is ex has due to her inheritance. Guess what...it's none of his business....it's totally hers.
37
posted on
01/09/2005 9:56:02 AM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Sacajaweau
The boys claim he has financial problems but unless he is living in the gutter he should have no problem arranging for the kids to be able to run a tab for food and supplies.
He does not have to pay child support legally, but morally he should be providing for his family. This does not mean he has to give her the money. He could easily set up an account for the boys so they could get what they need or even,(gasp!) drive over every week to see them and actually buy stuff that they need for them.
38
posted on
01/09/2005 10:02:56 AM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum europe vincendarum (V minus 6 and counting))
To: trussell
"claim they're abused, neglected and were recently offered a dinner of half an apple. So they've become amateur sleuths collecting bank statements and benefits records and delivering the documents to their father, Gary Jacobs, What Father would use Children who claim to be abused and neglected to collect bank statements etc and deliver it to HIM?
Why didn't he take those kids and feed them instead of using them?
Period enough said.
39
posted on
01/09/2005 10:04:41 AM PST
by
stopem
To: stopem
It does not say that the father "used" the kids to gather the information. The boys gathered the information and gave it to the one person they thought could help. Of course, it doesn't say it happened the way I put it either...but hey...were just assuming facts anyway!
40
posted on
01/09/2005 10:08:32 AM PST
by
trussell
(I Never Frown, even when I am sad, because I never know who is falling in love with my Smile!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson