Well, in any event, Meek summoned the kitties here weeks ago,
and now it is time for his certificate. :-)Bye, Ernie.cal!
He's dead, Jim!
He's dead, Jim.
(Click here or on the pic).
Posted on 12/23/2004 7:40:45 AM PST by Ernie.cal
I have read many messages which object to same-sex marriage but I am still waiting to learn what specific adverse consequences opponents of gay marriage anticipate to result from its legalization.
In other words, suppose same-sex marriage becomes law during 2005. By 2010 or 2015 what specific indisputable adverse consequences to society do opponents predict to occur?
With respect to those critics of same-sex marriage who refer to "God's law" and "procreation" --- do they believe that heterosexual couples who cannot have children, or who do not wish to have children, should also NOT be allowed to marry?
The essence of a free society is choice---including the option of choosing private behavior that does not cause harm to another person. The alternative is coercion, i.e. using the coercive (and punitive) power of government through laws, bureaucrats, and police to dictate what choices are permissible.
Do opponents of same-sex marriage propose that our society should begin identifying areas where choices involving human intimacy should be regulated by government entities and thus dilute our commitment to the values inherent in a free society?
Homosexual acts are by nature perverted. Anyone who advocates normalizing and promoting such perverted acts, especially to children and teenagers, is promoting evil. Some things are good, some are bad. Objective reality exists. Your opinion is wrong. Mine is right. If you don't like the word perverted, then stop promoting perversion, and you won't have to be bothered by the word anymore because it will no longer apply to you.
It actually didn't go over his head, it hit him in the center of the forehead but due to psychosis he didn't notice.
"It is easier (and more productive) to characterize an entire class of total strangers as depraved, sexual deviants who engage in and celebrate perversion."
Well, an entire class of people whose sole commanlity is the practice and "celebration" of sexual perversion bring on the characterization all by themselves. They don't need any outside help from anyone else.
Oh, I guess you can't respond with any greased pig verbiage any more. Too bad.
What really bothered me was his incessant lying. Such as the following in regards to the APA and Paul Cameron:
Which you did not dispute!
But I did dispute just that in post 482. And then I said:
In summary, everything you've posted stems from a politically motivated attack from politically correct professional organizations. This is a family friendly website that pushes conservatism, not lies.
Of course the context demonstrates I was referring to the lies stemming from that discredited Pietryzk, yet he twisted it, trying to say I called him a liar. I often got the feeling I was discussing the issues with more than one person.
Just when you thought he had been shown for the disruptor that he was, he would start to rehash everything all over again as if no previous discussion on the issue had taken place. Disruptor, indeed.
Apparently Ernie.cal can't separate the person from the behavior. And it's the behavior that upsets me, if I may - not the person.
One of the truths that homosexual promoters refuse to see or discuss is the basic fact that behavior ALONE is what distinguishes "gays" from non-"gays". And that behavior can, and often is, changed. Rejected. Done no more.
Just as I used to "be" an alcoholic, a drug user, a fornicator, even a thief. But no more. Was I those because I was born that way? Should I still call myself one of those even though I haven't engaged in those behaviors for more than three (well, one of them is two) decades?
They want to make behavior - which is voluntarily engaged in, and can change, into an unchangeable identity. It will not work, as it is a lie.
And your tagline says why.
All this time and hundreds of posts later, you still refuse to address my question. You must address the question, otherwise you can bellow all you want to - you have no case. The reason you refuse to answer the question is because you cannot, and so you choose to instead pretend I didn't ask it - because you know it shows how implausible your whole argument is.
Actually that loud sound must have been a thunderbolt - he has been ZOTTED. I guess he made a comment way over the top on another thread or something.
I don't think he'll be responding - he's been banned.
I think it was because of this thread.
I was going to post a link to all his recently threads, but you can't do that once somebody is banned. The last time I checked (earlier today), he was only posting on this thread since he originally posted it on 12/23/2004.
It's getting late - it's Friday and it's been a very long week. Catch you later.
Well, in any event, Meek summoned the kitties here weeks ago, and now it is time for his certificate. :-)
Definitely trollish behavior, then.
How about saying, " I am still waiting to learn what specific adverse consequences proponents of gay marriage anticipate to result from its NOT BEING legalized. "
Well, in any event, Meek summoned the kitties here weeks ago,
and now it is time for his certificate. :-)Bye, Ernie.cal!
He's dead, Jim!
He's dead, Jim.
(Click here or on the pic).
"I was going to post a link to all his recently threads,
but you can't do that once somebody is banned. The last
time I checked (earlier today), he was only posting on
this thread since he originally posted it on 12/23/2004."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/user-posts?name=Ernie.cal
There are his "In Forum" comments, if you want to check
it out.
It looks like his last comment on another thread was on
January 5th.
FBI REPORT ON BIRCH SOCIETY
Posted by Ernie.cal to Del Rio Wildcat 2
On Bloggers & Personal 01/05/2005 11:39:02 PM CST · 23 of 23
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
