Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Something doesnt feel right about this...its difficult when its such a tragedy.
1 posted on 12/22/2004 5:07:25 AM PST by wallcrawlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wallcrawlr

I just hope when the family does gain access they realize the 200+ messages regarding Cheating Housewives and Hot Teen Sl^ts may *not* be something the soldier willingly subscribed to (hopefully!).


2 posted on 12/22/2004 5:10:34 AM PST by Capagrl (Integrity is shown in what you do, not what you say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr

I wonder if you can prevent this in your living will. I hope you can prevent this in your living will.


3 posted on 12/22/2004 5:12:17 AM PST by commonguymd (the commonguy's corner bar blogspot - http://commonguyva.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr

If Yahoo does not give them their son's e-mails, I will never use any of their services or log on to any of their web sponsors again. We must organize a boycott of Yahoo all across the net. Make them feel this family's pain! Yahoo is run by a bunch of Liberal A$$h0les anyway. This is a crime against a suffering family. Yahoo must be made to pay.....


4 posted on 12/22/2004 5:15:55 AM PST by Red Badger (If the Red States are JESUSLAND, then the Blue States are SATANLAND......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
I don't understand why would they want to get into the man's email account. If he decided, while alive, for his family NOT to know his password, why would his death make any difference? They cannot argue that they want copies of his emails, they have that in their inbox or copies of what they sent, they have that on their sent box. Something is very fishy here and I am surprised nobody in that little article brought up the issue.
5 posted on 12/22/2004 5:17:23 AM PST by Quinotto (On matters of style,swim with the current,on matters of principle stand like a rock-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr

Kinda torn on this one. His e-mails could lead to a good book or article on the "Mind of a Marine" or something like that.

But, I'm thinking they'll find things they probably don't want to see, and shouldn't.

Personally? I don't keep stuff in my e-mail account that I wouldn't want anyone else to see. Not being moralistic, just saving myself the embarassment. (And two decades of military training; don't leave anything behind for the enemy to use against you, you know?) ;)


6 posted on 12/22/2004 5:17:49 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
People having Yahoo or similar email addys have them for a reason--primarily, privacy; secondarily, universality [being able to access easily via the web].

I have to side with Yahoo. Unless the owner of the email address has granted someone else account access, no one else should have access. It would be no different than finding the deceased had a bank account and a relative other than the 'beneficiary' tried to claim access due to blood-relationship.

Yahoo has a privacy policy. The deceased signed up to Yahoo and agreed to that policy. The parents, aunt, 2nd cousin on mother's side, nor anyone else, have an automatic right to access the man's account.
12 posted on 12/22/2004 5:32:20 AM PST by TomGuy (America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr

I posted yesterday that I honestly don't know whether Yahoo! is right or wrong in not providing access to the soldier's emails to his family. Today has dawned, and I still don't know. There are good points on both sides, and all I can really say is "Be careful what you ask for".


14 posted on 12/22/2004 5:33:25 AM PST by asgardshill (Will shill for Zwieback toast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
WHY?
19 posted on 12/22/2004 5:37:20 AM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr

2 words "Court Order"


28 posted on 12/22/2004 5:47:42 AM PST by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr

The frustrating part of this is that whenever any unit of government so much as hints at subpoenaing them for access, Yahoo bends over and grabs its ankles instantly.


46 posted on 12/22/2004 6:09:56 AM PST by Kerfuffle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr

Perhaps the family wants to write to the unanswered emails from friends and inform them that their son has died.


49 posted on 12/22/2004 6:18:16 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (Some mornings it just doesn't seem worth it to gnaw through the leather straps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
I haven't finished reading this thread, but I heard about this case on talk-radio, with almost every opinion imaginable. No one speaks of the other side of the equation. What of this Marine's correspondants? Does anyone think they want this man's family reading their letters?
58 posted on 12/22/2004 7:02:44 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
I think Yahoo is doing the right thing.
78 posted on 12/22/2004 9:54:59 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
Why is email being treated differently than regular mail correspondence ?

If the family gets all of his property including postal mail upon death, they should also get his email.

End of controversy.


BUMP

80 posted on 12/22/2004 4:29:10 PM PST by tm22721 (In fac they)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr

Oh, this is soooo not a good idea.


81 posted on 12/22/2004 4:33:22 PM PST by mabelkitty (Blackwell for Governor in 2006!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr

There was an incident in San Francisco, an ex-marine prevented an assassination attempt. The SF Chron excitedly reported that he was homosexual. The marine had neglected to notify his family of this, and when they found out, he committed suicide. So the way I figure it, it's best to err on the side of privacy. If the marine wanted his family to read his email, he could have left them with his password.


82 posted on 12/22/2004 4:36:59 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr

I hope the family will have someone they know and trust look over the emails when they get into that e-mail account- before the immediate family can see them.


85 posted on 12/22/2004 4:42:53 PM PST by Diva Betsy Ross (I am not NOT PC.. And Proud of it!: Merry Christmas! Happy Hanukkah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr

Google: Yahoo password crack.

There seems to be no end to the number of people out there who claim to be able to do this.


86 posted on 12/22/2004 4:47:44 PM PST by Rebelbase (Who is General Chat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wallcrawlr
Password cracker?


90 posted on 12/22/2004 5:00:22 PM PST by wimpycat (As God is my witness, I'll never be "outraged" again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson