Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I hate California Whine!
1 posted on 12/05/2004 7:59:18 PM PST by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: pete anderson

They didn't win the PAC-10. It's that simple.


2 posted on 12/05/2004 8:01:19 PM PST by andrew2527
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

Sep 4 at Air Force W, 56-14
Sep 11 vs New Mexico State W, 41-14
Sep 16 at Southern Miss Postponed
Oct 2 at Oregon State W, 49-7
Oct 9 at USC L, 23-17
Oct 16 vs UCLA W, 45-28
Oct 23 at Arizona W, 38-0
Oct 30 vs Arizona State W, 27-0
Nov 6 vs Oregon W, 28-27
Nov 13 at Washington W, 42-12
Nov 20 vs Stanford W, 41-6

I don't know about anyone else , but this schedule does not look to hard other than USC (which they lost). Texas schedule is much harder IMO.
Dec 4 at Southern Miss W, 26-16


3 posted on 12/05/2004 8:03:12 PM PST by mlbford2 ("Never wrestle with a pig; you can't win, you just get filthy, and the pig loves it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

I could care less about Cal, but they got screwed. #4 and you are not in the big money?


4 posted on 12/05/2004 8:03:19 PM PST by fritzz (Even if you are on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there." Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson
I like Rodgers' high carry and quick release. I think Cal is a better team than Texas and it would have been good to have a Pac 10 and a Big 10 team in the Rose Bowl.

At least the Aggies get to go to the Cotton Bowl.
12 posted on 12/05/2004 8:10:47 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

Time for a playoff!!!!


13 posted on 12/05/2004 8:11:32 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("BZZZZZT You are fined one credit for violation of the Verbal Morality Statute")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson
Go Michigan!
14 posted on 12/05/2004 8:12:24 PM PST by Doug Fiedor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

Auburn got screwed more than anyone else. I know it's hard to justify changing the rankings of the top 2 teams when the teams that are #1 and #2 have been up there all season long and finished undefeated, but I've always said that the SEC is undoubtedly the toughest conference in the nation. Finishing 10-1 in the SEC is like being 11-0 anywhere else, and going 12-0 in the SEC means more than an undefeated season in any other conference.


15 posted on 12/05/2004 8:12:40 PM PST by Alberta's Child (If whiskey was his mistress, his true love was the West . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson
The only blemish on their record was a six-point loss at top-ranked USC. They beat 10 teams by an average of 23.9 points per game. They were the only school in the nation's top six both in scoring offense and scoring defense.

While Texas got shut out by the number 2 team OU.

20 posted on 12/05/2004 8:15:12 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

Cal is out, but Pitt is in?



Good Lord, the BCS sucks.


24 posted on 12/05/2004 8:20:20 PM PST by Petronski (WARNING: Persons denying the existence of Robots may be Robots themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

Here's what I would do: The AD of Cal and Auburn get together and hammer out a game after the season. Neutral site, highest bidder among all networks get the game. They get the cash, NCAA gets the finger, and we get one more great game.


25 posted on 12/05/2004 8:21:49 PM PST by lawnguy (Those who beat their swords into plow shares, are destined to be ruled by those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

If we are going to talk about "who's left out", we have to rank Auburn as the one left out in the cold.

Winning fourteen games in a row - going back to last season... Beating four teams ranked in the top ten when they played them - like LSU, co-national champion...allowing only one rushing touchdown all season until the SEC Championship last night...scoring on their opening drive in every game but one...truly a special team.

The BCS critics have predicted something like this would happen, but every year the supporters say that by season's end, everybody will lose at least one game. It didn't happen, and there is no playoff system to resolve the dispute...and the BCS Gods still rule NCAA Football.

Bring on the playoffs!!!


28 posted on 12/05/2004 8:23:47 PM PST by Rhetorical pi2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson
In my opinion, the time to complain about the system and your bowl selection is AFTER you win your bowl game. If Texas Tech comes in and thumps Cal they will have deserved to be left out of the Rose Bowl.
29 posted on 12/05/2004 8:24:04 PM PST by martinidon (Bush won sKerry lost and Soro's is out 100 plus million for nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson
In my opinion, the time to complain about the system and your bowl selection is AFTER you win your bowl game. If Texas Tech comes in and thumps Cal they will have deserved to be left out of the Rose Bowl.
30 posted on 12/05/2004 8:24:04 PM PST by martinidon (Bush won sKerry lost and Soro's is out 100 plus million for nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

Hook 'em


35 posted on 12/05/2004 8:26:01 PM PST by dmc8576 (High School Students for Bush - 325 members ....Students for Kerry - 20 members. ENOUGH SAID!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

What do you expect when you have an athletic competition decided by an opinion poll. Asinine.


38 posted on 12/05/2004 8:27:36 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson
what's the point of the bcs if all that matters is figuring out the top two teams? why is #3 playing #8? how dumb is that? they ought to play the entire football season as a single loss elimination tournament... you lose yer first game of the year?--season over ... that oughtta leave the best two teams preening


42 posted on 12/05/2004 8:29:08 PM PST by InvisibleChurch (Good ol' Coney Island College. Go WhiteFish. / pay no attention to the primedial newscasts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

The fourth-ranked Golden Bears will be stuck at the Holiday Bowl while Texas plays in the Rose Bowl.

Since the Holiday Bowl has had teams like Ohio St. and
other majoy teams and big names who now in the NFL,
I think it is the Holiday Bowl who is stuck with little
Cal.

BTW I would rather be stuck in San Diego rather than LA


46 posted on 12/05/2004 8:31:47 PM PST by SoCalPol (Hey Chirac, Call Germany Next Time. They Know The Way To Paris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

I hope they get mad enough to run up the score on ttech, which is ironically a team that has no problems with doing just that to other teams.


55 posted on 12/05/2004 8:43:03 PM PST by Vortex (Garbage in, Garbage Out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson
The BSc needs to be replaced by a playoff. No other sport is played on a computer except College FB.

Pray for W and Our Troops

57 posted on 12/05/2004 8:44:46 PM PST by bray (Time to Gloat!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pete anderson

Where is the press outrage over the higher rated Cal team being omitted from a BCS game? This is the same circumstance as last season, only it involves a game other than the so-called national championship game. Both the AP and Coaches voters considered Cal better than Texas why aren't they as upset as last year when they cried about USC being excluded from the Sugar Bowl? Just because the stakes are slightly less it doesn't change the principle issue.

Oh, I forgot. The press doesn't care about principles. They just care about what is "newsworthy", i.e. sells.


61 posted on 12/05/2004 8:50:38 PM PST by Poodlebrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson