Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shocking Questions: Yes, There Are Answers (Warning: graphic sexual content)
BreakPoint with Chuck Colson ^ | December 3, 2004 | Chuck Colson

Posted on 12/04/2004 5:17:59 PM PST by Mr. Silverback

Note: The following commentary includes graphic descriptions. This is not suitable for children.

“I’m at my wits’ end,” the young woman wrote. “I’ve asked pastors, friends, parents, God, and message boards this question and still haven’t received an intelligent answer that I can live with. Why are homosexual acts wrong? I’m a Christian and believe in the Bible, but this part always stumps me.”

According to my friend, Dr. J. Budziszewski, author of the excellent new book, Ask Me Anything: Provocative Answers for College Students, disturbing questions like this show that church leaders aren’t providing young people with the whole picture about sexuality. They may be faithfully teaching God’s rules, but when asked why God made these rules, too often they say, “Take two aspirin, and wait for the questions to go away.”

The good news, says Budziszewski, is that we can answer disturbing questions. Where are the answers found? In our creational design.

“People say homosexuality isn’t natural,” the young woman complained in her letter, “but that can’t be true because it’s found among animals.” Budziszewski answers, “But our nature is how God designed us. What’s natural for human beings isn’t whatever you can find some animal doing; it’s whatever fulfills our design. Men and women were plainly designed for each other—not men for men, nor women for women.” Children can be born in no other way.

“But homosexual acts don’t harm anyone,” said the young woman. Budziszewski answers, “The idea that homosexual acts don’t harm anyone isn’t even close to being true; they harm those who perform them at every level. To begin with the most obvious level—the physical—how could it not harm a man to suffer physical trauma because body parts are repeatedly forced into bodily openings that were designed for a radically different function?” And the rates of a long, long list of diseases are also much higher among practicing homosexuals, and contrary to popular belief, this is true for lesbians as well as for “gay” men.

At the emotional level, Budziszewski explains, the damage of homosexual acts is just as grave. God designed the male-female pair to balance each other; by contrast, same-sex mating drives them out of balance. If you want an example, think of the anonymous, no-brakes promiscuity of men who have sex with hundreds, even thousands, of other men.

“And what about spiritual harm?” asks Budziszewski. “In homosexual acts, you’re seeking union with someone who is only your own mirror image, so in a way, you’re still trapped inside yourself. You haven’t experienced the power of marital sexuality to take you beyond the Self; you’re rejecting the challenge of union with someone who is really other. In that way, homosexual acts are less like marital intercourse than like masturbation with another body.”

That’s frank, even startling language, but what’s happened to our culture is startling too. When young people confused by the culture ask questions, they need clear, unvarnished answers to set their thinking straight. That’s why I recommend this great new book Ask Me Anything: Provocative Answers for College Students.

God’s rules for sex are never arbitrary; they are based on how He made us. As Budziszewski rightly says, it’s all in the design.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: animalkingdom; antichristian; badfoundation; behavior; bestiality; brainwashing; breakpoint; budziszewski; busybodies; celebrateperversity; christianbashing; christianity; christians; gaytrolldolls; goandsinnomore; hedonists; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; ifitfeelsgooddoit; incest; indoctrination; itsjustsex; leavemealone; liberalbigots; libertines; nosey; rape; recreationalsex; reeducation; religion; religiousintolerance; seduction; sex; sexlaws; sin; sinners; sodomandgomorrah; sodomites; teatotallersyouidiot; teatoters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-194 next last
To: ScottM1968
I believe that you mean "Rich Mullins".

I believe you are a pedant. ;-)

101 posted on 12/04/2004 8:35:52 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (A Freelance Business Writer looking for business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
:-) Well, you seemed a bit nitpicky a while ago yourself, sir.
102 posted on 12/04/2004 8:37:08 PM PST by ScottM1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ScottM1968
Jesus "fulfilled" the Law.

Which was exactly my point. What was yours?

103 posted on 12/04/2004 8:38:51 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (A Freelance Business Writer looking for business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: sealee
This from a neo-pagan barbarian who loves the spirit of Christ.

In all seriousness, if you loved the true spirit of Christ, you would not be a neo-pagan.

104 posted on 12/04/2004 8:40:29 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (A Freelance Business Writer looking for business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: olrtex
Snip)At a minimum, the Billy Graham approach seems appropriate: yes, engaging in homosexual acts is a sin, but no worse than any other sin, such as the sin of "pride." That sin of "pride" (the opposite of humility) might even ensnare a fair number of Freepers from time to time.

An interesting concept, so does this mean the sin of glutony is the same as murder?I wonder why the bible doesn't rate sins?one being worse than the other? Could it be that is why God gave us common sense?

105 posted on 12/04/2004 8:41:05 PM PST by edchambers ("Pajama clad Neocon footsoldier of the Haliburton Death squad Digital brown shirts")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
You had asked the following:

"What makes you think the Law is still in force?

I merely stated that some of it still exists. The Ten Commandments are part of that "Law".

106 posted on 12/04/2004 8:41:31 PM PST by ScottM1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: PGalt
Mentally defaulting on the perpetuation of self, is an anti-life, dirt-road, cul-de-sac.

Um...you lost me. Please elaborate.

107 posted on 12/04/2004 8:43:51 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (A Freelance Business Writer looking for business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Well let me see... Yup quite possibly .

 I have a little problem joining in with the stone throwing. To begin with I'm not sure what correct sex is. I grew up in the catholic religion and it was male on top, to completion and only to conceive an offspring no birth control.

Guess when it comes to sex most you guys are a little shaky from where I stand  :-O

108 posted on 12/04/2004 8:49:09 PM PST by sandviper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: edchambers
An interesting concept, so does this mean the sin of glutony is the same as murder?I wonder why the bible doesn't rate sins?one being worse than the other? Could it be that is why God gave us common sense?

Every sin is the same to God.

Some things that we humans view as one sin (such as a murder) really require multiple sins. That's one reason the guy who kills his wife for insurance has done worse than I have when I eat a dessert on a full stomach...he had to get greed, pride and a whole host of other things involved, I just had to value chocolate over self discipline one time.

In addition, each harm done to a person by a sin constitutes another sin. So the murder has harm that ripples outward to an untold distance, but my chocolate cake...not so much.

So...murder is the same as gluttony...and not even close, at the same time.

109 posted on 12/04/2004 8:49:35 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (A Freelance Business Writer looking for business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Old Student

I have come to a realization that God didn't give us all those "thou shalt nots" because he is a prude, or because he has an obsession against people experiencing pleasure, or because he enjoys giving orders that no one likes. I believe that God, the creator, is familiar with every weakness of the creation and has issued rules, that if obeyed,even partially, will assure the greatest productivity, pleasure, and longetivity possible for us.

Reproducing our own kind, was programmed into the design. Homosexuality is that program gone totally awry, and a perfect formula for humanity's absolute extinction.


110 posted on 12/04/2004 8:53:54 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (If you were still in the womb, would you trust your life to Specter the defector?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sandviper
How is it "stone throwing" to believe that a thing which God calls "an abomination" is a bad idea? Especially when the subject at hand is someone asking "Why does God call this activity wrong?"

One of the things people miss about the stone-throwing parable is that the people standing around holding the stones were preachers involved in a plot to kill an innocent man. One is hardly in a similar position when one says, "Homosexuality is wrong." I could sit here and list a whole host of things I've done that are wrong...the stone thrower is not the one who believes that sin is sin, the stone thrower is the one who believes his or her sin is OK, or that he or she not a sinner, or that someone else is a "real sinner" and he or she is not.

Another thing people miss is that Jesus said "Go, and sin no more."

111 posted on 12/04/2004 8:57:44 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (A Freelance Business Writer looking for business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Every sin is the same to God.

That is not necessarily correct. All sins separate us from God equally, but some sins lose more rewards than others. Additionally, those who are in leadership or authority positions are held to a higher standard.

112 posted on 12/04/2004 9:04:09 PM PST by ScottM1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Well I might as well out myself now, no I'm not gay but there are members of my family who are.I do not consider them dangerous perverts,If they have an agenda I haven't heard of it.Two of them are devout Catholics who attend mass more in a week than I have in a month of Sundays.They don't condemn me for my indulgences in beer and cigarettes and I don't get into deep theological discussions about their sex life.Being that one of them is an X nun I'm a little out gunned scripturally so sin is sin and we'll just leave it at that.There are bigger fish to fry.


113 posted on 12/04/2004 9:10:21 PM PST by edchambers ("Pajama clad Neocon footsoldier of the Haliburton Death squad Digital brown shirts")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
“People say homosexuality isn’t natural,” the young woman complained in her letter, “but that can’t be true because it’s found among animals.”

Just because animals do it, that doesn't mean humans should. Rape, infanticide and cannibalism are all found among animals.

114 posted on 12/04/2004 9:14:42 PM PST by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
the stone thrower is not the one who believes that sin is sin, the stone thrower is the one who believes his or her sin is OK, or that he or she not a sinner, or that someone else is a "real sinner" and he or she is not.

Personally do I think homosexuality is normal --- no

Do I think there is any religion that endorses it --- no

Do I think God sees sex strictly for pleasure any different --- nope on that also

 

 

115 posted on 12/04/2004 9:27:56 PM PST by sandviper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: texasborn1960

Lots of normal people 'talk about' sex ... couldn't resist that one.


116 posted on 12/04/2004 10:38:25 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Homosexuals are mostly hyper-sexualized in their behaviors. If children are raised in a hyper-sexualized environment, it effects their socialization as well as their sexualization. Homosexuality is deviant sexual identity accompanied in the vast majority of homosexuals with deviant sexual behavior, (in my books, pre-corrosive psych 'normalizations'), but any home where hyper-sexualization is influencing the child would be detrimental to the development of a noraml sexual and social persona.


117 posted on 12/04/2004 10:45:48 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: johnb838

Progress? nope...same problem manifesting itself in a different format ..thats all


118 posted on 12/04/2004 10:51:11 PM PST by hineybona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 82Marine89

I too have a sister who is "gay". Watching her "relationships" is enough of a reason for me to conclude it's unnatural. At one point it confused my sons because they believed that one of her aquaintences was their Aunt.

I made it abundantly clear in no uncertain terms that she means nothing to us. They are not quite old enough yet to understand what is going on though. I love my sister but I will not condone her sins anymore than my own.


119 posted on 12/04/2004 10:51:25 PM PST by kuma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
One of the things people miss about the stone-throwing parable is that the people standing around holding the stones were preachers involved in a plot to kill an innocent man.

Not to nitpick, but if you are going to debate the meaning of scripture, you might want to have a firmer grasp on what the bible actually says.
120 posted on 12/04/2004 11:48:16 PM PST by rusty millet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson