Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio To Go Through Statewide Vote Recount After All(Gag)
WCPO CINCINNATI ^ | 11/16/04 | AP STORY

Posted on 11/16/2004 2:42:43 PM PST by dinok

A statewide recount of the presidential vote appears inevitable after a pair of third-party candidates said they have collected enough money to pay for it.

The recount would be conducted after the election results are certified in early December.

Libertarian Michael Badnarik and the Green Party's David Cobb said on Monday they raised more than $150,000 in four days, mostly in small contributions.

Ohio law requires payment of $10 per precinct for a recount, or $113,600 statewide.

Badnarik and Cobb said they aren't trying to overturn President Bush's 136,000-vote victory in Ohio, but just want to ensure that all votes were counted properly in the face of concerns about Election Day irregularities.

(Excerpt) Read more at wcpo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: alreadycertified; brownshirtsforkerry; doublestandard; electionfraud; elections; greens; howtostealanelection; liberal; libertarian; libertarians; ohio; ohiofraud; ohiovotefraud; postelectionfraud; ratsbyothernames; rottenindenmark; votefraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-266 next last
To: Skylab

Sandusky Co's 56% for Bush is up 2% from 2000, essentially typical for the smaller counties in Ohio. Therefore, every indication is that, if there was a double count, it was probably a "non-biased" one. If both sides go down 10 percent, then Bush loses about 390 votes from his lead. This is exactly what these county boards are supposed to be doing right now...comparing votes counted to votes cast. BTW, the website I saw said that the county elections director was a DEM, the assistant was REPUB. You know, people make mistakes, and this doesn't look very much like a plot on either side.

What I haven't seen on here is that two counties have actually posted their official results (post overseas and post provisionals). There are a couple of interesting points about the data:

The total increase in votes is slightly larger than the number of provisionals, so the absentees are basically filling in for the disqualified provisionals. These were both smaller counties which have been having higher provisional qualification rates.

Secondly, Guess What! Bush carried the additonal votes in both counties. Gee, Republicans vote by provisional also (something some people have a hard time understanding). No Kerry 80 percent margin. However, Bush is running about 4.5% behind his voting day total in the provsionals. This is very consistent with what we've seen across the country. So, say Kerry gets a net gain of seven percent (that's what this would work out to) of, say 175,000 total valid provisional ballots plus valid overseas ballots. That works out to be 12,250. If you subtract 390 for the Sandusky error (if there really is an error), you get Bush's margin at 132,600 - 12,250 - 390 = 119,960. You can only get Bush losing 1,000 votes in Sandusky if you believe that, absent the error, Bush's margin did not increase over 2000. In any event, we can spin theories all we want, but the facts are that Kerry is not getting anywhere close to 80 percent of 100% qualified provisional ballots.


161 posted on 11/16/2004 4:31:03 PM PST by Okie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Bonaventure

"...You're right. It is simply insane to assume all 93,000 spoiled ballots will go to Kerry."


It is simply insane to assume that all 93,000 spoiled ballots will go to anyone. They are spoiled for a reason. A very low % will result in an actual vote.


162 posted on 11/16/2004 4:34:24 PM PST by tatown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: JonDavid

Sorry man, i hate to say it but your wrong again.

Ohio Law:

Any losing nominee or candidate in a primary, general, or special election can request a recount. Also, a group of five or more voters can request a recount on a question or issue. The recount process begins by filing a written application with the Board of Elections of each county in which votes are to be recounted. R.C. 3515.01. The application must be filed within five days after the results were declared. R.C. 3515.02. The application must also list each precinct within the county where votes are to be recounted, and for each precinct a $10 deposit must be paid. R.C. 3515.03.

----

The recount request must be filed within 5 days after the results are declared (certified).


163 posted on 11/16/2004 4:35:55 PM PST by BigRedState
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: tatown

Absolutely right. Why would anyone assume that the spoiled ballots will become "unspoiled"? Some of them will, I'm sure, but most of them won't.


164 posted on 11/16/2004 4:36:24 PM PST by Bonaventure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Bonaventure

Right .. they have to "Fan" the ballots and everytime they do that they dislodge more chads. So some votes will change.


165 posted on 11/16/2004 4:37:34 PM PST by BigRedState
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: eakole
It is possible that the democrat's and the third and party's intent to throw the Electoral College into turmoil by denying Bush Ohio's share of the vote.

Well, sure.. i.e. if Ohio's slate becomes "tainted" or challenged or whatever, then Bush is at 266 rather than 286, and is deprived of a majority.

But there's no "turmoil" in that, it just throws it into the House, which is (R) controlled. I don't see any conceivable way that this scenario would alter the outcome.

166 posted on 11/16/2004 4:37:56 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

It's not a hand recount. They recheck their numbers. That's what they do before they certify.


167 posted on 11/16/2004 4:39:32 PM PST by JonDavid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X

I disagree. If there spoiled ballots, they will not count.


168 posted on 11/16/2004 4:40:28 PM PST by JonDavid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: BigRedState

Last time I checked "fanning" was not allowed.. :0)


169 posted on 11/16/2004 4:40:53 PM PST by tatown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Okie2

Here's another new set of returns: Brown County:

Before
Bush 12,480
Kerry 7058
Provisionals listed 326

Provisionals + absentees added 249

After

Bush 12,647
Kerry 7,140

NO 100 % qualification
NO 80 percent Kerry margin


170 posted on 11/16/2004 4:41:57 PM PST by Okie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy
Actually, its' "disfranchisement". Florence King did a great article back in 2000 that opened with a paragraph or two regarding this. Of course, if it's wrong to use the "en" prefix in this instance, what about "disembowel"?
171 posted on 11/16/2004 4:44:11 PM PST by Cosmo (Got wood?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: weegee

This won't happen because there would be a real civil war.


172 posted on 11/16/2004 4:47:16 PM PST by JonDavid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: BigRedState

But if the votes are certified then it's moot.


173 posted on 11/16/2004 4:50:27 PM PST by JonDavid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

Read the article...they only pay a filing fee and some costs, about $113,000...the total costs, at least according to the article will be $1.5 million to the taxpayers of Ohio


174 posted on 11/16/2004 4:51:54 PM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: JonDavid

That's what I thought it was. So this is much about nothing?


175 posted on 11/16/2004 4:52:04 PM PST by JonDavid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Michigan? HOw about Pennsylvania? Kerry didn't win by much in PA, which is why the media called it for Kerry early on... if these so called Greenies REALLY wanted all votes to count, they'd look into Pennsylvania's vote..especially Philly where there were more ballots cast than people of voting age!
But then, they REALLY don't want that do they...


176 posted on 11/16/2004 4:55:27 PM PST by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: t2buckeye

Problems with the Detroit count. (Counters didn't care who saw them commit fraud)

http://www.nationalreview.com/battleground/battleground.asp


177 posted on 11/16/2004 4:57:05 PM PST by cripplecreek (I come swinging the olive branch of peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: JonDavid

No.. when SOS certifies the votes, thats it.. Unless there isa recount. The recount is to challenge that certification. Everything will be recounted.. after that it will be recertified.


178 posted on 11/16/2004 4:57:51 PM PST by BigRedState
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: dinok

I bet they got plenty of Dem donations.


179 posted on 11/16/2004 5:01:13 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Maybe Bush's vote total will increase!


180 posted on 11/16/2004 5:03:43 PM PST by My2Cents ("The bombing begins in five minutes...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-266 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson