Posted on 11/12/2004 11:24:19 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
News Alert: Scott Peterson Verdict to be announced today at 4:00 Eastern Time.
nancy was NEVER on Scott's side. EVER.
I'll Freepmail you of where you can send my check.
You know, I did hear 'something' about that during the course of this past year, but forgot about it. They never talked about it more then once, that I heard.
Pretty strange. HE'S pretty strange!
Hell, Durst even jumped bail before the trial.
And to top that, Durst was held without bond on the bail jumping and cutting up a dead body. By the time that trial came up, Deguerin got him off on time served.
Too bad for Scottie!
sw
Ok! Don't beat me up!
I already said several times that I didn't watch Nancy that much. But the few times I did catch her, it seemed to me that she felt that there wasn't enough evidence to convict Snott.
Then someone posted earlier that she was choking back tears when she was telling the verdict. I just assumed from what I witnessed with her and that she was crying, that she felt the verdict was not fair.
But like I said: what do I know. I don't watch Court TV. I stick to Fox.
I found both the OJ and Durst verdicts incredible.
And now Geragos refuses to even stand by his client. Some on Court TV were saying this is unheard of (unless there is some huge family emergency) when the client's life is at stake.
LOL! Good for that secretary.
Justin Falconer is a pompous @rse and just completed his 15 minutes of fame!
It's now over 2 hours after the verdict came in
Has anyone hear from MG yet and where he's at????
During dinner we listened to Joe Taccopino (sp?) go on at length about MG not being present during the verdict and the consensus was that it's simply inexcusable and there is no conceivable reason for his not being there. Joe said if his explanation is due to his involvement in the other case, it does not compare in severity and his place was beside his client as the verdict was read. I hope MG's days are numbered.
I think there are many here who are more relieved this is over than the election campaign.
I think that there was discussion yesterday on Court TV that Geragos was in LA today for a perliminary hearing and wouldn't be in Redwood City if the verdict came in. I guess that the Peterson's weren't paying him enough. They probably don't have anything left to mortgage.
Durst was a cross-dresser, so watch out for that sweet little old lady down the street, sometimes things aren't what they seem!
I think I heard that he was out of town and not going to be able to be present when the verdict was read.
He's passing out press releases that state that, yes, even after losing this case, the Winona Ryder case, and exhibiting an inability to free Susan McDougal from jail for months, Mark Geragos is a really, really good defense attorney!
Can somebody tell me where this guy got his reputation?
Nancy is a very PRO prosecution gal.
I haven't watched her lately but I know she is always against the defense because of something that happened in her life. I think it was a boyfriend that was killed.
I'm guessing the tears may have been for the proper verdict of this scumbag.
As was his absence during the verdict. Legal eagles on Court TV are all taking him to task for not being there to support his client while the verdict was read, adding the least he should do is to visit during the weekend and then get busy on the penalty phase.
Looks like the "joke" is on him. The arrogant psycho surely thought he would fool everybody and escape justice. Think again, Scotty. Enjoy cavorting with your butt-buddies until the day they slip in the needle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.