Skip to comments.
Privacy Experts Shun Black Boxes (electronic data recorders now mandatory in all cars)
FoxNews ^
| Nov. 11, 2004
| Kelley Beaucar Vlahos
Posted on 11/11/2004 8:04:52 AM PST by FairOpinion
Some safety and privacy experts are reacting with apprehension, others with all out condemnation over a recent ruling by the National Transportation Safety Board to require electronic data recorders or "black boxes" in all new cars manufactured in the United States.
"I take offense that this personal property of individuals is now being designed by the federal government," said Jim Harper, privacy attorney and editor of Privacilla.org.
EDRs are certainly not new. Information gathered on black boxes typically everything from speed, brake pressure, seat belt use and air bag deployment has already been used in determining guilt in criminal and civil cases across the country.
Privacy experts warn that once cars are outfitted for the most limited data recording, the government will find a way to argue its for drivers "own good" to collect more. They point to a push in recent years to install GPS in all cars so that emergency officials can easily find incapacitated accident victims.
"When you are telling someone it is for their own good, then it should be their own choice, they should be able to say no," said professor Yale Kamisar of the University of Michigan Law School. "None of these things work out the way they are supposed to. Why should we believe all of these assurances when they havent been honored in the past?"
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carindustry; cars; datarecorder; gps; ntsb; privacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-225 next last
To: tuffydoodle
I wouldn't care if it was on my vehicle as I have nothing to hide.
I don't like the suggestion that people should have no objection unless they're hiding something.
Maybe Tom Ridge should strip search you and give you a cavity probe at the airport. After all, you have nothing to hide, do you?
To: montag813
"We need to record all conversations within the 'cabin' to determine accidents which may have been caused by 'violence against a spouse'"It's also for the children
42
posted on
11/11/2004 8:38:14 AM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: blu
Neat to know. My newest vehicle is an '82 Harley. Everything else hails from the '70s.
43
posted on
11/11/2004 8:40:06 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(I'm from North Dakota and I'm all FOR Global Warming! Bring it ON!)
To: FairOpinion
When the part of the computer that control the shut off car mode fails and you are stranded.
Figure a large towing bill and a larger bill to replace the computer.
44
posted on
11/11/2004 8:42:25 AM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Dan Rather called Saddam "Mister President and President Bush "bush")
To: FairOpinion
I see a future in jamming equipment...
45
posted on
11/11/2004 8:42:52 AM PST
by
Flavius
("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
To: FairOpinion
1984 only missed it by 20 years. It sure looks like it.
46
posted on
11/11/2004 8:43:34 AM PST
by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: FairOpinion
The information about my driving habits is NONE OF THE GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS. Just a guess.
The insurance business has insurance lobbyists fighting trial attorney's via the congress.
To: FairOpinion
Nope not in my car.
My EE skills may come in handy.
BUMP
48
posted on
11/11/2004 8:46:53 AM PST
by
tm22721
(In fac they)
To: FairOpinion
The NTSB recommended...that black boxes be mandated..."We have a long history of using data recorders in other modes of transportation and found them extremely useful,"...pointing to aircraftSo I need a black box to help protect my vehicle from "sparks in the central fuel tank", right?
49
posted on
11/11/2004 8:50:51 AM PST
by
gnarledmaw
(I traded freedom for security and all I got were these damned shackles.)
Comment #50 Removed by Moderator
To: George W. Bush
Oh man, I had a daydream about that very scenario just this morning. wooo woooo!!
To: KevinDavis
>>>I agree with you on the Government part. They have no business in my car at all...
I agree with you that they have no business in your car. But that would only be if it remains in your driveway.
The government does have the "business" of regulating it once it leaves your driveway and takes to the public, and therefore the government's streets. This is no different than licensing of drivers, registration of vehicles or even traffics laws. Once the "the people" make traffic and safety laws through the legislative process, it becomes the duty of the government through the executive process to equitably enforce the laws. And since a large portion of our public can no longer be counted on to be responsible for its individual actions, the government must
be thrust into the role of regulator.
It is not the car that speeds, zig-zags and weaves in and out of traffic with reckless abandon and at the peril of everyone else in the vicinity, it is the driver. And what better way to help us good drivers than to have a "black box" in every car. What are you afraid of?
To: RinkRat23
Here comes the flames, buddy! Duck!!!
(by the way, I absolutely agree with you)
To: FairOpinion
Here's a question: Is it possible to disable this without harming the vehicle or the gov't knowing you did so?
54
posted on
11/11/2004 9:24:11 AM PST
by
ExSoldier
(Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
To: tuffydoodle
Actually, people who think as you do have something hide. You should hide the fact that you have absolutely no respect for the First and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution.
A website dedicated to freedom is not the place to advocate cowardly obeisance to government intrusion on our privacy.
55
posted on
11/11/2004 9:43:09 AM PST
by
jjmcgo
To: BenLurkin
But these boxes will slow down lawsuits from greedy plaintiffs who injure themselves while driving recklessly. When these folks try to claim they were going "about the speed limit", we will be able to do more than just roll our eyes and sigh. With all due respect, they won't.
I have to get to work so I'll try give a quick example:
About six-seven years ago there was a guy who was driving a Chevy Blazer, had an accident, rolled over, door opened, he was thrown out and injured, sued G.M. and was awarded something like $35 million. However, the guy was DRUNK - as he was CONVICTED of DUI at the time, he also admitted in court he was not wearing his seat belt AND also admitted he didn't have the door locked. The JURY still found G.M. at fault!
G.M. naturally appealed and I don't know that outcome. But the point is NOTHING will stop idiot juries from giving some other idiot a big sack of money. I don't even think tort reform would apply/help here. Only having JUDGES that won't let stuff like this see the light of day will help.
56
posted on
11/11/2004 9:43:36 AM PST
by
Condor51
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
To: Porterville
>>This won't last<<
Taking bets? I've got a C-Note here.
57
posted on
11/11/2004 9:47:46 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
(A lack of alcohol in my coffee is forcing me to see reality!)
To: KevinDavis
>>I have no problem with Car Rental companies doing it...<<
Even if they don't tell you about it first?
58
posted on
11/11/2004 9:49:42 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
(A lack of alcohol in my coffee is forcing me to see reality!)
To: FairOpinion
If the gov. and auto shops can read this info, whats to stop us from reading it and then erasing it.
If there is a law about having to have one of these tings, there could be a device that plugs in and erases all the data. So if you were in a crash plug it in hit delete. Play dumb "data gone? I do not know I was just in a car wreak"
59
posted on
11/11/2004 9:57:15 AM PST
by
Veloxherc
(To go up pull back, to go down pull back all the way.)
To: FairOpinion
Yet this kind of stuff keeps being decided, without any outcry from anyone.When you keep being told that everything the government does is "for your own good", many people begin to believe that.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-225 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson