Posted on 10/31/2004 12:45:51 PM PST by coffee260
Since new CIA Director Porter Goss blocked the October Surprise agency left-wingers had prepared against Bush (discussed in “Porter At The Pass” last week), they desperately rigged another one, working with Mohammad ElBaradei at the UN.
What nobody is focusing on in Al Qaqaagate is that the CIA is behind it. The anti-Bush lefties are now known as the “Rogue Weasels” at Langley, and they are frantic to do whatever they can to elect Kerry. They cooked up this entire phony “tons of missing explosives” scandal, sweet-talked the head of the UN’s nuclear inspection agency, ElBaradei, to carry their water and leak it to CBS -- which drooled at the opportunity to spring the story on election eve. They then briefed Kerry and prepared his instant assault on Bush once the surprise broke.
But some clever pro-Bush Langley folks, seeing they couldn’t spike the story at CBS, sweet-talked the New York Times into jumping the gun, spoiling the surprise and giving the Bush campaign time to tear the phony scandal apart. Then they leaked it to Drudge, whose website promptly blew the lid off the whole scam.
The Al Qaqaa scandal (the site of the “missing” explosives in Iraq is named Al Qaqaa – isn’t that just too beautiful?) becomes Al Qaqaagate, and Kerry ends up looking like the opportunist fool he is, so clueless he doesn’t realize he’s accusing American soldiers in Iraq of “incredible incompetence” rather than Bush.
This was the last gasp of the Rogue Weasels. Porter’s Purge is coming – upwards of eighty Bush-hating left-wing Kerry stooges are going to be fired at the CIA in November. Looks like the pro-America guys are going to be running the Company once again.
I disagree that he should have gotten rid of tenet right away. The left bragged that they had left little time-bombs all over the place for the Bush administration and that there was no way they'd be able to find them all. It was better for the people like tenet who helped enable the osamas to take the blame for their own messes, than have the left screaming 'miserable failure' at a Bush appointee.
Are ye nuts? Where's any substantiation? Anybody can say anything but to get any respect, you gotta back it up. I don't see any back-up.
There may be some at the agency who are working against Bush but a Kerry election spells a bloodletting within the intelligence community not seen since 74' & 75'. In fact Biden, who is speculated to take control within the intelligence hierarchy under a Kerry administration catastrophe, was instrumental in pushing through much of the legislation which not only de-fanged and raped the CIA but neutered the entire community.
I second that emotion - Thanks for the 411
I had heard from Bill Gertz that the Cia was out to get Bush out of office but I didn't hear specifics.
Last night, Fox had a very short report that one last "chapter" is left to be published in the 9/11 Commissions report but that it was still being "vetted" or something and it wouldn't be released until after the election. They didn't make a big deal about it - it was kind of a matter of fact story.
Do you think this is being held back by Goss also?
Heard on Drudge that Kerry will get rid of Porter Goss and install Bob Graham as CIA chief --- that nut!
Believe me, this rogue group wants Kerry. Well, ABB, anyway.
You sound as if you are an insider. Your info doesn't surprise me given what I've read of Milroie's books. It does make me very, very angry.
Well, thank you for a sane 'voice' in this group. Geeze, just about everyone here believes this without question. Am I in a dimocrat site by mistake?
You may not be concerned who leaked her name but the dems want to use it as a sledgehammer against Bush. If fact, that is what I have been dreading would come out as an October surprise against Bush. Remember, there was a report just a couple weeks ago that Rove was interviwed by Justice for 2 hours. I thought then that the timing was getting just a little to close to elections to be bringing that subject up in the media again.
FOX NEWS JUST BROKE IN WITH A NEW ALERT: WASHINGTON REDSKINS WON THE GAME SO THEREFORE NONE OF US HAVE TO GO VOTE ON TUESDAY
My understanding is that the CIA has been run by the analysts instead of the agents. It has become a festering abcess where the leadership is more concerned with covering their butts than spying.
These people are so concerned with covering their *sses, that they care much less about the real business of the CIA. I can easily see where they would prefer a Kerry to a Bush - Kerry will do nothing to pressure them to get back to spying and honoring agents. Bush will, hence his choice of Porter Goss.
Why are you so skeptical ? I have heard this stuff from a lot of different sources, like I mentioned before: Bill Gertz said in on Rush's show a few weeks ago. I'm thinking Cliff May may have written along these lines.
Why would it have to be a democrat that would theorize that the CIA was against Bush. He is known for runnning a tight-lipped administration and yet it seems like the last 6 months there is report after report that was "leaked".
bump
Ya gotta do it or it comes back to haunt ya!
Believe me, I'm well aware of the dems and their machinations in that area. I follow that story very closely indeed.
I was asking the poster about an area of concern to me and clarifying I wasn't after the dem angle.
And your PROOF is?
So9
A very reliable scource with impeccable credentials.
Former aid to President Reagan Dr. Jack Wheeler.
"I don't know if Jack Wheeler is legitimate."
Nobody who calls the CIA "the Company" is legit.
Also, nobody who thinks 80 CIA employees could be "purged."
If you give his name and a quote, that may be proof, if he is honest.
If you don't it is only what the DemonRats call proof, that is to say, rumor.
So9
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.