Posted on 10/09/2004 8:54:05 AM PDT by Heff
Election 2004
Date Bush Kerry Today 49.6 45.9
(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...
CINO, Catholic in name only. V's wife.
Maybe next time he takes boy Kerry to the Woodshed. V's wife.
I wish Bush would have said:
After September 11th, I now realize it is naive to make pledges like that. I can't predict the future, I can't predict that world conditions will remain the same over the next four years, and I can't guarantee that a raise in taxes won't become necessary for the good of the country at some point. But what I will pledge is that I will do everything in my power to keep everyone's taxes as low as possible, as long as it is not detrimental to the country's long-term well-being. I hope you will respect the fact that I'm being as honest and straightforward as possible here, rather than trying to buy your vote by making a promise that I may or may not be able to keep, which is what my opponent has just done.
However, I don't know if Bush made those very same "promises" during his campaigns (either this one or the first one).... so it may have been a flip flop if he had said that. LOL
Rassmussen job approval: 53%
Zogby is a Palestinian apologist, anti-Semite, and Bush hater. His poll is sh*t.
"Bush bounce? That's a pleasant thought in more ways than one."
Dammit. You owe me a keyboard!
Add...
*haughtily denigrated every American sitting in last night's debate audience by stating only Kerry, Bush and Gibson earn $200,000 or would ever earn that amount.
King Kerry obliterates the American Dream for the clanging masses of riff-raff.
He's such a prig.
A_R
I own about $1000 worth of Weyerhauser through a mutual fund. Guess that makes me one of Bush's fellow "timber barons" and "despoilers of the environment!" 8*)
No, just a Blue State snooze.
Enjoyed your writing.
I think last night Bush owned the woodshed.
I hope at least ten people in the audience earned over $200K a year.
i must admit, i'm fond of the game collapse.
You bring up an interesting point, Timbuck2. Remember how everyone was screaming how badly Dubya did at the first debate? And how, while he did MUCH better at the second one, he still let certain things go unreplied-to?
Is it possible that the always-misunderestimated Dubya has been forcing Kerry to expend all his ammo -- and now, Dubya goes into the third debate with plenty of things to shoot down Kerry with?
Keeping in mind that Rasmussen over samples Democrats by 4% to compensate for estimated fraud, the numbers are real good. Burr is actually leading in NC, hurray! I was worried about that race. I think Bush can now pull him over the top.
Ok, well I'm going to make a controversial and off-topic statement:
If people like you believe it's ok for OUR politicians to vote on their Religious beliefs, then why do so many of you same people believe it is NOT ok for Islamic radicals to rule based on THEIR Religious beliefs?????
I believe in separation of Church and State (not to the exclusion of "God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, or the removal of the Ten Commandments from public buildings [because those things are traditions/institutions]).... and I DON'T want someone voting against Scientific Facts based on Religious "beliefs" (which are not always the same as facts). People either have morals or they don't. Government can't and shouldn't try to legislate morals.
(Told you it was a controversial statement!)
But back to the topic of the thread -- GREAT to see Rassmussen's numbers for the Electoral College votes. :-)
Hey Kerry, Need some wood? Bush has got it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.