Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ah. ha! Geneologists discover that John Kerry is a descendant of Mohammed
The Washington Times ^ | October 1, 2004 | John McCaslin

Posted on 10/01/2004 6:55:16 AM PDT by Jacksonville Patriot

Walking U.N. Perhaps Sen. John Kerry does have an advantage after all over President Bush in understanding the complex political issues of the Middle East. New research by Burke's Peerage reveals that Mr. Kerry is the only presidential candidate in U.S. history who has genealogical descent from Muslims, Jews and Christians. "Senator Kerry ... is a virtual walking United Nations," says Harold Brooks-Baker, publishing director of Burke's. Mr. Kerry is kinsman of the Shi'ite shahs of Persia (the most famous was Shah Abbas I, who reigned from 1587 to 1629), as well as the Muslim kings of Tunisia, all of whom — Democratic presidential nominee included — descend from the prophet Muhammad.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 2004; 200410; 2004election; election2004; genealogy; geneology; helixmakemineadouble; iran; irandeal; islam; johnkerry; kerry; libmyths; lurch; massachusetts; pruneface; tunisia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
It's just some more funny Kerriana. Chill, everyone.
1 posted on 10/01/2004 6:55:17 AM PDT by Jacksonville Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

This is ridiculous. It's a matter of statistical certainty that almost everyone alive in America today is descended from Christians, Jews, and Muslims.


2 posted on 10/01/2004 6:58:26 AM PDT by SedVictaCatoni (Z '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

LOL!!!

In my speedreading, I thought your head line read:

"GYNOcologists discover that John Kerry is a descendant of Mohammed."

Maybe it would help him with the women's vote.


3 posted on 10/01/2004 7:00:22 AM PDT by harrycarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni

You are correct sir.

Since we all decend from Adam, then technically we are all related...


4 posted on 10/01/2004 7:00:41 AM PDT by DSBull (Truth is the light of the World, shine it everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

Mohammed! You are a madman! When you stole that horse? And you made it with the horse? I wanna party with you.


5 posted on 10/01/2004 7:03:09 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

So what is the purpose of this "news" article?????


6 posted on 10/01/2004 7:04:07 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

I better not be descended from muhammed. I will be very angry with my ancestors if i am.


7 posted on 10/01/2004 7:06:21 AM PDT by modest proposal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot
Ah. ha! Geneologists discover that John Kerry is a descendant of Mohammed

As someone said about John Kerry, "Slap a beard and turban on him and whattaya got?"
8 posted on 10/01/2004 7:06:54 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

This must be satire. Kerry's paternal ancestors were Jews from Central Europe, his maternal ancestors were predominantly English. Any genetic connection with the Middle East on his father's side would have to date before the Diaspora of 70 AD, at which time the Muslim religion did not exist. If there is any connection with any Middle Eastern royal dynasties, it must be very remote.


9 posted on 10/01/2004 7:07:02 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot
This ia a link to an extensive Kerry ancestry page. A lot of interesting names appear.

http://hometown.aol.com/wreitwiesn/candidates2004/kerry.html

10 posted on 10/01/2004 7:16:52 AM PDT by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
"So what is the purpose of this "news" article?????"

===================================================================

The pupose is called "knowledge".

You ought to try it sometime.

11 posted on 10/01/2004 7:18:28 AM PDT by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

IF Robin Williams had his political head on straight -- which he does not -- can you imagine what he could do with this material?


12 posted on 10/01/2004 7:27:19 AM PDT by Rightfootforward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni

Sorry - no Muslims in my line - no way.

Kerry may howver, have Neanderthal ancestors - notice his jaw line?


13 posted on 10/01/2004 7:30:17 AM PDT by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot
Mr. Kerry is kinsman...(snip)...the Muslim kings of Tunisia, all of whom —
Democratic presidential nominee included — descend from the prophet Muhammad.


Another example of the influence of genetics on behaviour...
like Mohammed, Kerry married an older, richer woman...
14 posted on 10/01/2004 7:32:41 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

The apple didn't fall far from the tree, obviously.

Bad seed.


15 posted on 10/01/2004 7:40:44 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DSBull
Since we all decend from Adam, then technically we are all related..

If this is true then how did Cain find a wife in the land of Nod?

16 posted on 10/01/2004 7:54:14 AM PDT by rubofthebrush (I wondered how tomorrow could ever follow today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rubofthebrush

More children of Adam, remember the prohibition against marrying one's relatives was NOT given until Moses! Reason: No genetic damage could occur, since at that time our genes were still "cleaner" - that is, the combined consequences of sin were not yet written all over our genes....for example today drug use can cause genetic damage, which when combined with someone whose genetic makeup is similar, will cause damaged offspring......


17 posted on 10/01/2004 7:58:53 AM PDT by BereanBrain (BereanBrain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rubofthebrush
Jewish genealogy never lists all the family members. Only the important ones. Some theologians believe that Adam and Eve had numerous children who had numerous children.

Even if you don't believe in the bible and believe that we all evolved from primordial slime, then my assertion is still accurate only we are all related to slime, some more than others...
18 posted on 10/01/2004 7:59:12 AM PDT by DSBull (Truth is the light of the World, shine it everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jacksonville Patriot

Now how could a gynecologist determine that?


19 posted on 10/01/2004 8:01:43 AM PDT by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Mohammed died in 632 AD, or 1372 years ago. Assuming 24 years per generation, that's about 55 intervening generations to the present.

Two to the power of 54 (because that's 54 generations before you) is a number considerably in excess of a trillion. Therefore, it is more or less a statistical certainty that you are descended from Mohammed himself, let alone some person in the interval who followed his religion.*

That is why these stories of "Bush discovered to be descended from Julius Caesar!" are stupid - everybody else is descended from Caesar, and William the Conqueror, and King Herod too. If you don't believe me, go to the LDS geneaology site at http://www.lds.org and start going back through the generations yourself. I'm descended from Ivan the Terrible - and so are you.

* The only exception would be if you were wholly descended from some isolated ethnic group, such as the Maoris or the Yanomamos. This is extremely unlikely, especially in the modern world.


20 posted on 10/01/2004 8:02:39 AM PDT by SedVictaCatoni (Z '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson