Posted on 09/21/2004 4:47:21 PM PDT by Henchster
Shortly after the 2002 election, after watching the cadaver Lautenberg easily win after Torricelli had been way behind, I realized that assault on democracy, which well call the Torch Lighting, was simply a dry run for the real thing in 2004.
Everyone knows Hillary wants to be Queen, and not just of New York. Yet even Hillary the Vain knows she cant survive a year-long campaign, either her mouth or her past would catch up to her, and that would be the end of that. No, she needs a dramatically shortened campaign season to be successful.
How amazing that first Howard Dean and the other Dem hopefuls go down in flames, and Kerry, whose own campaign was on verge of collapse in December, rises up to be the nominee.
How convenient that Kerry emphasizes his brief Vietnam history, as flawed as it is, to focus his attacks on President Bushs Guard service. And yet, he flip-flopped from being for the war when he seeking the nomination, to being against it, and attacking the President on his Iraq War policy.
How ironic that Kerrys own service record falls apart under scrutiny, and his own campaign gets caught in a forged military records scandal.
These are NOT coincidences. Behind the scenes, for the last four years, the Clintons have been charting the course, picking the players, setting the policy, and tracking the results. When Dean looked poised to run away with the nomination, the Clintons whispered into the ears of fatcats in smokey back rooms that maybe they should get on the Kerry wagon, and Dean was gone faster than you could say YEEEAAAARRRGGGHH! Remember though, it wasnt the Dean-Scream that caused his plunge, the scream was the result of the Clinton influence that worked the least-liked, most wishy-washy, dopey, overly nuanced dork of the whole bunch from worst to first. Even Kucinich had more gravitas.
And now, the Clintons are ready, and in the perfect position, for the biggest power-play of their lives. The Torch Lighting of Kerry has started, and it will only be days before you begin to hear the grumblings of the liberal masses that Kerry is a loser, and maybe should be replaced. Once the media even starts to talk about the story, Kerry is French toast, and the move to replace Kerry with Hillary will be all but complete, with just the coronation speech to cap it off.
Heres my comment in August on the following post. Its worked out so far, and theres no reason to believe the Clintons would stop now:
1) Next week, RNC convention and very Presidential speech net Bush a 10 point lead in some polls.
2) Sep 5-15. Kerry continues to flip-flop, and get caught in more lies about his Vietnam "service."
3) Sep 15-25. Media covers Kerry implosion 24/7. Dems panic, launch "Torricelli Switch" trial balloon.
4) Sep 25-30. Kerry, under pressure from every side, drops out for X reason. (X = health, family, ?whatever dumb thing Kerry thinks of?)
5) Oct 1. Hillary "drafted" by Dems, makes droning "Ya know" speech. Liberal media go nuts, 24/7 Hillary love fest begins.
6) Month of Oct. Hillary gets clobbered by Bush in debates - liberal media still oozes Clinton DNA over her "Strong performances."
7) Nov 2. Hillary wins by narrow margin as liberal precincts around the country report record turnout - 150-200% in some cases.
Don't laugh, she's running THIS year. Everything is perfectly aligned, just as the Clintons have planned it since January 2001.
Be afraid, be VERY afraid.
9 posted on 08/26/2004 10:27:43 AM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies |Report Abuse ]
OK, things are going precisely as they have planned it, so what can us Freepers do to wreck this train before it even leaves the station?
Get the word out. Tell your friends, relatives, and especially, any news types you know. We need the story that Hillary is waiting to replace Kerry to be out there BEFORE it happens. That eliminates the media excitement factor to a degree.
Keep our eyes open for signs. Signs of a candidate in such deep trouble, hes starting to inflate the life raft.
Signs like:
Campaign stop or fundraiser cancellations. Post these ASAP and imply that Kerry is dropping out and will be replaced by Hillary any moment now.
Associates distancing themselves from Kerry. Like Edwards has already done! Michael Moore made some comments on how Kerry is a loser, but theyre stuck with him, so they need to make the best of it. Comments like that are just one short step away from abandonment.
Dont be complacent that Hillary cant win. Shell get virtually every vote that Gore got in 2000, plus a few female Bush voters who will vote for her just because shes a woman, and dont forget that vote fraud, theres no way theyll mess up again like they did in Florida by spiking the Buchanan hole instead of the Gore one.
I repeat, you're whole premise is based on blistering ignorance of the laws of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, which laws determine how the Electoral College is chosen and how those members cast their votes. And if you want to know who I am or what I've done, look me up on FR or on the Net.
I know this subject. You do not. Quit offering false comments to the FR community.
Billybob
If K*rry were to win, there's nothing preventing his electors from voting for H*ll*ry in the Electoral College.
If you overestimate someone's power to the point of irrationality, it's usually due to fear.
I don't think it even has to be that difficult. If she decides she wants to run, a gazillion liberal lawyers are going to challenge every state law to get her on the ballot.
There's no way they won't be successful in "giving the people a choice" (Puke!) and Bingo!, she's on, and good to go.
OK, but what if candidate Kerry happened to die, he would certainly be replaced then, would he not?
I don't think Hillary will run.
Everything is perfectly aligned for an "alternative candidate" to replace Kerry at this stage. Just look back to McGovern replacing Eagleton AFTER the convention for a precedent.
Seriously... 15 years ago would you have ever thought people could die like flys around a sitting president and not raise a peep from MSM? Or same MSM would trot out documents a third grader could see as fakes for a hit piece???
No way, Dean, despite the whackyness, is a far more likeable charachter and doesn't have the Lurch factor dogging him :-)
THAT's why the Clintons picked Lurch, they knew he was as exciting as a piece of wet toast, er FRENCH toast.
There certainly HAVE been "unfaithful" electors in the past. Surely you do not deny that.
According to a chart that I saw (although it is not current), there were 30 states that did NOT legally bind their electors. Has this changed that much?
Then there is the situation of Kerry withdrawing or being unavailable (for whatever reason), certainly he would have to be replaced by someone.
This is ridiculous. Kerry will remain the Democratic
candidate, and the election will probably end up close.
Let's not waste time and energy on pointless speculation.
Let's just work hard ... as Ronald Reagan said, "as if we're one vote behind."
We'll be more than one point behnd if the Queen decides it's her time. The liberal media will anoint her, and it will be up to us to convince the American sheeple that she's the curse.
How certain am of this? I'll leave FR forever,if your and your brain-dead supposition is correct.But YOU must leave if I am correct.
Deal?
If your theory is happening, I think Lurch goes down in a plane crash or similar. That solves the ballot BS and engenders a sympathy vote too...
Perhaps, but her time would be 2008, not this year.
The deadline to run has come and gone. What you're suggesting is impossible.
"But now, unless they found Kerry lying face down in Ft. Marcy Park, I don't think so."
What is one more addition to the Klintoon Body Count list? Not like it hasn't been done b4....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.