Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HILLARY'S COUP D'ETAT! (Hillary to Replace Kerry)
HenchPAC Exclusive ^ | 09/21/04 | Henchster

Posted on 09/21/2004 4:47:21 PM PDT by Henchster

Shortly after the 2002 election, after watching the cadaver Lautenberg easily win after Torricelli had been way behind, I realized that assault on democracy, which we’ll call the “Torch Lighting,” was simply a dry run for the real thing in 2004.

Everyone knows Hillary wants to be Queen, and not just of New York. Yet even Hillary the Vain knows she can’t survive a year-long campaign, either her mouth or her past would catch up to her, and that would be the end of that. No, she needs a dramatically shortened campaign season to be successful.

How amazing that first Howard Dean and the other Dem hopefuls go down in flames, and Kerry, whose own campaign was on verge of collapse in December, rises up to be the nominee.

How convenient that Kerry emphasizes his brief Vietnam history, as flawed as it is, to focus his attacks on President Bush’s Guard service. And yet, he flip-flopped from being for the war when he seeking the nomination, to being against it, and attacking the President on his Iraq War policy.

How ironic that Kerry’s own service record falls apart under scrutiny, and his own campaign gets caught in a forged military records scandal.

These are NOT coincidences. Behind the scenes, for the last four years, the Clintons have been charting the course, picking the players, setting the policy, and tracking the results. When Dean looked poised to run away with the nomination, the Clintons whispered into the ears of fatcats in smokey back rooms that maybe they should get on the Kerry wagon, and Dean was gone faster than you could say “YEEEAAAARRRGGGHH!” Remember though, it wasn’t the Dean-Scream that caused his plunge, the scream was the result – of the Clinton influence that worked the least-liked, most wishy-washy, dopey, overly nuanced dork of the whole bunch from worst to first. Even Kucinich had more gravitas.

And now, the Clintons are ready, and in the perfect position, for the biggest power-play of their lives. The “Torch Lighting” of Kerry has started, and it will only be days before you begin to hear the grumblings of the liberal masses that Kerry is a loser, and maybe should be replaced. Once the media even starts to talk about the story, Kerry is French toast, and the move to replace Kerry with Hillary will be all but complete, with just the coronation speech to cap it off.

Here’s my comment in August on the following post. It’s worked out so far, and there’s no reason to believe the Clintons would stop now:

FR Thread

1) Next week, RNC convention and very Presidential speech net Bush a 10 point lead in some polls.

2) Sep 5-15. Kerry continues to flip-flop, and get caught in more lies about his Vietnam "service."

3) Sep 15-25. Media covers Kerry implosion 24/7. Dems panic, launch "Torricelli Switch" trial balloon.

4) Sep 25-30. Kerry, under pressure from every side, drops out for X reason. (X = health, family, ?whatever dumb thing Kerry thinks of?)

5) Oct 1. Hillary "drafted" by Dems, makes droning "Ya know" speech. Liberal media go nuts, 24/7 Hillary love fest begins.

6) Month of Oct. Hillary gets clobbered by Bush in debates - liberal media still oozes Clinton DNA over her "Strong performances."

7) Nov 2. Hillary wins by narrow margin as liberal precincts around the country report record turnout - 150-200% in some cases.

Don't laugh, she's running THIS year. Everything is perfectly aligned, just as the Clintons have planned it since January 2001.

Be afraid, be VERY afraid.

9 posted on 08/26/2004 10:27:43 AM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies |Report Abuse ]

OK, things are going precisely as they have planned it, so what can us Freepers do to wreck this train before it even leaves the station?

Get the word out. Tell your friends, relatives, and especially, any news types you know. We need the story that Hillary is waiting to replace Kerry to be out there BEFORE it happens. That eliminates the media excitement factor to a degree.

Keep our eyes open for signs. Signs of a candidate in such deep trouble, he’s starting to inflate the life raft.

Signs like:

Campaign stop or fundraiser cancellations. Post these ASAP and imply that Kerry is dropping out and will be replaced by Hillary any moment now.

Associates distancing themselves from Kerry. Like Edwards has already done! Michael Moore made some comments on how Kerry is a loser, but they’re stuck with him, so they need to make the best of it. Comments like that are just one short step away from abandonment.

Don’t be complacent that Hillary can’t win. She’ll get virtually every vote that Gore got in 2000, plus a few female Bush voters who will vote for her just because she’s a woman, and don’t forget that vote fraud, there’s no way they’ll mess up again like they did in Florida by spiking the Buchanan hole instead of the Gore one.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: clinton; elections; hillary; kerry; l00pythe0ry; scaretactics; tinfoil; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-288 next last
To: Henchster
My Lord, you ARE clueless. Suffice to say, I have represented candidates for President in the US Supreme Court and state supreme courts on the subject of their access to the ballot beginning in 1972 and continuing to 2004. In the first one, I represented both Dr. Benjamin Spock and George Wallace. In this year I have represented Ralph Nader. In 2000 I represented the interests of a candidate even you may have heard of -- George Bush.

I repeat, you're whole premise is based on blistering ignorance of the laws of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, which laws determine how the Electoral College is chosen and how those members cast their votes. And if you want to know who I am or what I've done, look me up on FR or on the Net.

I know this subject. You do not. Quit offering false comments to the FR community.

Billybob

201 posted on 09/21/2004 10:12:57 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper; Henchster

If K*rry were to win, there's nothing preventing his electors from voting for H*ll*ry in the Electoral College.


202 posted on 09/21/2004 10:24:42 PM PDT by Virginia-American (What do you call an honest creationist? An evolutionist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian

If you overestimate someone's power to the point of irrationality, it's usually due to fear.


203 posted on 09/21/2004 10:26:58 PM PDT by stands2reason (Limousine Liberal--a man who has his cake, eats his cake, and complains that other people have cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Virginia-American
You're going to get a BIG argument from "congressman" billybob.

I don't think it even has to be that difficult. If she decides she wants to run, a gazillion liberal lawyers are going to challenge every state law to get her on the ballot.

There's no way they won't be successful in "giving the people a choice" (Puke!) and Bingo!, she's on, and good to go.

204 posted on 09/21/2004 10:28:12 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

OK, but what if candidate Kerry happened to die, he would certainly be replaced then, would he not?


205 posted on 09/21/2004 10:31:10 PM PDT by sd-joe (Rather ... a cartoon caricature of liberal bias. (Can you say "hidden agenda"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

I don't think Hillary will run.


206 posted on 09/21/2004 10:33:32 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
I'm not saying it's certain, but it's certainly plausible at this stage.

Everything is perfectly aligned for an "alternative candidate" to replace Kerry at this stage. Just look back to McGovern replacing Eagleton AFTER the convention for a precedent.

207 posted on 09/21/2004 10:37:11 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Ironclad

Seriously... 15 years ago would you have ever thought people could die like flys around a sitting president and not raise a peep from MSM? Or same MSM would trot out documents a third grader could see as fakes for a hit piece???


208 posted on 09/21/2004 10:43:46 PM PDT by Axenolith (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TheEngineer

No way, Dean, despite the whackyness, is a far more likeable charachter and doesn't have the Lurch factor dogging him :-)


209 posted on 09/21/2004 10:50:17 PM PDT by Axenolith (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

THAT's why the Clintons picked Lurch, they knew he was as exciting as a piece of wet toast, er FRENCH toast.


210 posted on 09/21/2004 10:52:49 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

There certainly HAVE been "unfaithful" electors in the past. Surely you do not deny that.

According to a chart that I saw (although it is not current), there were 30 states that did NOT legally bind their electors. Has this changed that much?

Then there is the situation of Kerry withdrawing or being unavailable (for whatever reason), certainly he would have to be replaced by someone.


211 posted on 09/21/2004 10:53:07 PM PDT by sd-joe (Rather ... a cartoon caricature of liberal bias. (Can you say "hidden agenda"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: everyone

This is ridiculous. Kerry will remain the Democratic
candidate, and the election will probably end up close.

Let's not waste time and energy on pointless speculation.
Let's just work hard ... as Ronald Reagan said, "as if we're one vote behind."


212 posted on 09/21/2004 10:56:58 PM PDT by California Patriot (California Patriot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot

We'll be more than one point behnd if the Queen decides it's her time. The liberal media will anoint her, and it will be up to us to convince the American sheeple that she's the curse.


213 posted on 09/21/2004 10:59:51 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Jim Hill
Yes, it's there.

Up until the convention, why not keep her bets on the table, but face cards down?

The demo convention was great, wasn't good, but it wasn't a disaster (at least until the repubbie convention showed that a bounce was possible from a good showing and a credible candidate!) for Kerry.

Once he pulled ahead, and once Clarke's campaign died a quick death, her fate this time (unless VP) was dead.

Why not VP?

I think she should have.

She chose not to.

We will see in 2008 if the media can carry her water.

Dan Rather already failed one test.
214 posted on 09/21/2004 11:00:05 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
For the several millionth time... HILLARY IS NOT RUNNING,NOR IS SHE GOING TO REPLACE ANYONE !

How certain am of this? I'll leave FR forever,if your and your brain-dead supposition is correct.But YOU must leave if I am correct.

Deal?

215 posted on 09/21/2004 11:03:58 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

If your theory is happening, I think Lurch goes down in a plane crash or similar. That solves the ballot BS and engenders a sympathy vote too...


216 posted on 09/21/2004 11:05:11 PM PDT by Axenolith (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

Perhaps, but her time would be 2008, not this year.


217 posted on 09/21/2004 11:05:19 PM PDT by California Patriot (California Patriot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

The deadline to run has come and gone. What you're suggesting is impossible.


218 posted on 09/21/2004 11:05:27 PM PDT by ableChair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evolved_rage
There is absolutely NO WAY that she could be on the ballot in ANY state now;none.
219 posted on 09/21/2004 11:05:33 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner

"But now, unless they found Kerry lying face down in Ft. Marcy Park, I don't think so."

What is one more addition to the Klintoon Body Count list? Not like it hasn't been done b4....


220 posted on 09/21/2004 11:06:00 PM PDT by griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-288 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson