Posted on 09/21/2004 4:47:21 PM PDT by Henchster
Shortly after the 2002 election, after watching the cadaver Lautenberg easily win after Torricelli had been way behind, I realized that assault on democracy, which well call the Torch Lighting, was simply a dry run for the real thing in 2004.
Everyone knows Hillary wants to be Queen, and not just of New York. Yet even Hillary the Vain knows she cant survive a year-long campaign, either her mouth or her past would catch up to her, and that would be the end of that. No, she needs a dramatically shortened campaign season to be successful.
How amazing that first Howard Dean and the other Dem hopefuls go down in flames, and Kerry, whose own campaign was on verge of collapse in December, rises up to be the nominee.
How convenient that Kerry emphasizes his brief Vietnam history, as flawed as it is, to focus his attacks on President Bushs Guard service. And yet, he flip-flopped from being for the war when he seeking the nomination, to being against it, and attacking the President on his Iraq War policy.
How ironic that Kerrys own service record falls apart under scrutiny, and his own campaign gets caught in a forged military records scandal.
These are NOT coincidences. Behind the scenes, for the last four years, the Clintons have been charting the course, picking the players, setting the policy, and tracking the results. When Dean looked poised to run away with the nomination, the Clintons whispered into the ears of fatcats in smokey back rooms that maybe they should get on the Kerry wagon, and Dean was gone faster than you could say YEEEAAAARRRGGGHH! Remember though, it wasnt the Dean-Scream that caused his plunge, the scream was the result of the Clinton influence that worked the least-liked, most wishy-washy, dopey, overly nuanced dork of the whole bunch from worst to first. Even Kucinich had more gravitas.
And now, the Clintons are ready, and in the perfect position, for the biggest power-play of their lives. The Torch Lighting of Kerry has started, and it will only be days before you begin to hear the grumblings of the liberal masses that Kerry is a loser, and maybe should be replaced. Once the media even starts to talk about the story, Kerry is French toast, and the move to replace Kerry with Hillary will be all but complete, with just the coronation speech to cap it off.
Heres my comment in August on the following post. Its worked out so far, and theres no reason to believe the Clintons would stop now:
1) Next week, RNC convention and very Presidential speech net Bush a 10 point lead in some polls.
2) Sep 5-15. Kerry continues to flip-flop, and get caught in more lies about his Vietnam "service."
3) Sep 15-25. Media covers Kerry implosion 24/7. Dems panic, launch "Torricelli Switch" trial balloon.
4) Sep 25-30. Kerry, under pressure from every side, drops out for X reason. (X = health, family, ?whatever dumb thing Kerry thinks of?)
5) Oct 1. Hillary "drafted" by Dems, makes droning "Ya know" speech. Liberal media go nuts, 24/7 Hillary love fest begins.
6) Month of Oct. Hillary gets clobbered by Bush in debates - liberal media still oozes Clinton DNA over her "Strong performances."
7) Nov 2. Hillary wins by narrow margin as liberal precincts around the country report record turnout - 150-200% in some cases.
Don't laugh, she's running THIS year. Everything is perfectly aligned, just as the Clintons have planned it since January 2001.
Be afraid, be VERY afraid.
9 posted on 08/26/2004 10:27:43 AM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies |Report Abuse ]
OK, things are going precisely as they have planned it, so what can us Freepers do to wreck this train before it even leaves the station?
Get the word out. Tell your friends, relatives, and especially, any news types you know. We need the story that Hillary is waiting to replace Kerry to be out there BEFORE it happens. That eliminates the media excitement factor to a degree.
Keep our eyes open for signs. Signs of a candidate in such deep trouble, hes starting to inflate the life raft.
Signs like:
Campaign stop or fundraiser cancellations. Post these ASAP and imply that Kerry is dropping out and will be replaced by Hillary any moment now.
Associates distancing themselves from Kerry. Like Edwards has already done! Michael Moore made some comments on how Kerry is a loser, but theyre stuck with him, so they need to make the best of it. Comments like that are just one short step away from abandonment.
Dont be complacent that Hillary cant win. Shell get virtually every vote that Gore got in 2000, plus a few female Bush voters who will vote for her just because shes a woman, and dont forget that vote fraud, theres no way theyll mess up again like they did in Florida by spiking the Buchanan hole instead of the Gore one.
I don't understand why she would gain from that. When she can sit back for four years, and have a fresh run at that time.
It is the mirror image of the kind of paranoia rampant at DU.
She will run if she thinks there is ANY chance she can win, because it's a no-lose proposition for her.
Win - Queen for life.
Lose - Pre-anointed for 2008.
You are right. After all she was crowned smartest woman in the world by her fellow demonrat fans.
Pray for W and Our Troops
She has no real experience to be President, no real background training, but....this is her window. She can jump into the Presidential nominee for the Dem party spot for the last month of the campaign, and has an outside chance of winning. Even if she loses, she can have the 2008 nom just by waving her hand.
Who wouldn't take that chance?
You are in so much fear of this woman you have become irrational.
But go ahead, pretend you're not afraid of her.
Yes, it is indeed.
No way. She is not that smart to pull it off, and I don't think she plans on moving in on this late date. I do keep hearing about it occasionally during Rush's show, however. I think the chance might be wafer thin.
We are already past the cutoff date for all 50 states. She woouldn't get on the ballots of many states, much less enough. No, Kerry's their only possible horse.
There's no fear here. But when I posted earlier to not be an "Ostrich," I was really talking to you.
She may not be running this year. She may be. But forethought and concern are the insurance policies on disaster.
"How convenient that Kerry emphasizes his brief Vietnam history, as flawed as it is, to focus his attacks on President Bushs Guard service. And yet, he flip-flopped "
It's what they(carpetbaggers) know best, flip flop till they drop. Frankly if this were true even sHillary would be handing Bush his second term. The American public would rise up and CRUSH her. You can fool us once, shame on them, fool us twice shame on us. A third time they will make her turn on a dime onto the next rail out of every town USA.
In order to be Queen she has to be female.
But no matter what she ain't going to throw herself in front of a juggernaut and Kerry ain't going nowhere. She won't even get the nomination in 2008 either. Hillary is not a threat and will only see her influence diminish no matter what she does.
It is beyond me why people have any concern about her. She is unelectable outside the most liberal states.
They would trot out Gore for a rematch with the slogan "Re-defeat Bush in 2004"
I would hope that with the new power of the New Media, we could run Ms. Arrogant out of D.C. on a rusty rail if she tries to run.
But never count out the power of the still-liberal MS media, electronic vote machine fraud, and 6,000 Dem lawyers to fight/demand recounts.
You forgot to say;
YOU KNOW!
How do they impeach if they don't have the House or the Senate?
GORE? You're NOT serious, are you???
I doubt she would win with a right in candidacy.
Do you mean a "write in" candidacy, or a "right wing" candidacy? :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.