Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HILLARY'S COUP D'ETAT! (Hillary to Replace Kerry)
HenchPAC Exclusive ^ | 09/21/04 | Henchster

Posted on 09/21/2004 4:47:21 PM PDT by Henchster

Shortly after the 2002 election, after watching the cadaver Lautenberg easily win after Torricelli had been way behind, I realized that assault on democracy, which we’ll call the “Torch Lighting,” was simply a dry run for the real thing in 2004.

Everyone knows Hillary wants to be Queen, and not just of New York. Yet even Hillary the Vain knows she can’t survive a year-long campaign, either her mouth or her past would catch up to her, and that would be the end of that. No, she needs a dramatically shortened campaign season to be successful.

How amazing that first Howard Dean and the other Dem hopefuls go down in flames, and Kerry, whose own campaign was on verge of collapse in December, rises up to be the nominee.

How convenient that Kerry emphasizes his brief Vietnam history, as flawed as it is, to focus his attacks on President Bush’s Guard service. And yet, he flip-flopped from being for the war when he seeking the nomination, to being against it, and attacking the President on his Iraq War policy.

How ironic that Kerry’s own service record falls apart under scrutiny, and his own campaign gets caught in a forged military records scandal.

These are NOT coincidences. Behind the scenes, for the last four years, the Clintons have been charting the course, picking the players, setting the policy, and tracking the results. When Dean looked poised to run away with the nomination, the Clintons whispered into the ears of fatcats in smokey back rooms that maybe they should get on the Kerry wagon, and Dean was gone faster than you could say “YEEEAAAARRRGGGHH!” Remember though, it wasn’t the Dean-Scream that caused his plunge, the scream was the result – of the Clinton influence that worked the least-liked, most wishy-washy, dopey, overly nuanced dork of the whole bunch from worst to first. Even Kucinich had more gravitas.

And now, the Clintons are ready, and in the perfect position, for the biggest power-play of their lives. The “Torch Lighting” of Kerry has started, and it will only be days before you begin to hear the grumblings of the liberal masses that Kerry is a loser, and maybe should be replaced. Once the media even starts to talk about the story, Kerry is French toast, and the move to replace Kerry with Hillary will be all but complete, with just the coronation speech to cap it off.

Here’s my comment in August on the following post. It’s worked out so far, and there’s no reason to believe the Clintons would stop now:

FR Thread

1) Next week, RNC convention and very Presidential speech net Bush a 10 point lead in some polls.

2) Sep 5-15. Kerry continues to flip-flop, and get caught in more lies about his Vietnam "service."

3) Sep 15-25. Media covers Kerry implosion 24/7. Dems panic, launch "Torricelli Switch" trial balloon.

4) Sep 25-30. Kerry, under pressure from every side, drops out for X reason. (X = health, family, ?whatever dumb thing Kerry thinks of?)

5) Oct 1. Hillary "drafted" by Dems, makes droning "Ya know" speech. Liberal media go nuts, 24/7 Hillary love fest begins.

6) Month of Oct. Hillary gets clobbered by Bush in debates - liberal media still oozes Clinton DNA over her "Strong performances."

7) Nov 2. Hillary wins by narrow margin as liberal precincts around the country report record turnout - 150-200% in some cases.

Don't laugh, she's running THIS year. Everything is perfectly aligned, just as the Clintons have planned it since January 2001.

Be afraid, be VERY afraid.

9 posted on 08/26/2004 10:27:43 AM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies |Report Abuse ]

OK, things are going precisely as they have planned it, so what can us Freepers do to wreck this train before it even leaves the station?

Get the word out. Tell your friends, relatives, and especially, any news types you know. We need the story that Hillary is waiting to replace Kerry to be out there BEFORE it happens. That eliminates the media excitement factor to a degree.

Keep our eyes open for signs. Signs of a candidate in such deep trouble, he’s starting to inflate the life raft.

Signs like:

Campaign stop or fundraiser cancellations. Post these ASAP and imply that Kerry is dropping out and will be replaced by Hillary any moment now.

Associates distancing themselves from Kerry. Like Edwards has already done! Michael Moore made some comments on how Kerry is a loser, but they’re stuck with him, so they need to make the best of it. Comments like that are just one short step away from abandonment.

Don’t be complacent that Hillary can’t win. She’ll get virtually every vote that Gore got in 2000, plus a few female Bush voters who will vote for her just because she’s a woman, and don’t forget that vote fraud, there’s no way they’ll mess up again like they did in Florida by spiking the Buchanan hole instead of the Gore one.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: clinton; elections; hillary; kerry; l00pythe0ry; scaretactics; tinfoil; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-288 next last
To: Brilliant

I don't understand why she would gain from that. When she can sit back for four years, and have a fresh run at that time.


161 posted on 09/21/2004 8:09:27 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

It is the mirror image of the kind of paranoia rampant at DU.


162 posted on 09/21/2004 8:10:04 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (My father is 10X the hero John Fraud Kerry is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
She's not as smart as you give her credit for, she's just arrogant and impatient that she hasn't been crowned Queen.

She will run if she thinks there is ANY chance she can win, because it's a no-lose proposition for her.

Win - Queen for life.

Lose - Pre-anointed for 2008.

163 posted on 09/21/2004 8:10:41 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

You are right. After all she was crowned smartest woman in the world by her fellow demonrat fans.


164 posted on 09/21/2004 8:11:43 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
It doesn't matter! The people who have decided on W have decided deep. There is no wishy washy left on his people. She would get clobbered as bad or worse than Yaaaawn.

Pray for W and Our Troops

165 posted on 09/21/2004 8:14:58 PM PDT by bray (Nam Vets Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
She's nowhere NEAR as "Slick" as Bill. She's a lousy speaker, can't think on her feet, and can't do the lip biting thing.

She has no real experience to be President, no real background training, but....this is her window. She can jump into the Presidential nominee for the Dem party spot for the last month of the campaign, and has an outside chance of winning. Even if she loses, she can have the 2008 nom just by waving her hand.

Who wouldn't take that chance?

166 posted on 09/21/2004 8:18:32 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

You are in so much fear of this woman you have become irrational.

But go ahead, pretend you're not afraid of her.


167 posted on 09/21/2004 8:19:47 PM PDT by stands2reason (Limousine Liberal--a man who has his cake, eats his cake, and complains that other people have cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Yes, it is indeed.


168 posted on 09/21/2004 8:20:55 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

No way. She is not that smart to pull it off, and I don't think she plans on moving in on this late date. I do keep hearing about it occasionally during Rush's show, however. I think the chance might be wafer thin.


169 posted on 09/21/2004 8:22:26 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
Do you understand that you're talking about 50 separate elections? With 50 separate elections boards? As others have already pointed out, it ain't gonna happen in enough states to give her enough electoral votes to even get close to winning.

We are already past the cutoff date for all 50 states. She woouldn't get on the ballots of many states, much less enough. No, Kerry's their only possible horse.

170 posted on 09/21/2004 8:24:35 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
You're the one that keeps posting to the thread.

There's no fear here. But when I posted earlier to not be an "Ostrich," I was really talking to you.

She may not be running this year. She may be. But forethought and concern are the insurance policies on disaster.

171 posted on 09/21/2004 8:25:26 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

"How convenient that Kerry emphasizes his brief Vietnam history, as flawed as it is, to focus his attacks on President Bush’s Guard service. And yet, he flip-flopped "

It's what they(carpetbaggers) know best, flip flop till they drop. Frankly if this were true even sHillary would be handing Bush his second term. The American public would rise up and CRUSH her. You can fool us once, shame on them, fool us twice shame on us. A third time they will make her turn on a dime onto the next rail out of every town USA.


172 posted on 09/21/2004 8:29:19 PM PDT by SunnySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

In order to be Queen she has to be female.

But no matter what she ain't going to throw herself in front of a juggernaut and Kerry ain't going nowhere. She won't even get the nomination in 2008 either. Hillary is not a threat and will only see her influence diminish no matter what she does.

It is beyond me why people have any concern about her. She is unelectable outside the most liberal states.


173 posted on 09/21/2004 8:30:18 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (My father is 10X the hero John Fraud Kerry is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"Kerry isn't interested in dropping out. He's lived his entire life for this moment." Agreed, Kerry is too busy being enamored with his dude self.
174 posted on 09/21/2004 8:33:41 PM PDT by SunnySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; All
This thread is crazier than an outhouse fly. No way Hillary would replace the TOMATO CANdidate, but just look at Gore's recent activity. He'll get all the votes he got last time, which I hear was 500,000 more than president Bush, plus all the new found disenfranchised.

They would trot out Gore for a rematch with the slogan "Re-defeat Bush in 2004"

175 posted on 09/21/2004 8:35:40 PM PDT by paleocon patriarch (President Bush is a fighter - John Kerry is a TOMATO CANdidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide
"You can fool us once, shame on them, fool us twice shame on us. A third time they will make her turn on a dime onto the next rail out of every town USA."

I would hope that with the new power of the New Media, we could run Ms. Arrogant out of D.C. on a rusty rail if she tries to run.

But never count out the power of the still-liberal MS media, electronic vote machine fraud, and 6,000 Dem lawyers to fight/demand recounts.

176 posted on 09/21/2004 8:35:56 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Lori675

You forgot to say;

YOU KNOW!


177 posted on 09/21/2004 8:36:02 PM PDT by ladyinred ("John Kerry reporting for spitball and typewriter duty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lucky2

How do they impeach if they don't have the House or the Senate?


178 posted on 09/21/2004 8:36:06 PM PDT by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: paleocon patriarch

GORE? You're NOT serious, are you???


179 posted on 09/21/2004 8:37:28 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

I doubt she would win with a right in candidacy.

Do you mean a "write in" candidacy, or a "right wing" candidacy? :-)


180 posted on 09/21/2004 8:38:24 PM PDT by Macklew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-288 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson