Skip to comments.
BREAKING FROM HANNITY: CBS Producer in Dallas source of Documents
Hannity.com
| 09/10/2004
| Hannity
Posted on 09/10/2004 12:47:25 PM PDT by WoodstockCat
Hannity just said a story will be filed later today that from sources inside CBS that the source of the documents is also the one who provided the Abu Grihab prison photos.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; badoom; cbs; killian; liarsanddamnliars; media; mediabias; mediashillsforkerry; napalminthemorning; rather; rathergate; selectricgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 701-719 next last
To: flying Elvis
Hell they would have been used in 1994
281
posted on
09/10/2004 1:37:14 PM PDT
by
aft_lizard
(I actually voted for John Kerry before I voted against him)
To: MineralMan
Exactly. Which is why wasting time on things that can be disproven is just that...a waste of time. All you need is the overlay of the Word document and the memo. While individual aspects could be reproduced, the documents would still be different. Heck, two docs from to different typewriters wouldn't overlay. Maybe we need a thread on debunking all the forgery theories here. The ones that stand up to intense scrutiny should fall out and be the ones that we use. Frankly some of the threads have gotten ridiculous.
282
posted on
09/10/2004 1:37:31 PM PDT
by
Paradox
(Occam was probably right.)
To: Chunga
His wife said her husband rarely typed, made little hand written notes to himself..and this is a perfect document?..His head of personnel says it looks like a forgery.
283
posted on
09/10/2004 1:37:32 PM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry has been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
To: GailA
How much do you want to bet that CBS doesn't have the originals?
284
posted on
09/10/2004 1:37:32 PM PDT
by
ShandaLear
(Rather lied, CBS News died.)
To: epluribus_2
LOL!! This is getting better and better!!
285
posted on
09/10/2004 1:37:50 PM PDT
by
Renfield
(Philosophy chair at the University of Wallamalloo!!)
To: MEG33
286
posted on
09/10/2004 1:38:13 PM PDT
by
JustPiper
(Zell " We are LIBERATOR'S NOT Obstructionists!!!" Miller- OCCUPY THIS KERRY !!!)
To: formercalifornian
Good one:
You mean Karl Rove sent the Abu Ghraib prison photos?????
287
posted on
09/10/2004 1:38:30 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: jennyjenny
Jenny, it's genetic.
Mine puts soft drink and cereal cartons next to the trash......"because they take up too much room".
Which goes to show that a male non-typist would not bother to center a heading, but would type it in a block justified left on the upper left-hand side.
To: Chunga
Is it absolutely impossible that a retired commander might apply pressure to Killian on behalf of a third party? Nothing's impossible. Not being a military man myself, I'm not sure what kind of "pressure" a guy who's no longer in the chain of command could apply.
289
posted on
09/10/2004 1:39:16 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
("Can someone tell me where to find an ordained archpriest?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
To: narby
I heard it also mentioned by one of the professionals that the curly end of the comma was significant, but I don't think it is. The problem with the documents doesn't, fortunately, just hinge on one or two factors.
290
posted on
09/10/2004 1:39:24 PM PDT
by
MistyCA
To: Fawnn
In addition to all the points that point to the documents themselves being forgeries, isn't this relevant? ......But wait! Reader Amar Sarwal points out that General Staudt, who thought very highly of Lt. Bush, retired in 1972.
That is a very revlevant point. I'm just glad that this did not break on Friday afternoon, so it would be "old news" after the weekend.
I have one thing to say about this entire ordeal:
FReeper Buckhead ZOTTED the Dan Rather Memogate
291
posted on
09/10/2004 1:39:55 PM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Charter member of the VRWC - and proud of it.)
To: searchandrecovery
"Not on the IBM Executive. Remember, it has spaces that divide each space into three.
Cool - good explanation. I bet you never thought that nugget of knowledge would ever be useful (since then). Nice work."
The memos are still fake. I'm just really tired of people who have no clue saying what could and could not be done on the office machines of the day.
I've been writing this stuff for two days, and still people are saying stupid things about 1970s tech. There are folks here on FR who were there, who used this stuff on a professional basis, and can answer questions. There's no excuse for repeating and repeating the same misinformation.
It only serves to dilute the real message.
These memos are forged. All that's needed is the lovely overlay of a document made in Word that fits perfectly over the memo. Nothing fit perfectly in the 70's. I could take two IBM Executives and do a great job of duplicating the memo. You'd look at it and say, "Wow! I guess I was wrong." It would look so much like the memos in this fraud that you wouldn't be able to tell the difference. It would take me hours to do it, but I could.
But then, if you overlaid the two memos from the two typewriters, there would be all sorts of minor misalignments, even though they looked identical at first glance.
With modern laser printers that just doesn't happen. Everything's perfect, within .001" or less. That's why a printout from Word perfectly overlays the memo. Both were done in Word on a laser printer.
That's all the proof that's necessary.
292
posted on
09/10/2004 1:40:02 PM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: mabelkitty
21 - Bush's grade would "normally" be abbreviated "1Lt" not "1st Lt"
====
You need to remove this one, it was shown by someone on a thread that this wasn't the case in the NG in the 70's.
And Bush's own request for discharge shows him signing as 1st Lt. http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc27.gif
293
posted on
09/10/2004 1:40:03 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
(Dan Rather... All the News that's Fit to Forge)
To: JustPiper
You have to remember Texas Democrats are the ones who ran off to Oklahoma and New Mexico instead of doing their job.
Texas Dems are evil!
294
posted on
09/10/2004 1:40:13 PM PDT
by
JFC
To: flying Elvis
If these documents had existed during the 2000 election cycle, they would have been used in 2000 excellent point.
295
posted on
09/10/2004 1:40:17 PM PDT
by
WoodstockCat
(DNC and John Kerry: Forgers R' Us)
To: MEG33
I understand that. I was replying to a different and specific issue, namely that the commander's status as a retiree precluded him from applying pressure to Killian.
296
posted on
09/10/2004 1:40:48 PM PDT
by
Chunga
To: Mike Fieschko
What was the name of the target of the 'two-minute hate' in Orwell's '1984'? Emmanuel Goldstein. I stand by my original reply. Although the books spells it your way, forensic phoneticists have determined that it is indeed possible for the sound produced by the 'E' in the book could easily have been produced by vocal chords using the letter 'I' as far back as 1968.
And by the way, if he had nothing to hide, why didn't George Orwell publish under his real name? Huh?
297
posted on
09/10/2004 1:40:57 PM PDT
by
FredZarguna
(I'm FredZarguna, Founder and President of Fathers United to Counter Kerry.)
To: ShandaLear
How much do you want to bet that CBS doesn't have the originals?
Good point.
But, if DNC-BS had experts look at copies, or copies which had been faxed, then the experts' opinion as to their authenticity would be much less certain than if the expert(s) looked at originals.
298
posted on
09/10/2004 1:41:05 PM PDT
by
Mike Fieschko
(Oh, and Dick Cheney too.)
To: JustPiper
Karl Rove is from Texas. McAuliffe was right, it's his fault!
299
posted on
09/10/2004 1:41:14 PM PDT
by
arichtaxpayer
(We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.)
To: mabelkitty
three different docs have the same small set of dots 1 to 3 inches below the signature area..
flight physical (medical) was ordered no later than 5/14 but his birthday was in July is that correct procedure?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 701-719 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson