[Paradox]

Exactly. Which is why wasting time on things that can be disproven is just that...a waste of time. All you need is the overlay of the Word document and the memo. While individual aspects could be reproduced, the documents would still be different. Heck, two docs from to different typewriters wouldn't overlay.

Maybe we need a thread on debunking all the forgery theories here. The ones that stand up to intense scrutiny should fall out and be the ones that we use. Frankly some of the threads have gotten ridiculous.

[MineralMan]

"Maybe we need a thread on debunking all the forgery theories here. The ones that stand up to intense scrutiny should fall out and be the ones that we use. Frankly some of the threads have gotten ridiculous."

Sorry. I don't have a month. FR is great, but some threads are just insane. It would be nice, but it would deteriorate into nonsense. Just above here is a message saying that they should carbon-date the paper on the original, as though there isn't lots of paper from 1972 sitting around. I could get some in five minutes from my notes from that year. Silliness.