Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

No mention that they might be forgeries. Looks like Edwards is trying to run a campaign based on forged documents.
1 posted on 09/10/2004 10:51:26 AM PDT by vmivol00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: vmivol00

Fastinating..... and Bush just said he'd like EDWARDS to explain the memos.....


2 posted on 09/10/2004 10:52:40 AM PDT by Hi Heels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

Edwards -- a day late and a dollar short.


4 posted on 09/10/2004 10:54:57 AM PDT by Peach (The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

Maybe Edwards needs to call on Kerry to explain his anti-war activities and explain how meeting with the enemy is treason.


5 posted on 09/10/2004 10:55:14 AM PDT by truthseeker2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

Oh, he ought to address them all right- he ought to address them to "P.O. Box 34567" - which is what the memo header indicated as a military unit address.

And the Breck Girl ought to address why he didn't vounteer to do any military seevice in his entire life, even Guard duty. Kerry may want us to think Edwards was in kindergarten during the Vietnam War, but being born in 1953 made Johnny 18 years old during the Kerry testimony to Congress, and old enough to volunteer for 'Nam. Like a lot of other 18-19 year olds did.


7 posted on 09/10/2004 10:56:14 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

He should address them. By referring all questions to Dan Rather.


9 posted on 09/10/2004 10:56:17 AM PDT by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

I think we should take Edward's charges seriously. I mean, how likely is it that an ambulance-chasing trial lawyer would bend the truth?


10 posted on 09/10/2004 10:57:01 AM PDT by NewMediaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

Screw the memos, I want to know how Bush proposes to protect us from the Loch Ness monster.


11 posted on 09/10/2004 10:57:40 AM PDT by laredo44 (Liberty is not the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

You first, Junior: What did you know about the forgeries and when did you know it?


12 posted on 09/10/2004 10:57:42 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00
Drink that DemoncRAT Kool-Aid, John!

Drink it good!


13 posted on 09/10/2004 10:57:49 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00
Looks like Edwards is trying to run a campaign based on forged documents.

Forged documents. Forged history. Makes no difference to Democrats ... The "F" stands for forgery.

14 posted on 09/10/2004 10:58:02 AM PDT by spodefly (I've posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

Ignore Edwards. He will find out about the forged memos soon enough.


15 posted on 09/10/2004 10:58:04 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

I want Edwards to address the memos. Specifically, who's idea was it to forge documents and who knew what when.


16 posted on 09/10/2004 10:58:47 AM PDT by SirAllen (Liberalism*2 = Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

Edwards needs to address the bogus nature of the address on the memoes...


17 posted on 09/10/2004 10:59:40 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever ("The message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00
I wonder if Edwards even took an Evidence class in law school?

Apparantly not!

19 posted on 09/10/2004 11:00:15 AM PDT by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00
I'd love a Ross Perot moment, with charts and pointer-sticks:

"See this? That's a supercript. Pretty common today, but this is a memo from 1973. Ever see a typewriter with one of them? Neither have I. And look at this signature. Let's blow it up. Now, look over here aa a copy of Killian's real signature. A blind hog could tell the difference!

Now, I ask you, where would forgeries like this come from? Maybe an activist Democrat. Maybe based in Texas. An activist like that, why, she might forge these documents and give 'em to her Daddy the big-time newsman. I'm not making any claim, you know. I'm just supposin'"

20 posted on 09/10/2004 11:00:19 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I have two words for John Kerry: "YYYEEEEAAARRGGGHHHH!!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

pssst psst....John....here's the updated talking points.
Sorry we were a little tardy in getting to them.

Oh........here's a towel. You have what looks like egg all over your face and crow feathers on your lips.


23 posted on 09/10/2004 11:00:36 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00
Looks like Edwards is trying to run a campaign based on forged documents.

Also looks a little suspicious that the Kerry campaign had a whole strategy built around the airing of that 60 minutes story, eh?

25 posted on 09/10/2004 11:00:51 AM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

BWWWAAAHHHH HHHAAAA HAAAAA!

Sorry, that was just soooo funny.


26 posted on 09/10/2004 11:01:20 AM PDT by Calpernia ("People never like what they don't understand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

Seems like a successful lawyer like Edwards should know that it is up to the accuser to prove their case, not the other way around.


28 posted on 09/10/2004 11:02:27 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vmivol00

Dan Rather should have to explain the memos, and the source.


29 posted on 09/10/2004 11:02:42 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson