Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Questions On Bush Guard Duty [CBS USES FORGERIES TO SMEAR THE PRESIDENT!!!!!]
CBS ^ | 9/10/04 | Staff

Posted on 09/09/2004 7:33:57 AM PDT by TastyManatees

New Questions On Bush Guard Duty

CBS) The military records of the two men running for president have become part of the political arsenal in this campaign – a tool for building up, or blowing up, each candidate’s credibility as America's next commander-in-chief.

While Sen. Kerry has been targeted for what he did in Vietnam, President Bush has been criticized for avoiding Vietnam by landing a spot in the Texas Air National Guard - and then failing to meet some of his obligations.

Did then-Lt. Bush fulfill all of his military obligations? And just how did he land that spot in the National Guard in the first place? Correspondent Dan Rather has new information on the president’s military service – and the first-ever interview with the man who says he pulled strings to get young George W. Bush into the Texas Air National Guard.

...

But 60 Minutes has obtained a number of documents we are told were taken from Col. Killian's personal file. Among them, a never-before-seen memorandum from May 1972, where Killian writes that Lt. Bush called him to talk about "how he can get out of coming to drill from now through November."

Lt. Bush tells his commander "he is working on a campaign in Alabama…. and may not have time to take his physical." Killian adds that he thinks Lt. Bush has gone over his head, and is "talking to someone upstairs."

Col. Killian died in 1984. 60 Minutes consulted a handwriting analyst and document expert who believes the material is authentic.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; 60minutes; bush; camejo; cbs; ccrm; cheney; dubya; edwards; election; forgery; fraud; gwb; kerry; killian; nader; napalminthemorning; nationalguard; pilot; seebsnews; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 941-945 next last
CBS is apparently using forged documents to smear President Bush, and they aren’t even forged all that well. The 1972-73 memos Dan Rather cites to were not written in the period from 1972-1973. How can you tell? The font they are typed in did not exist back then!

A commenter from the Powerline blog explains:
Every single one of the memos to file regarding Bush's failure to attend a physical and meet other requirements is in a proportionally spaced font, probably Palatino or Times New Roman. In 1972 people used typewriters for this sort of thing (especially in the military), and typewriters used mono-spaced fonts.

The use of proportionally spaced fonts did not come into common use for office memos until the introduction high-end word processing systems from Xerox and Wang, and later of laser printers, word processing software, and personal computers. They were not widespread until the mid to late 90's.

Before then, you needed typesetting equipment, and that wasn't used for personal memos to file. Even the Wang and other systems that were dominant in the mid 80's used mono-spaced fonts. I doubt the TANG had typesetting or high-end 1st generation word processing systems.

I am saying these documents are forgeries, run through a copier for 15 generations to make them look old. This should be pursued aggressively.
Do the experiment for yourself! Look at the memos that CBS cites to:
Memo 1- 1972
Memo 2- 1972
Memo 3- 1972
Memo 4-1973

Now, open Microsoft Word and start a new document. Select the "MS Mincho" 12 pt font (MS=monospace), and type "I’ll backdate, but won’t rate. Harris agrees." Now type the same phrase directly below it in "Times New Roman" 12 pt. font. Compare these two to the memo dated May 4, 1972 that CBS is using as support for its allegations. It's obvious to even a non-expert that the memos were typed in proportionately spaced font that did not exist at the time they are alleged to have been written.

CBS is using blatant forgeries to smear the President, and they are quite confident that you will do nothing about it.
1 posted on 09/09/2004 7:33:58 AM PDT by TastyManatees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees

BTTT and Ping THE WORLD!!!


2 posted on 09/09/2004 7:36:10 AM PDT by mingusthecat (Mingus has again opined. Like any cat, she doesn't really care what YOU think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
Already posted Are the Killian Memos Fakes?
3 posted on 09/09/2004 7:36:32 AM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees

A show of hands for anybody thinking that a National Guard military post would have access to a 70's "modern", high-end word processing system?? Anybody?... anybody?


4 posted on 09/09/2004 7:36:36 AM PDT by alancarp (Boycott France and anything that even LOOKS French.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
Ah, yes, the "deadman's memo" gambit.

Then why have they ignored the memos I have from other dead people which prove, variously, that John Kerry is really Fidel Castro's younger brother, or that Kerry is actually a Pod Person here to lead the invasion of Earth. Well??

5 posted on 09/09/2004 7:37:12 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees

I asked a co-worker about this from another thread I can't fins now. This is what I copied from the other thread:
______________________________________________________

The Globe story is itself based on last night's 60 Minutes report: "New questions on Bush Guard duty." The online version of the 60 Minutes story has links to the memos. Killian died in 1984; CBS states that it "consulted a handwriting analyst and document expert who believes the material is authentic." Reader Tom Mortensen writes:

Every single one of the memos to file regarding Bush's failure to attend a physical and meet other requirements is in a proportionally spaced font, probably Palatino or Times New Roman. In 1972 people used typewriters for this sort of thing (especially in the military), and typewriters used mono-spaced fonts.

The use of proportionally spaced fonts did not come into common use for office memos until the introduction high-end word processing systems from Xerox and Wang, and later of laser printers, word processing software, and personal computers. They were not widespread until the mid to late 90's.

Before then, you needed typesetting equipment, and that wasn't used for personal memos to file. Even the Wang and other systems that were dominant in the mid 80's used mono-spaced fonts. I doubt the TANG had typesetting or high-end 1st generation word processing systems.

I am saying these documents are forgeries, run through a copier for 15 generations to make them look old. This should be pursued aggressively.

__________________________________________________

Below is what my co-worker had to say (he's been a computer programmer for years and years and years (in his 60's now) and is one of the smartest people I've ever met:

____________________________________________________

If the photos of those documents are in a proportional font, they are certainly forgeries. Only professional printing had proprotional fonts at that time. It was well into the 80s before proportional fonts came into use and even then few people had them.
__________________________________________________________


6 posted on 09/09/2004 7:37:46 AM PDT by eyespysomething ("...you're not fit to be a prison guard at Abu Ghraib, much less commander in chief.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mingusthecat

Right off the bat, the use of a superscript in the first memo for "111th" raises a red flag.


7 posted on 09/09/2004 7:38:28 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
CBS states that it "consulted a handwriting analyst and document expert who believes the material is authentic."

~~~~~~~~~~~~

I wonder why CBS would feel the need to do so?

8 posted on 09/09/2004 7:39:45 AM PDT by The G Man (I'm mad as ZELL and I'm not gonna take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees

Nice work. Your blog?

If accurate, this is very damning for those who produced the memos. I would consider it criminal fraud.

Do you think the main stream media would bother to report this, even though they are willing to report the reckless speculation that they do?

They are more than happy to spin the tone of the memos, but are no longer willing to pursue the Sandy Berger PantsGate story.

What the hell is wrong with the media in this country? It is very frightening how little they care about truth these days.


9 posted on 09/09/2004 7:39:45 AM PDT by bluefish (Holding out for worthy tagline...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bump


10 posted on 09/09/2004 7:40:09 AM PDT by mingusthecat (Mingus has again opined. Like any cat, she doesn't really care what YOU think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

The Texas state guard would have been the last place to have modern equipment. I've seen guard units back in the 1980s...which as a active duty-type...it shocked me how badly they were equipped. If they had a typewriter...then they had one and only one...and it would have the squadron orderly room typing anything. And the amount of mistakes would have been easily seen...nothing was ever precisely typed. If this document doesn't have corrections noted on it...I'd be asking questions.


11 posted on 09/09/2004 7:40:47 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; sonsofliberty2000; Grampa Dave; MeekOneGOP; RottiBiz; CitizenUSA; Mia T; Chieftain; ...

Ping for CBS fraud on behalf of Kerry.


12 posted on 09/09/2004 7:41:12 AM PDT by TastyManatees (http://www.tastymanatees.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jriemer

Glad it was posted again, or I would have missed it. This should be posted every 10 minutes in my opinion. The blatant criminal fraud perpetrated by the Rats and their media helpers is completely out of control.


13 posted on 09/09/2004 7:41:22 AM PDT by bluefish (Holding out for worthy tagline...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

I think we should bring this to the attention of Rush. Does anyone have a link to him? Also to Drudge.

nick


14 posted on 09/09/2004 7:41:40 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees

We really need to email bomb folks like Drudge and Fox on this. That will be the fastest way to get it out.


15 posted on 09/09/2004 7:41:57 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
I think we should bring this to the attention of Rush

I know Rush reads FR. Here's hoping he mentions it on his show. That could get it to Fox. From there, it might make some of the talking head shows on the cable nets.

16 posted on 09/09/2004 7:42:59 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pete

bttt


17 posted on 09/09/2004 7:43:06 AM PDT by petercooper (All I wanted to know about Islam, I learned on 9-11-01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Bingo. Time to change my tag line back to what it was a couple months ago.


18 posted on 09/09/2004 7:45:02 AM PDT by alancarp (When does it cease to be "Freedom of the Press" and become outright SEDITION?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pete
01 August 1972

No. 2 ________ and convening of a flight review board IAW AFM 35-13.

What is IAW etc and where is the followup?

19 posted on 09/09/2004 7:45:06 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TastyManatees
Very few people under the age of 50 these days have ever even seen a document that was actually typed in a mono-spaced font. And those of us at or over that age haven't seen one for years. I'm certainly willing to believe that this is a "forest/trees" scenario where it just didn't register!

Having said that, this is very damning. CBS is going to have to take a new look at these memos. I'd like to hear what their document expert has to say about this.

20 posted on 09/09/2004 7:46:12 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 941-945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson