Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mingusthecat

Right off the bat, the use of a superscript in the first memo for "111th" raises a red flag.


7 posted on 09/09/2004 7:38:28 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


bump


10 posted on 09/09/2004 7:40:09 AM PDT by mingusthecat (Mingus has again opined. Like any cat, she doesn't really care what YOU think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
01 August 1972

No. 2 ________ and convening of a flight review board IAW AFM 35-13.

What is IAW etc and where is the followup?

19 posted on 09/09/2004 7:45:06 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

I know some word processors can do superscript. I imagine some typewriters can do it as well. Doubt the army would shell out money for a frivilous tool like that. Especially since I still see people today in the military typing out memos on machines that can do it but don't use the function.


105 posted on 09/09/2004 8:27:38 AM PDT by Bogey78O (John Kerry: Better than Ted Kennedy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

The 18 August Memo .. has a superscripted 'th' in 187th.

Try this in MS Word or other common WP .. type 187 .. space .. th .. then try it without the space.
Notice the continual use of spacing between numbers and 'th' in the memos.. not necessary on a typewriter as it won't auto superscript (it can't).


But I will admit I am confused on one point:
MSNBC says that copies of these same memos were provided by the WH? So what gives?


157 posted on 09/09/2004 9:09:27 AM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
Good golly, you are absolutely correct. We are supposed to believe that the NG bought typewriters with multiple fonts and superscripting features built in way back in 1972?


249 posted on 09/09/2004 9:47:15 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Pete
Right off the bat, the use of a superscript in the first memo for "111th" raises a red flag.

That's the key even more so than the type set as the letter imprints that strike the ribbon on any common typewriter are the same size whether you superscript or not.

MS Word, on the other hand, has an automatic default setting that superscripts and shrinks the little th's at the end of any numerical note. The forger probably typed 111th and it automatically superscripted without him even realizing it.

376 posted on 09/09/2004 10:32:16 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist ("Can Lincoln expect to subjugate a people thus resolved? No!" - Sam Houston, 3/1863)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

Why?

http://www.fact-index.com/i/ib/ibm_selectric_typewriter.html


664 posted on 09/09/2004 1:02:28 PM PDT by DennisR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

"Right off the bat, the use of a superscript in the first memo for "111th" raises a red flag."

I was a personnelman (typewriter commando) when I first enlisted in 1974, and used or at least saw every kind of typewriter in the military supply system back then.

A superscript was done by rotating the platen a half turn, then rotating it back to continue, but there was no way to make the chars smaller like MS Word does now automatically.

Except, perhaps, by using an IBM Selectric II, changing the type ball to a smaller font, then changing it back.

However, that wasn't done for the "th" up in the letterhead of the same memo.

As far as I'm concerned, the superscript is a dead giveaway. The fact that it only appears in that one place says to me that MS Word changed it automatically, and the forger didn't notice.


752 posted on 09/09/2004 3:11:28 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Pete

Another indication is in paragraph 3 of memo 3.

Back then, typists were taught to break and hyphenate words at the end of a line to preserve a more uniform right margin. Taking a whole word down to the next line and leaving a large indentation on the right didn't become common until word processors.

A military clerk would have broken the word, "forwarded."

...forwar-
ded...


753 posted on 09/09/2004 3:15:23 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson