America no longer white, united, English-speaking

The Miami Herald ^ | 02 April 2004 | Patrick J. Buchanan

[MegaSilver]

In 1960, when JFK defeated Nixon, America was a nation of 160 million, 90 percent white and 10 percent black, with a few million Hispanics and Asians sprinkled among us.

We were one nation, one people. We worshipped the same God, spoke the same English language, studied American history and English literature, honored the same heroes, read the same books, watched the same TV shows, went to the same movies and saw ourselves as defenders of Western civilization against the godless communism of the Soviet Empire.

We were confident and proud of who we were. That was yesterday. But due to the Immigration Act of 1965 and the cultural revolution of the '60s, that America is now gone forever. And as one studies the latest projections of the Census Bureau, the America of our grandchildren will be another country altogether, a nation unrecognizable to our parents, a giant Brazil of the North.

In 2050, there will be three times as many people living here as in 1960 -- 420 million. White Americans will be a minority, 49 percent, and falling. Hispanics in the United States, more than 100 million, will be equal to the population of today's Mexico. Our Asian population will be almost as large as our African-American population today.

By countries of origin, America will be a Third World nation. Our cities will look like Los Angeles today. Los Angeles and the cities of Texas, Arizona and California will look like Mexico City.

Writing in Foreign Policy, Harvard Professor Samuel Huntington, author of Who We Are, raises an alarm about the huge infusion of Hispanics into the Southwest, and for many reasons.

Much of this mass immigration is illegal. Vast numbers are coming here only to work. They are not assimilating. They do not want to become Americans. They are concentrating in states bordering Mexico, which is their country and a nation with a historic grievance against us. They are holding on to their language and culture, creating a Hispanic nation within our nation. By 2050, there will be scores of millions of people living here whose loyalty is to a foreign country.

Moreover, as multiculturalism has captured our schools and colleges, immigrant children will have prejudices and grievances against America and the West reinforced as they learn. The academic elite that controls these schools already paints America as a nation with a rancid history of genocide, slavery, racism, oppression and imperialism.

Is the Census Bureau future the future that Americans wish? No. Are they willing to risk it for their grandchildren? No.

Why, then, does that future appear inevitable?

Answer: Though a majority of Americans wish to preserve the land they grew up in for their children, our elites -- political, academic, cultural and corporate -- are either unwilling to conserve that America or indifferent to its disappearance.

Most Americans want immigration cut back and all illegal aliens sent back. Why is the will of the majority, expressed in polls and referenda, not reflected in law or policy? Because we no longer live in a democratic republic; we are ruled by a managerial elite.

America's corporate elites want an endless supply of cheap labor. Our judges throw out popularly enacted laws to which they object. Our academic elites work to see ''white, racist America'' disappear. Our neo-Marxist cultural elites wish to be the gravediggers of the West and of Christian culture. And America's conservative party, the Republican Party, believes that Hispanics hold the key to retention of presidential power and is anxious not to offend Mexican President Vicente Fox.

If, by 2050, the America we grew up in has become a Tower of Babel of squabbling minorities that is falling apart, it will be because of the treason of the elites, and our lack of will to overthrow them.

[wardaddy]

In 1998 I drove from Nashville to Minneapolis and back.

I drove thru downtown Chicago and onto I-94 and over towards Gary and then back thru Indianapolis and Louisville to here. The area just south of downtown where the projects towers go on forever looked most uninviting and it remained that way for what seemed like around 20 miles.

I do not know Chicago. My wife loves it. Chicago for her is like NYC is for me.....Center of the Universe sort of.

[wardaddy]

Harder They Come...Mon

[cyborg]

I guess *lol*

[rdb3]

You know what I've always wanted to know? Where did crack come from? I guess that's another thread.

Columbians.

Hey Ya!

[Dan from Michigan]

Where did crack come from? I guess that's another thread.

Columbia?

[Torie]

I believe most of those towers are now gone along the Dan Ryan. (They only went on for about 7 miles, it just seemd like 20.) Just another one of those failed social experiments. I don't know what genius thought it a good idea to stack dysfunctional folks one on top of the other, but it didn't work out. The rival gangs controlling various towers, would have aerial gun fights between them. It must have been fun.

[wardaddy]

I thought Jamaicans in NYC were the first to snap crackle and pop?

[cyborg]

thanks...I went looking around and had to push aside the fringe kook sites and the DARE propaganda to get info. I don't get how drug dealers made so much money if crack was so cheap. During the 1980s it seemed like crack was the modern day equivalent of the Influenza Panic. I know gangsta rap isn't the most entertaining genre of music but almost of all talk about crack.

(okay let me stop...getting a little deep and far off topic)

[wardaddy]

Sounds like Sarajevo....hey...another example of caucazoid dysfunctionality...lol

I think I would advise the .50BMG or .338 Lapua for tower targeting between gangs at the projects.

[Dan from Michigan]

My guess is that is was 'cheap' because it was so easy to be hooked. One of my relatives who was addicted said it only took one hit.

He was over $30,000 in debt when he went into rehab.

[Travis McGee]

No es una pregunta de color de piel o de ojos, es una pregunta de cultura. O falta de cultura...

[DentsRun]

Most of the looters were not Hispanic, and a fair number were Anglos. I saw some looting a store in Hollywood on TV.

You'r right that it was a multi-racial riot. But the majority of looters were Hispanic. Unlike the blacks who were trying to burn down as many buildings as they could, they weren't mad about the Rodney King verdict. They just wanted in on a piece of the action. I read that one group of looters rented a car in Bakersfield and drove all the way to LA to loot.

Here are a couple of citations regarding the racial composition of the looters.

According to a Rand Corporation study blacks were not the majority of the rioters or the looters. Whites were prominently among the looters and the rioters, although the vast majority of the rioters and looters were Hispanic. . .

http://www.gibbsmagazine.com/Studies%20needed.htm

At the time, the rest of the country saw it as a black riot, even though the biggest group of people arrested during the disturbances was Hispanic, most of them immigrants picked up by police and National Guard troops for violating curfew or petty looting.

http://www.inthesetimes.com/issue/24/21/gonzalez2421.html

There was also a justice department official who said early on that as much as 80% of the people arrested during the riots were illegal immigrants. (I think that figure was later revised downward).

[Cronos]

If Pat cut the racial tone out of this article, this would be a perfect article.

Yup, Pat shoots himself in the foot (and the real issues get tainted by the nut)

[Cronos]

White is not a race, Caucasian is a race, Mongoloid (to which native Americans belong) is a race.

[Cronos]

Ronnie: China actually built a huge wall to keep immigrants out...

Ha HA HA! The chinese built walls to keep the nomads from raiding the Chinese towns. THe first Chinese Emperor united these walls. The walls weren't to keep immigrants out, but to keep raiders out.

[Cronos]

Read the entire post.

Wardaddy brought up Columbus and the Spanish Armada. Columbus sailed in 1492. That was BEFORE the date of 1500 when the Chinese and Euro navies got on par.

[Cronos]

"the decendants of brown-skinned immigrants, raised in the US for generations, won't be able to run the country" They still need AA to get into good schools.

Affirmative action isn't there for South/West Asians....

[Cronos]

Any analysis that puts Argentina and Haiti in the same economic category has to be bogus.

No. The Income list differentiates the two. Both Argentina and Haiti are developing nations, not developed. (2002/3 values, but now I'd call Haiti underdeveloped) but Haiti is a low income country while Argentina is a high middle income country

[Cronos]

Vader Rules

[cyborg]

I agree :)