Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Fossil Links Four-legged Land Animals To Ancient Fish
National Science Foundation ^ | 01 April 2004 | Staff

Posted on 04/02/2004 4:25:18 PM PST by PatrickHenry

Arlington, Va.—How land-living animals evolved from fish has long been a scientific puzzle. A key missing piece has been knowledge of how the fins of fish transformed into the arms and legs of our ancestors. In this week's issue of the journal Science, paleontologists Neil Shubin and Michael Coates from the University of Chicago and Ted Daeschler from the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, describe a remarkable fossil that bridges the gap between fish and amphibian and provides a glimpse of the structure and function changes from fin to limb.

The fossil, a 365-million-year-old arm bone, or humerus, shares features with primitive fish fins but also has characteristics of a true limb bone. Discovered near a highway roadside in north-central Penn., the bone is the earliest of its kind from any limbed animal.

"It has long been understood that the first four-legged creatures on land arose from the lobed-finned fishes in the Devonian Period," said Rich Lane, director of the National Science Foundation's (NSF) geology and paleontology program. "Through this work, we've learned that fish developed the ability to prop their bodies through modification of their fins, leading to the emergence of tetrapod limbs."

NSF, the independent federal agency that supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and engineering, funded the research.

The bone's structure reveals an animal that had powerful forelimbs, with extensive areas for the attachment of muscles at the shoulder. "The size and extent of these muscles means that the humerus played a significant role in the support and movement of the animal," reported Shubin. "These muscles would have been important in propping the body up and pushing it off of the ground."

Interestingly, modern-day fish have smaller versions of the muscles. According to Coates, "When this humerus is compared to those of closely-related fish, it becomes clear that the ability to prop the body is more ancient than we previously thought. This means that many of the features we thought evolved to allow for life on land originally evolved in fish living in aquatic ecosystems."

The layered rock along the Clinton County, Penn., roadside were deposited by ancient stream systems that flowed during the Devonian Period, about 365 million years ago. Enclosed in the rocks is fossil evidence of an ecosystem teeming with plant and animal life. "We found a number of interesting fossils at the site," reported Daeschler, who uncovered the fossil in 1993. "But the significance of this specimen went unnoticed for several years because only a small portion of the bone was exposed and most of it lay encased in a brick-sized piece of red sandstone."

Not until three years ago, when Fred Mullison, the fossil preparator at the Academy of Natural Sciences, excavated the bone from the rock, did the importance of the new specimen become evident.

The work was also funded by a grant from the National Geographic Society.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: biology; creationism; crevolist; darwin; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; michaelcoates; neilshubin; paleontology; teddaeschler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-456 last
To: RobRoy
Answer the question. Can police tell whether a bone belongs to a human?
441 posted on 04/06/2004 12:50:22 PM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
Nobody really "knows" what caused this feature in the Arizona landscape. No witnesses. Can't be reproduced in the lab. Therefore it's pure speculation:


442 posted on 04/06/2004 12:54:04 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
What feature? Al I see is a blurry image that could easily be faked in photoshop. Don't peddle your religion to me.

Besides, belief in computer screens is just a religion.
443 posted on 04/06/2004 12:57:44 PM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
By your reasoning, Scott Peterson, OJ Simpson, and Kobe Bryant,cannot be guilty; there were no witnesses. It's the Johnny Cochran method of denying scientific investigation.





444 posted on 04/06/2004 1:20:29 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Clearly someone dug it. You can see the highway which was used to transport the dirt away from there and later used to build Boulder Dam.
445 posted on 04/06/2004 1:23:24 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
No witnesses. Can't be reproduced in the lab. Therefore it's pure speculation:


446 posted on 04/06/2004 4:38:13 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
[ I guess that you don't have any refutation to the information that Ichneumon provided? Why can't you just come out and say "I admit that I have absolutely no facts to back up my assertions"? ]

Had no intention of refuteing it. Mocking it is more like what I doing.. You not noticing that shows you might have missed other things.

447 posted on 04/06/2004 11:05:44 PM PDT by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: js1138
[(ME) Everybody is preaching something more by what they do than by what they say.. ]
[(YOU) The Bill clinton argument: everybody's doing it.]

You have morphed what I said into a really strange brew..
Are you a DEMOCRAT..?

448 posted on 04/06/2004 11:09:11 PM PDT by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
So you are not one of the Evolutionist religious zealots. Not all who study evolution are. Many are real scientists.

No, I am not...but you must admit there are "zealots" on both sides of the argument, yes? Regardless of which camp a person is in, we still have a lot to learn. I don't think the theory of natural selection has it quite right, and certainly the folks who simply say that God waved His hand and all came into being don't have a lock on the facts either. A LOT more went into the creation of this Universe. Anyone who claims to know the "truth" is suspect in my mind.

449 posted on 04/07/2004 6:39:18 AM PDT by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
They say it's the thumbs that really tell the story.

Ah, the measure of a man...and there is some science to back up the contention, statistically speaking. ;^)

450 posted on 04/07/2004 6:43:23 AM PDT by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Thanks! And good luck on your exam.

T - 2h 10 mins...alas, between a sick husband, the kids, work, house, an aging father, and assorted pets there has been precious little time for study. Speaking of which, why am I here? Goodbye for now.

And thank you for the good wishes.

451 posted on 04/07/2004 6:50:40 AM PDT by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
No, just responding to incoherence with incoherence. If you ever make an actual point, I'll try to respond in kind.
452 posted on 04/07/2004 7:23:04 AM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: js1138
[ No, just responding to incoherence with incoherence. If you ever make an actual point, I'll try to respond in kind. ]

This argument don't hold together..

453 posted on 04/07/2004 9:09:27 AM PDT by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
I completely agree with every word of your post!
454 posted on 04/07/2004 10:47:42 AM PDT by RobRoy (Science is about "how." Christianity is about "why.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Had no intention of refuteing it. Mocking it is more like what I doing..

Well, at least you admit that you're resorting to childish tactics when you can't address the facts that you don't like.

You not noticing that shows you might have missed other things.

I did notice. I just wonder why you mock, when it makes you look foolish rather than your opponent.
455 posted on 04/07/2004 11:03:00 AM PDT by Dimensio (I gave you LIFE! I -- AAAAAAAAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

Note: this topic was posted 4/2/2004. Thanks PatrickHenry.

456 posted on 04/22/2014 7:56:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-456 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson