Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revealed: How 'War Hero' Kerry Tried To Put Off Vietnam Military Duty
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 3-7-2004 | Charles Laurence

Posted on 03/06/2004 4:39:11 PM PST by blam

Revealed: how 'war hero' Kerry tried to put off Vietnam military duty

By Charles Laurence in New York
(Filed: 07/03/2004)

Senator John Kerry, the presumed Democratic presidential candidate who is trading on his Vietnam war record to campaign against President George W Bush, tried to defer his military service for a year, according to a newly rediscovered article in a Harvard University newspaper.

He wrote to his local recruitment board seeking permission to spend a further 12 months studying in Paris, after completing his degree course at Yale University in the mid-1960s.

The revelation appears to undercut Sen Kerry's carefully-cultivated image as a man who willingly served his country in a dangerous war - in supposed contrast to President Bush, who served in the Texas National Guard and thus avoided being sent to Vietnam.

The Harvard Crimson newspaper followed a youthful Mr Kerry in Boston as he campaigned for Congress for the first time in 1970. In the course of a lengthy article, "John Kerry: A Navy Dove Runs for Congress", published on February 18, the paper reported: "When he approached his draft board for permission to study for a year in Paris, the draft board refused and Kerry decided to enlist in the Navy."

Samuel Goldhaber, the article's author who is now a cardiologist attached to the Harvard School of Medicine, spent 11 hours trailing Mr Kerry and still remembers that the subject of the Paris deferment came up during long conversations about Vietnam.

"I stand by my story," he told The Telegraph. "It was a long time ago, and I was 19 at the time, so it is hard to remember every detail. But I do know this: at no point did Kerry contact either me or the Crimson to dispute anything I had written."

Sen Kerry's campaign headquarters in Washington refused an opportunity to deny the report. Despite repeated telephone calls from The Telegraph, a spokesman refused to comment. Another Democrat official said merely: "In Vietnam, John Kerry proved his patriotism beyond question. Everyone knows that."

A senior Republican strategist, who asked not to be named, said: "I've not heard this before. This undercuts Kerry's complaints about Bush and it continues to pose questions as to his credibility among ordinary Vietnam veterans."

He said it would fuel concerns over the way Sen Kerry made a name for himself by leading anti-war protests in Washington and Boston in the late 1960s and early 1970s after he had completed his service in the US Navy, even while his former comrades continued to fight and die.

A newly-published biography of Sen Kerry by Douglas Brinkley, A Tour of Duty, makes no mention of the requested deferment or planned year in Paris. At the time, it was still unclear just how long America would remain in Vietnam, and it might have seemed that a year's deferral of service could render enlistment unnecessary.

According to the Democratic Party's version of Sen Kerry's military history, he joined the Reserve Officer Training Corps at Harvard through eagerness to do his duty, and sailed with the Navy for combat as soon as he graduated in 1966.

Sen Kerry won a gallantry medal for his service as a gunboat captain on the Mekong Delta, and was honorably discharged with three "purple heart" medals after sustaining three wounds. He has consistently presented himself as a leader who argued against the war only after fulfilling his duty in the field. Supporters argue that his war record makes him a more trustworthy leader than President Bush, who served sporadically in the National Guard at home.

"This means that Kerry didn't jump into all that heroic service until he was pushed, and it is a very nice piece of information," said Lucianne Goldberg, a prominent Republican campaigner.

Republican strategists for President Bush were already investigating Sen Kerry's record of three wounds sustained in Vietnam. "We find that he had only one day off sick - with three wounds? What exactly were these wounds?" she asked.

Mr Goldhaber recalled that, during a day spent with Sen Kerry and one assistant during his congressional campaign, he had described his involvement, service and decision to oppose the war in great detail.

"I am not at all surprised that he wants to be president, because he exuded ambition from the word go," said Dr Goldhaber. "At the time, the idea that he tried to persuade the draft board to let him spend a year in Paris was just a detail."

A spokesman for the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign declined to comment.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1970; 2004; bandaidwounds; bush2004; deferment; draftdodgerkerry; harvard; harvardcrimson; hero; jeanquerrie; johnfrenchkerry; kerry; kerrydeferment; militaryduty; revealed; vietnam; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 next last
To: blam; null and void; autoresponder; Happy2BMe; PhilDragoo; onyx; yall
J 'F' K ... war 'Hero' !!

101 posted on 03/07/2004 9:12:51 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (The Democrats believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
I think Brinkley was probably selected to write the Kerry book because he had already established his reputation as a kneepad-wearing court historian for Democratic Presidents (and would-be Presidents).
102 posted on 03/07/2004 10:33:40 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
I'm certain you are correct, which is why I think Brinkley should be identified as such when on television, not accoded the pretense that he's an honest presidential historian.
103 posted on 03/07/2004 10:47:52 AM PST by YaYa123 (@Truth In Advertising.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: britishtim
---Is it at all possible that the White House DELIBERATELY kept this issue in the press so that when they start talking about demanding Kerry's records for his purple hearts etc., the public will remember the long outcry over Bush's records. In other words was the Bush team's "fumbling" of this issue actually an example of long term strategery?---

I believe so! Bush even brought the issue up after it was beginning to die off. Remember his comments at that NASCAR race? I think that they wanted to keep it out there because it engendered sympathy for Bush, that he was being wrongly attacked and that the NG was being attacked.

As to Kerry, what kind of "leader" leaves his men in hell and skates out after 4 months? He better have left on a stretcher! But he didn't. I saw plenty of Kerry's type when I was in the military, always sniffing around Personnel, for awards and choice assignments, always at the front of the line.

Every time the words Vietnam or veterans leave that man's lips, we need to here the echo, "When are you going to release all your military records? George Bush did."
104 posted on 03/07/2004 10:52:23 AM PST by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
A lot of the professional historians who appear on TV are even more blatantly partisan...maybe that means that Brinkley is more dangerous because he tries to come across as fair-minded.

There was an event in mid-February, rebroadcast yesterday on C-SPAN, which featured 5 authors of recent books on Presidents--3 of the historians were openly identified as Democrats and 2 claimed to be Republicans (including Kevin Phillips, author of a recent book defaming the whole Bush family). The Democrat who had written a book about Rutherford B. Hayes (Hans Trefousse) used his talk as an opportunity to make a number of cracks at Bush's expense, which went over well with the audience.

Meanwhile, the main professional organization for historians in the US, the American Historical Association, recently gave an award to Robert Byrd.

105 posted on 03/07/2004 11:26:12 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: TheWriterInTexas
Nice story about your father. He sounds like a wonderful man and true patriot. Yes, he is quite a contrast with the likes of Kerry, Clinton, and Ted Kennedy.

My dad was in WWII and Korea. Never once did he complain about it.....except for the jungle rot that he contracted. It was a job that needed to be done. My husband is a decorated pilot who volunteered to served in Vietnam. He, too, felt it was his duty to be there and to serve his country. He knew why he was there and proudly served. Nothing could have made him protest his country upon his return. The malcontents and the losers were the ones who did that. His comment about Kerry: "He's a coward." Agreed.
106 posted on 03/07/2004 11:56:09 AM PST by Swede Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: blam
Big Bush Bump
107 posted on 03/07/2004 12:38:16 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
[img]www.hunt101.com/img/113096.jpg[/img]

108 posted on 03/07/2004 3:33:02 PM PST by Menmy38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: craig_eddy
www.hunt101.com/img/113096.jpg

Not sure if this will work. Can someone help with posting pic?

Thanks,
-me
109 posted on 03/07/2004 3:35:16 PM PST by Menmy38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: blam
I have to say I am really confused. It seems the Kerry people cannot keep the story straight. In some articles he received three purple hearts and in others four purple hearts and in some the Silver Star and in others both a Silver and Gold Star. Anyone know the truth?
110 posted on 03/07/2004 4:58:37 PM PST by waRNmother.armyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menmy38
??
111 posted on 03/07/2004 5:15:53 PM PST by craig_eddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: blam
Whoa Mama this one might not stay down.
112 posted on 03/07/2004 6:17:31 PM PST by dix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
I would like to know more about Kerry's wounds.
113 posted on 03/07/2004 8:03:55 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
Trixie's been reading my posts again:

Posted by capitan_refugio to plain talk
On News/Activism 03/01/2004 1:48:45 PM PST #35 of 39

"I agree. I do question Kerry's "patriotism." I question how he got three Purple Hearts with only two days off the line. I question how he ended his tour of duty after four months. I question whether he tossed his medals and ribbons as a protest, or was fibbing about that too. I question whether or not he and his crew gunned down civilians or wounded enemies. I question whether he performed his duties in the manner of an officer in the US Navy.

"I do question his patriotism, and until he can explain or document his duty in Vietnam, I question his honesty too."

114 posted on 03/08/2004 12:09:20 AM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
And on C-Span last night about "A Tour of Duty" by Douglas Brinkley, Brinkley said that he also disobeyed orders by his brass to leave Vietnamese villagers (who by Kerry's account were sick and needed care) and continue patrol.

Why was he not admonished for disobeying orders? Of course, the coverup was that he "cared for these poor Vietnamese people". Do you believe it? I don't.
115 posted on 03/08/2004 10:28:26 AM PST by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: blam
Nasty John the Waffling French Undertaker, who is behind the atatacks on GWB's 9/11 ad, per the American Spectator.

Kerry, who is personally endorsed by Haiti's Aristide, Iran's Mullahs, Traitor "Red Jane" Fonda, Kim Jong Il, (& Kim Il Jong), Mugabe, Marxist thug Chavez of Venezuela, Castro of Cuba, & France's Jacques Chirac, is a weapon of mass economic destruction.

He'll destroy the troops in Iraq, the War on Terrorism,

& the U.S. stock market with all his negative talk and whiny-leftist-liberal sour-puss troop-bashing, Bush-bashing, America-bashing talk & self-aggrandizing, ultra-negative sourpuss whiny elitist personality.

116 posted on 03/09/2004 6:02:21 AM PST by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #117 Removed by Moderator

Comment #118 Removed by Moderator

To: ping jockey
bttt back atcha ! ;^)

119 posted on 03/09/2004 1:18:36 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (The Democrats say they believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

Comment #120 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson