Skip to comments.
Hillary Warns Kerry: Hands Off McAuliffe
NewsMax ^
| 3/5/04
| Limbacher
Posted on 03/05/2004 7:55:27 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
Uber Democrat Sen. Hillary Clinton is warning all-but-certain presidential nominee John Kerry to back off if he's thinking about replacing party chairman Terry McAuliffe before the election. Asked about rumblings that the Kerry camp wanted to toss McAuliffe over the side, Clinton told the New York Times on Friday, "Terry has helped the Democratic Party move into the 21st century to compete against the incredible interlocking institutional powers of the other side."
"A lot of plans have been laid, a lot of infrastructure put in place, and I want to see us follow through," she insisted.
The disagreement over McAuliffe's future could be just the tip of the iceberg of a growing rift between the Clintons, who, through McAuliffe, still control the party's machinery - and Sen. Kerry's political team, which now sees itself in the driver's seat.
Sen. Clinton, for instance, reminded the Times that her husband did not replace the party chairman when he became the nominee in 1992 - a none too subtle hint that she expects Kerry to follow suit.
Still, the Kerry camp is reportedly bristling over McAuliffe's antics, such as his decision to publicly allege that President Bush went AWOL from the National Guard. That stunt put the spotlight on parts of Kerry's past that he preferred not to discuss - such as his decision to team up Jane Fonda for anti-war protests in the 1970s.
Another sign of the growing rift between the Kerry and Clinton teams came late Tuesday, when Sen. Clinton offered an unenthusiastic endorsement to Kerry as the party's inevitable nominee, and did so on Japanese TV - a venue where few Americans were likely to notice.
Strategists for the Massachusetts Democrat are said considering different ways to curb McAuliffe's independence - a move that would certainly limit the influence wielded by Sen. Clinton and her husband in upcoming campaign decisions.
Still, Kerry strategists, aware that alienating the Clintons could cost their candidate in more ways than one, have to be careful not to ignite an internal civil war.
Even without McAuliffe, for example, Sen. Clinton controls the Democratic Party's presidential media fund through her right hand man Harold Ickes, who has the backing of Bush-bashing billionaire George Soros.
And other Democratic groups that will play critical roles in the 2004 election include Americans Coming Together, founded by Hillary ally Ellen Malcom, and the Center for American Progress, run by former Clinton White House chief of staff John Podesta.
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; dnc; hillary; kerry; mcauliffe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: TheGeezer
I can't see her as #2 on any ticket, myself...
#2 keeps her prominent and she avoids hard questions and a possible Senate loss in 2006. And remember, she would only be a heart beat away from the Presidency. John, how is your supply of heart pills?
21
posted on
03/05/2004 8:07:31 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: The Wizard
When are the democrats going to see they have lost control of their party, and an alien is feeding off it.ROFL Now THAT is an excellent line.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Dirty Hillary to Kerry:
"Terry is our friend - you understand? Now, I'm not threatening you, but sometimes, well, things sort of happen. So if you feel lucky, just go ahead and remove McAuliffe. Well, do you feel lucky punk? Do you?"
23
posted on
03/05/2004 8:09:22 AM PST
by
Enterprise
("Do you know who I am?")
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If the Democrats want to have any future chance of regaining power, they need to oust the Clinton machine. But, of course, the Clintons are the big fundraisers, so that is unlikely.
But if the Clintons are only backing Kerry in a lukewarm fashion, then he has no chance of winning. (He would at least have a fighting chance with the Clintons and the media putting all of their support behind him.) It seems as though, as others have pointed out, Kerry is a sacrificial offering to the electorate for 2004, leaving 2008 open for Hillary.
24
posted on
03/05/2004 8:10:17 AM PST
by
Rocky
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I'm really worried about this. Hope it doesn't damage the Democrat chances for winning in November. < /sarcasm>
LOL I love Democrat internecine feuds. May have to order more popcorn, this could be good.
25
posted on
03/05/2004 8:10:20 AM PST
by
ladtx
( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"A lot of plans have been laid, a lot of infrastructure put in place, and I want to see us follow through," she insisted.
In other words, Terry McAuliffe will be DNC chairman when MY Presidential campaign kicks off.
26
posted on
03/05/2004 8:11:41 AM PST
by
cincinnati65
(Rooting for the Panthers since 1995.......)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
So, is Kerry going to be Hillary's puppet, and allow her to dictate to him both during the campaign and during his Presidency if he gets elected????
To: InterceptPoint
alienating the Clintons could cost their candidate in more ways than one Seems that they are aware of "the list"
28
posted on
03/05/2004 8:12:23 AM PST
by
MrB
To: Rocky
...Kerry is a sacrificial offering to the electorate for 2004, leaving 2008 open for Hillary.Bingo. I think we've seen the opening shots in the sinking of the hopes of JF Kerry.
29
posted on
03/05/2004 8:12:24 AM PST
by
ladtx
( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
To: Interesting Times
Wow. We've moved beyond the VRWC. Now we're the "IIIP."=)
Funny, I like it.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Jeeze
Mac is the best thing to happen to our party
We have taken the WH, Senate & House.
Mac, hang in there we need you. . . . . .
To: Interesting Times
"the incredible interlocking institutional powers of the other side." Sounds more like her allies on the dark side of the force.
32
posted on
03/05/2004 8:13:17 AM PST
by
Enterprise
("Do you know who I am?")
To: Semper Paratus
Let the games begin!
The Clinton's have no intention of giving up party control.
33
posted on
03/05/2004 8:13:27 AM PST
by
ShandaLear
(Got Moby?)
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Jeeze
Mac is the best thing to happen to our party
We have taken the WH, Senate & House.
Mac, hang in there we need you. . . . . .
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Wow, I didn't realize I had incredible interlocking institutional powers ... I need to put those to use!
36
posted on
03/05/2004 8:13:34 AM PST
by
altura
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This will be a good test for Kerry. If he splits with the Klinton's at least he can show he's not one of their boot lickers.
37
posted on
03/05/2004 8:13:44 AM PST
by
redhawk
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
****Still, Kerry strategists, aware that alienating the Clintons could cost their candidate in more ways than one, have to be careful not to ignite an internal civil war.****
Now, this could get real good and fun to watch. A civil war in the RAT party. How civil could that be? The witch and F'ing Kerry.......
****Even without McAuliffe, for example, Sen. Clinton controls the Democratic Party's presidential media fund through her right hand man Harold Ickes, who has the backing of Bush-bashing billionaire George Soros.****
Who'da thunk it. Sen. Clintoon still controls the party's media fund via Ickes and Soros.
38
posted on
03/05/2004 8:15:20 AM PST
by
Arrowhead1952
(John f'ing Kerry is a self-admitted war criminal.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Sen. Clinton, for instance, reminded the Times that her husband did not replace the party chairman when he became the nominee in 1992 - a none too subtle hint that she expects Kerry to follow suit. Was that Ron Brown? How DID Clinton replace him anyway?
39
posted on
03/05/2004 8:15:46 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Like cannibals at an all you can eat buffet....
40
posted on
03/05/2004 8:18:16 AM PST
by
Feckless
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson