Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawlessness and civil disobedience: Hugh Hewitt says precedent set by officials leads to anarchy
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, March 3, 2004 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 03/02/2004 10:51:55 PM PST by JohnHuang2

Lawlessness and civil disobedience


Posted: March 3, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

The radical nature of the ongoing confrontation over homosexual marriage is obscured by the subject matter. Gay couples are common in large, urban areas, so their public affection hardly causes a ripple in many parts of America, but other parts of the country are scandalized.

The debate over homosexuality in general, and gay marriage in particular, is also difficult to separate from the debate over religion in public life. There is such intense anger on both sides of the issue that debates flare suddenly into shouting matches.

The issue is an albatross for John Kerry because large majorities of likely voters endorse the idea of reserving marriage to its role throughout recorded history: an institution between man and woman.

But put aside the politics, and put aside the particulars of the debate. The real issue here is the rule of law and the precedent that the mayor of San Francisco and other small-time, small-minded publicity addicts are setting.

No matter what your particular cause, you have to be taking notes right now. Whether it is Second Amendment absolutism, or a certain view that the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause allows for prayer in school, a passion for a particular issue burns in many hearts across America.

Previous to February 2004, however, enthusiasts of minority views and radical views knew that the law would not allow them to indulge their own concepts of how the world ought to be. The mayor of Small Town, Anywhere, couldn't start issuing permits for machine guns even if he believed that such permits were constitutionally protected, and the prayer warrior who happened to be the county administrator in Middle Sized Burg, America, couldn't take his view of the Constitution into a classroom and begin leading worship with the Lord's Prayer followed by a few of the great old hymns.

A city council in California couldn't decide that the Endangered Species Act was an encroachment on 10th Amendment rights and start bulldozing spotted owl habitat for a new park.

A mayor in Texas couldn't decide to widen the local river by 10 feet without a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers in order to hasten the arrival of a new river-walk feature to generate downtown business.

The mayor of Las Vegas can't exempt the new casino's ownership from the collective bargaining laws of America, and the mayor of Indianapolis can't simply say gambling is a good thing and license a casino operator to open for business.

A mayor in Oregon cannot issue driving licenses to illegal aliens in that state because she thinks they are hard pressed to find work without them.

A mayor in Des Moines cannot order the sheriff to open the jail and free all the prisoners because his reading of the Eighth Amendment has led him to conclude that conditions in the local lockdown constitute "cruel and unusual" punishment.

The mayor of Atlanta cannot pardon those on death row in Georgia, and the mayor of Washington, D.C., cannot declare the airspace over the White House open for small aircraft traffic.

You get the picture.

Civil society depends upon the actions of local elected officials and state elected officials and federal officials obeying the law as it is widely understood and not abandoning the law when their personal view of how it ought to be is not how it is.

The mayor of San Francisco has done a terrible thing by popularizing the idea that conscience should trump law. There is a tradition of brave souls who went to jail for their beliefs in order to draw attention to their cause. But San Francisco has no part in that tradition, and there is no courage or honor in a simple exercise of will.

The paralysis which has greeted the one-man rule in San Francisco is astonishing, and long after the issue of gay marriage is settled by application of the Defense Of Marriage Act, an amendment to the Constitution, or by the successful imposition of the new cultural norm by judicial diktat, the failure to oppose simple prerogative will carry a heavy cost.

Societies cannot endure without agreed upon rules of law and their uniform application. No serious person believes that the charade in San Francisco is legal, but neither has it been stopped by those charged with upholding the laws of the state.

The folks at the extreme of every issue have noticed: The best offense is aggressive, unilateral action – even if it involves lawbreaking. The best defense will be the videotape from San Francisco.





TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: activistjudges; activistmayors; anarchy; christianlife; civildisobedience; civilunion; homosexual; homosexualagenda; hughhewitt; marriage; prisoners; samesaxmarriage; sf; stunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: JohnHuang2; *Homosexual Agenda
Now a county in OREGON is granting Homo Marriage licenses !
When's it gonna end !?


21 posted on 03/03/2004 6:42:29 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (The Democrats believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"Gay couples are common in large, urban areas, so their public affection hardly causes a ripple in many parts of America, but other parts of the country are scandalized."

I'm sure their deviant public displays of affection, prompted by another symptom of their mental illness, exibitionism, doesn't cause a ripple in the morally dead areas of the country, but in areas that still have enough of a moral conscience not to engage in pubic displays of affection themeselves, it is a scandal.
22 posted on 03/03/2004 6:51:06 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Because Clinton was the role-model for law-breaking politicos, that they could break the law and nothing would be done about it!
23 posted on 03/03/2004 7:06:11 AM PST by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; Squantos; glock rocks
"No matter what your particular cause, you have to be taking notes right now. Whether it is Second Amendment absolutism, or a certain view that the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause allows for prayer in school, a passion for a particular issue burns in many hearts across America. "

PING

24 posted on 03/03/2004 7:07:45 AM PST by B4Ranch (Don't be so open-minded your brains fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; Squantos; glock rocks
As yet another example of the blatant double-standards involved in politics, can you imagine what the state and federal reaction would be if, say, a city governor ignored the 1994 AW ban and declared that anyone owning an evil, black rifle could put a scary flashider on the muzzle? Or even further, started selling same to any citizen who wanted one, without processing a 4473 or NICS check?

Can we say, "Roll in the tanks"? I knew you could.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

25 posted on 03/03/2004 7:23:33 AM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; Happy2BMe
Can you imagine the Federal reaction to a city and county that is armed similarly to a military unit? One where the mayors and the sheriff says, "I will not enforce your federal law restricting the people right to self defense."
26 posted on 03/03/2004 8:19:55 AM PST by B4Ranch (Don't be so open-minded your brains fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
LOL............Yep ! That was brought up in faggot wedding thang. Some was suggesting a local sheriff quickly start issuing CHL's if the laws of the state of Kalipronia were deemed moot !

It would have been a hoot !....Stay safe !

27 posted on 03/03/2004 9:08:40 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; ALOHA RONNIE; DLfromthedesert; PatiPie; flamefront; onyx; SMEDLEYBUTLER; Irma; ...
"Societies cannot endure without agreed upon rules of law and their uniform application.

No serious person believes that the charade in San Francisco is legal, but neither has it been stopped by those charged with upholding the laws of the state.

The folks at the extreme of every issue have noticed: The best offense is aggressive, unilateral action – even if it involves lawbreaking. The best defense will be the videotape from San Francisco." - Hugh Hewitt

.


www.HughHewitt.com
PING!

If you listen to Hugh Hewitt,
or read his WorldNetDaily articles,
or his commentary at the Weekly Standard,
then this PING list is for YOU!

Please post your comments, and BUMP!

(If you want OFF - or ON - my "Hugh Hewitt PING list" - please let me know)

28 posted on 03/04/2004 5:15:56 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
...a passion for a particular issue burns in many hearts across America...

Guess my burning issue and win a shiny, new dime.

The real issue here is the rule of law and the precedent that the mayor of San Francisco and other small-time, small-minded publicity addicts are setting.

The real issue here is the rule of law and the precedent that the current and past presidents of the U.S. and other tax-spending, sovereignty-selling, vote-buying cheap labor addicts and politicians are setting.

Civil society depends upon the actions of local elected officials and state elected officials and federal officials obeying the law as it is widely understood and not abandoning the law when their personal view of how it ought to be is not how it is.

The rule of law no longer applies, Hugh, and it hasn't for a long, long time.

Societies cannot endure without agreed upon rules of law and their uniform application.

Have no fear 'cause Vicente's gonna be here to pick up what's left of this country.

29 posted on 03/04/2004 5:37:14 PM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
And why wasn't it stopped? Because liberal judges refused to stop it!!

30 posted on 03/04/2004 6:28:09 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Bump!
31 posted on 03/05/2004 8:03:30 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Bump!
32 posted on 03/05/2004 8:06:20 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Clinton signed the defense of marriage act in 1996, that ended that. It's Bush who is divisive.
33 posted on 03/06/2004 6:38:43 AM PST by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu
I happen to believe that the country is slowly heading towards an armed civil war withing 25 years. It takes time for civil wars to occur, they dont occur overnight. But the animous in the country is pointing to an eventual violent war.
34 posted on 03/06/2004 6:44:04 AM PST by raloxk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: raloxk
==But the animous in the country is pointing to an eventual violent war.===

Yes, between the backers and the opponents of the second amendment. I'm ready.
35 posted on 03/06/2004 3:58:24 PM PST by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson