Skip to comments.
McClintock to Talk About SF Homosexual "Marriages" on Savage and O'Reilly
N/A
| 2-18-04
| N/A
Posted on 02/18/2004 3:14:41 PM PST by go_tom
California State Senator Tom McClintock will be on with Michael Savage at 5:30PM PST and then on the O'Reilly Factor to discuss the marriage licenses being issued in SF.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: homosexual; homosexualagenda; marriage; mcclintock; newsom; oreilly; sanfrancisco; savage; sf; stunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-178 next last
To: Revel
"I would be worried that in 2008 Arnold might be running for President." He can't. He's not American born.
21
posted on
02/18/2004 4:24:52 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITIONS 55-58)
To: Revel
Aaahhh...
Not possible because he's not a natural-born citizen?
22
posted on
02/18/2004 4:25:48 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(Unless the world is made safe for Democracy, Democracy won't be safe in the world.)
To: kellynla
Well that is true isn't it. You got me there. Never thought of that. Although I have heard talk of changing that. Lets hope not.
23
posted on
02/18/2004 4:47:50 PM PST
by
Revel
To: stopem
O'Reilly doesn't *care* about the marriages themselves.
However, he's very big on the rule of law and the anarchy that's currently in place.
To: go_tom
C'mon. You guys really think Arnold will do anything? What would the Kennedys think?!?!
My bet is that Arnold will take the course that brings the most money to California. If supporting gay marriages puts more money in California's coffers, he'll rubber stamp it without a blink. If not... Well, he said all along he was a social liberal.
25
posted on
02/18/2004 4:52:22 PM PST
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: Gritty
You asked the question I've been asking. I wish this state had one mayor with the guts to start handing out concealed carry permits to all comers, on the grounds that state gun control laws are unconstitutional.
Let's see what it takes to get Bill Lockyer's attention.
26
posted on
02/18/2004 5:11:52 PM PST
by
Argus
To: All
McClintock hit another grand slam on the Factor! He laid out the responsibility of Governor RINOld and the CA AG. It's their ultimate responsibility to enforce the laws of CA. Art Torres thinks the queers in SF have the right to break the law. I wonder if I can use that for a defense the next time I get sighted for speeding? ROFLMAO
27
posted on
02/18/2004 5:21:48 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITIONS 55-58)
To: All
Oops! LOL sighted=cited
28
posted on
02/18/2004 5:24:15 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITIONS 55-58)
To: zygoat
Yeah I'm sure that if Tom had brought in State troopers immediately that the liberal media would have just loved that.
I can see the images now of poor crying heartbroken liberals who are just "in love".
Being pushed back from the steps of city hall by the "Troopers" double entandre. Sent in by the "Far right, conservative governor".
Yep, it would have been wonderful. . . .
29
posted on
02/18/2004 5:28:47 PM PST
by
Tempest
(Sigh.. ....)
To: Luis Gonzalez
So true. That's why I get so much amuzement from the yap his cheerleaders spew.
Ohhhh Oh Then Tom would have put on his battle gear and engaged in lethal combat with the liberal state legislator, and fought the dragon, rescued the princess and saved the kingdom!!!
Ohhhh he would have I tell ya!
30
posted on
02/18/2004 5:31:30 PM PST
by
Tempest
(Sigh.. ....)
To: go_tom
We need a SAVAGE Nation!
31
posted on
02/18/2004 5:36:07 PM PST
by
Luke FReeman
(Red Diaper Babies- who needs 'em?)
.
32
posted on
02/18/2004 5:37:00 PM PST
by
Luke FReeman
(Red Diaper Doper Babies- who needs 'em?)
To: go_tom
Ahhhhhh! Yes, Where are all the Kneepad RHINO's who were telling everyone These Fudgepacking issues have nothing to do with a State Governor.
Do you think these Weirdo's could at least be fined if not locked up for breaking a law?
Who Knew Huh!
To: All
I understand why they aren't stopping this. They don't want it to rise to a level of civil disobedience and equate it to the race related civil rights movement of the 50's and 60's. [gay groups would have you believe they don't want it, african-american's REALLY don't want it].
If they arrest the government officials in SF they have raised these officials to civil rights martyrs.
34
posted on
02/18/2004 5:40:30 PM PST
by
olde north church
(American's aren't more violent, we're just better shots!!!)
To: All
I think Ahrnold is concerned about the queers protesting him and his policies. I can hear the fags now, "I'll be back," (sweetie)!
To: Revel
"....To afraid of Morrals...."Too afraid of Morrals.
(+)
To afraid of Morals
=
Too afraid of Morals
This means in a 4 word sentence you misspelled 2 words. But hey, you're still batting 500.
(The Spell-Checker is our friend)
36
posted on
02/18/2004 5:50:22 PM PST
by
DoctorMichael
(Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
To: olde north church
If they arrest the government officials in SF they have raised these officials to civil rights martyrsSo what? The nation is a mess. The judiciary is making laws, executives are interpreting laws and legislatures are sitting around with their thumbs up there asses acting as wind vanes.
The executive in California should execute the damn laws and arrest the law breakers. The judiciary should interpret the law and find the Mayor guilty of violating numerous codes that were eneacted by the legislature.
And then they should throw the Mayors behind in a cell for 6 months so he can martyr to his hearts content.
37
posted on
02/18/2004 5:56:31 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: All
McClintock was just on Michael Savage. He pretty much laid it out again that the mayor in SF is breaking the law and if the CA AG won't enforce the law then it is ultimately up to Governor RINOld to enforce the law. Well I guess that pretty much leaves it up to all of us to break any laws we like and claim that the law is "unconstitutional." ROFLMAO I won't say "I told you so" but RINOld is proving my point. If you eat too many of those steroids your testicles turn into raisins! Looks like we may have to have another recall election...Damn if I can put up with this nonsense for another two years!
38
posted on
02/18/2004 5:56:53 PM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITIONS 55-58)
To: Ron in Acreage
Did you heard the City Attorney (or someone) say that since the text of the licenses were altered from state law that they are invalid and fraudulent??
39
posted on
02/18/2004 6:21:35 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://www.ArmorforCongress.com..............................send a FReeper to Congress!)
To: jwalsh07
They are trying to turn this into a civil disobedience issue. You turn it into a civil disobedience by arresting them. Then what? They get on television and they can raise their fists in the air and tell the world they are fighting for the rights of all? They are getting press now but not as much as if they were getting arrested. They are suffocating rather than fanning the flames.
40
posted on
02/18/2004 6:30:00 PM PST
by
olde north church
(American's aren't more violent, we're just better shots!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-178 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson