Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The King is Dead, Long Live the King!
Viewpointjournal.com ^ | October 15, 2003 | David Flanagan

Posted on 10/15/2003 9:45:02 PM PDT by dpflanagan

THE KING IS DEAD
The “I feel your pain” President is gone and it seems now that his legacy of electoral success is irrecoverable. Perhaps he pushed the envelope just one too many times, or maybe the former President’s brand of politics just cannot be properly wielded by anyone but Bill Clinton himself. Like Excalibur to Arthur, so are Clinton and his ability to create controversy and dodge the consequences.

Its clear to me that Excalibur will not be wielded by anyone other than the former King himself. Furthermore, the wielding of this weapon seems to have harmed Clinton's party far more than it ever hurt the Republican Party. From the day that Bill Clinton took office to today, his party has experienced a steady decline in influence throughout the nation.

The latest example of this is Bill Clinton’s complete failure to help Gray Davis salvage his failing Governorship. I have to believe that our former President pulled out all of his old slings and arrows during the campaign. Governor-elect Schwarzenegger was painted as an abuser of women, a manipulator, a druggy, and who knows what else. Ultimately, though, It may all have backfired

Not only did Schwarzenegger win, he won so clearly and decisively that all the lawsuits being contemplated by the opposition will now be far more difficult to carry out. Had the recall been close, at least Davis could have tied things up in court for several months on the claim of voter “disenfranchisement.” But Davis lost big, and that should be a sign to the party of the defeated that their king is well and truly gone.

Perhaps old king Clinton was just a myth in the first place. Whatever he was, his time has come and gone, and he will not return. If Democratic leaders wish to again take on the mantle of leadership, I believe that they must first throw off the legacy of the Clinton Presidency, and depose all of his former servants, starting with DNC Chairman Terry McAullife. But, for them to do so, they must have a new king, and a new direction, and the question of who to them is just as vexing as their inability to gain any political ground against their Republican rivals

LONG LIVE THE KING!
Democratic leaders may be too confused or too out of touch with the American people to act, but the hard left of their party has already endorsed their new candidate, former Governor of Vermont, Howard Dean, and are pressing towards his coronation as the new heir-elect of the Democratic throne. Its a strange but true fact that, even as you read these words, the hard left of the Democratic Party is trying to replace the “I feel your pain” President with an “I feed your pain” presidential candidate.

Before I go on, let me reiterate my firm belief that this strange co-dependent relationship between Dean and angry Dems does not reflect the mood of the entire party. Its even possible that they are a minority. But, unfortunately for Democratic Party leaders, theirs is the dominant voice, fueled by frustration and anger and egged on by Dean and the mainstream press. You could, I believe, make the case that this segment of the party is in the throes of a full-fledged temper tantrum.

Just like any child in the midst of a tantrum, they are running, not on logic, but on pure emotion and they don’t care who sees them, figuratively speaking, lying on the floor with arms and legs flailing. Unfortunately, their incessant whining has been aided and abetted by the mainstream media, who are only too happy to echo any and all complaints against a conservative president.

But, is Howard Dean the heir-elect of the hard left because he is one of them, or is it simply because he recognized and effectively tapped into this anger in pursuit of the Democratic nomination? One thing is certain, its easier to influence people who are running on emotion, and the hard left of the Democratic party has been exceptionally emotional since their candidate, Al Gore, lost his bid for the presidency in 2000.

So what does this mean for conservatives? Its hard to say, but in the short term, I believe that this divided Democratic party will continue to flounder. Before things have any hope of getting better for them, the angry left is going to have to get some counseling, and the Democratic Party overall is going to have to moderate its stance on many issues.

Ever since Bush took office, Democrats in Washington, D.C. have been falling over themselves to remake their image as the “anti-Bush” party. As a strategy, it has failed miserably, mainly because 9/11 reminded us that we live in an incredibly dangerous world and that our government, no matter who is at the helm, must fulfill its duty to provide for the common defense.

You can critisize President Bush for being too aggressive regarding Iraq, but at least he has heard the wishes of the vast majority of Americans and has responded in a positive way. As for Dems, I still have not seen any kind of positive vision for America coming out of their campaigns. All they continue to do is Bash the president and float possible plans to deal with Medicare (spend more money), taxes (repeal them all yesterday), and education (spend LOTS more money).

For those of you who may not be aware, none of the above constitutes a VISION, rather, they are all just IDEAS. A vision tells Americans where a candidate, or an elected official, the direction they would like to see the country go. Visionary leaders have a big picture view of the world and can convey a sense of confident, positive direction to citizens, effectively rallying their support.

Soon after 9/11, President Bush created a visionfor the American people of a world that was free of terrorism. He offered up the vision FIRST, then explained the steps that would be taken to make the vision a reality. So, in a very real way, the nine remaining Democratic presidential hopefuls have gotten the horse before the cart. If they want support and attention, they need to work on THEIR vision for our future, and sell it every day.

Has any of the nine presented a comprehensive vision yet? I don’t believe they have. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong.

David Flanagan
Viewpointjournal.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; candidate; clinton; dead; dean; democrat; election; gore; iraq; king; left; president; republican

1 posted on 10/15/2003 9:45:03 PM PDT by dpflanagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan
Bravo, bravo and Amen!
2 posted on 10/15/2003 9:55:30 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan
Great read, Kudos to you, for a spot on observation
3 posted on 10/15/2003 10:01:20 PM PDT by MJY1288 (This is your tagline "Bush/Cheney04", this is your tagline on drugs "AnyOtherChoice/04")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan; JohnHuang2
From one Marylander to another, Congrats on a great essay and I believe this deserves a Mega Ping from the King of Ping,

Paging "The King of Ping" JohnHuang2,

Your long reaching arm of ping list is needed for this excellent essay

4 posted on 10/15/2003 10:08:55 PM PDT by MJY1288 (This is your tagline "Bush/Cheney04", this is your tagline on drugs "AnyOtherChoice/04")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan
We come here not to praise Bill Clinton, But to bury him.

His 1992 campaign was the last real victory of the Democrat Party. Despite rampant evidence of being a B.S. artist and the first rumbles of bimbo eruptions the majority of voting Americans reelected him in '96 (women reelected him, actually). By then the machine was in place that enabled thousands of aliens instant citizenship and a nice old lady to lead them where to vote Democrat.

Now the Chinese celebrate getting a man in space at least four years before they would have had that opportunity. Bill Clinton, president-for-Hire with no scruples, made that happen.
5 posted on 10/15/2003 10:11:08 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus (The Constitution doesn't guarantee cradle-to-grave safety. Nor should it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan; ohioWfan; Molly Pitcher; Miss Marple; Utah Girl; Howlin; rintense; Mo1; mtngrl@vrwc; ...
Outstanding!
6 posted on 10/15/2003 10:11:37 PM PDT by kayak (Have you donated to FR yet? Visit the FReepathon thread and help keep the lights on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan
I see a bit lip coming
7 posted on 10/15/2003 10:13:32 PM PDT by woofie (I want to die peacefully in my sleep like Grandpa ...not screaming,like the passengers in his car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan
If the Republicans were smart, they would hire Clinton to campaign full-time for the Democrats next year.
8 posted on 10/15/2003 10:16:18 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan
Excellent article. I totally agree that only Clinton can do his kind of politics, otherwise, it is a case of 'the emperor has no clothes.'
9 posted on 10/15/2003 10:19:37 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan
I have to believe that our former President pulled out all of his old slings and arrows during the campaign. Governor-elect Schwarzenegger was painted as an abuser of women, a manipulator, a druggy, and who knows what else.


Well when it comes to abusing women, manipulating people, abusing drugs, and who knows what else. No one I submit is better at it than willard.
10 posted on 10/15/2003 10:24:05 PM PDT by Valin (I have my own little world, but it's okay - they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan
Terrific analysis..Ping!
11 posted on 10/15/2003 10:34:28 PM PDT by lainde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan
YOU SAID: "If Democratic leaders wish to again take on the mantle of leadership, I believe that they must first throw off the legacy of the Clinton Presidency, and depose all of his former servants, starting with DNC Chairman Terry McAullife"

I agree .. this point is crucial.

YOU SAID: "Before things have any hope of getting better for them, the angry left is going to have to get some counseling"

Maybe 40-50 years out of power would do the trick!

I keep wondering if the rank and file democrats are about to take down the hard left. The takedown will be so hard and so decisive, it will take years and years to regroup and find a real vision.

I remember the democrats I met during impeachment .. the ones who emailed me to apologize for Barbara Boxer. They told me CA deserved better. We might not agree on some policy issues, but we agreed on truth, integrity, honesty .. the most important things.

While I still don't believe the democrats truly understand what the security of America is all about .. or that it doesn't depend on the outmoded opinions of other nations .. it depends on OUR ABILITY TO PROTECT OURSELVES.

Loved your article .. it hits the nail right on the head!
12 posted on 10/15/2003 10:52:04 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpflanagan
Somehow I felt drawn to this thread.....
13 posted on 10/15/2003 11:33:27 PM PDT by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kayak; dpflanagan
Great essay, dpflanagan! Thanks for the heads up, kayak!
14 posted on 10/16/2003 10:35:09 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl (Please donate to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson