Posted on 07/17/2002 10:47:58 AM PDT by SheLion
GREEN BAY, Wis., July 17 /PRNewswire/ -- Green Bay Packer Ahman Green's participation in a Wisconsin ad campaign designed to raise awareness about the dangers of secondhand smoke was unveiled today. Green will be part of a series of television and radio advertisements that launched early-June and are being broadcast throughout Wisconsin. The new ads use personal stories told by Wisconsin residents who have suffered the effects of secondhand smoke.
Green is not a smoker himself, but he grew up in a household with a smoker and was diagnosed with asthma at age 14. The 25-year-old running back has to pay special attention to avoid smoke-filled environments in order to perform at his best. His personal experience and concerns for his own health and that of others has inspired him to share his story in hopes that it will lead to a smoke-free Wisconsin.
"Because my asthma is aggravated by secondhand smoke, I have to be very careful where I go. My options of which restaurants to eat at or what places I can go to often depend on whether there will be cigarette smoke in the air," says Green. "This can be frustrating and limiting, but staying healthy is important to me and vital to my career."
Green is featured in a television ad that takes place in a cafe. As he enters the smoke-filled cafe, he slips an oxygen mask over his face. The ad conveys the message that secondhand smoke can have serious effects on a nonsmoker. One of the most obvious places where cigarette smoke lingers is in bars and restaurants. Kathie Bundy, pub owner and performer from Manitowoc, WI is featured, along with Ahman Green, in the campaign ads. Bundy opened Stage Door Saloon, one of just a few nonsmoking pubs in Wisconsin. She is featured in a television ad that takes place in a smoke-filled restaurant. Bundy's story is meant to encourage other restaurants and bars to go smoke- free.
"Between concerns about my own health and complaints from nonsmoking customers, I decided that it was the right decision to go smoke-free," Bundy says. "Of course I had concerns about the repercussions this decision would have on my business, but the pub is as busy as ever and customers are happy they have a place to go that isn't filled with smoke."
Restaurant owners who are currently smoke-free or those owners who are considering making their restaurant smoke-free, can advertise their restaurant free of charge on the new Wisconsin Smoke-free Online Dining Guide. Owners simply log onto WWW.HADENOUGHWISCONSIN.COM , enter the Smoke-free Dining Guide section and submit requested information. All restaurant details will be verified and then posted. The new site feature was designed to encourage restaurants to go smoke-free and to support restaurant owners and customers that prefer a smoke-free environment.
The secondhand smoke media campaign is a component of the WTCB's statewide initiative for smoke-free restaurants, work sites, municipal buildings and homes. Each ad contains a tag line that directs viewers to the hadenoughwisconsin.com web site where visitors can share their own stories or seek help in quitting smoking.
The Wisconsin Tobacco Control Board is a Governor-appointed Board charged with developing a strategic plan, allocating funds and evaluating the effectiveness of Wisconsin's tobacco prevention and control efforts. The Board is comprised of state and local leaders representing businesses, education, health care, public health and political leaders from across the state.
Patiently waiting.
I know what that's like. My mother died from lung cancer in 1984 at the age of 47. It was a devastating loss. But she never smoked a cigarette in her life. She was not exposed to second hand smoke. Nor did she ever drink a drop of alchohol. She lived in a farm environment, and largely had a diet of mostly unprocessed healthy organic locally grown foods.
So why in the world did she get cancer? It seems so unfair. The only thing resembling a vice was she was a big Pepsi drinker. So maybe we should ban soda pop. And it is marketed strongly to CHILDREN!! There is no denying that it isn't good for you, yet many kids today drink more soda than water. Some of your comrades in the war against smoking do in fact have their eye on the soft drink industry already.
Actually, the way I believe my mother got cancer was from the medical profession itself. I'll not get too deeply into details here, but she was given a radiation cocktail by a specialist to treat a thyroid problem, and that is what gave her cancer, IMO
Meanwhile, our neighbor smoked a pack and a half of non filtered Pall-Mall's every day his entire life, worked his farm into his 80's, was never hospitalized for illness, and lived to the age of 97. Go figure.
Cancer is usually caused by a combination of things. Second hand smoke may be a contributing factor, but that alone is likely not the cause. If a doctor is telling you it is, well, I have not anything positive to say about him.
The anti smoking crusaders have for years presented deceptive, unproven and exaggeerated information regarding SHS. Why should one trust these people who lie?
The following quote is from the President of the American Council on Science and Health in New York, who certainly does not approve of smoking.
"By exaggerating, the Coalition [for a Smoke-Free New York ] only serves to give ammunition to those who are both generally skeptical of public health "meddling," and to those who maintain that health advocates, motivated by "the end justifies the means" philosophy, frequently play quick and dirty with the facts in an attempt to justify the interventions they want . When they see an ad like the one the Coalition ran this week, these critics of public health may rush to defend existing smoking policies in restaurants and bars."Public health policy is best advanced by policies that stick closely to the scientific facts—while recognizing that the best way to lose a legitimate argument is to overstate and exaggerate it."
Warning: Overstating the Case Against Secondhand Smoke is Unnecessary—and Harmful to Public Health Policy
The main issue between smokers and non should be respect for one another. Legislation is not the answer and everyone should realize that the do gooders will not end their "protect you from yourself" campaign with smoking.
They're coming for you next. Conservatives who hate smoking should still oppose legislation.
Smoking is certainly not good for anyone. But, on the other hand, this is not mustard gas we're talking about either, as some anti-smoking groups would like the public to believe. Your right to breathe clean air exists until you step onto private proerty, and then it is superseded by the property owners rights to do what he wishes with his property. You have the right to turn around and take your business elsewhere if you so choose.
There are always going to be rude people...who cut in line at the movies or cut you off in traffic or insensitive smokers versus nonsmokers... this is the exception not the rule. Legislation is gasoline on the fire. It will end up burning non-smokers as well.
Uh, actually, where I shoot hoops, its the smokers who don't get chosen. That lack of cardiovascular health is a real impediment when playing full court.
...and HOMES !!!!!!HOMES !!!
Is this a state or what!!!!
I didn't expect you to get it. Your steady stream of inane comments on this forum for the past 4 years is quite well known to me.
I don't know why I'm bothering to reply to you, because you still won't get it... but it's not about "elevating" the right to smoke. It's about totalitarian government that will eventually come after the things that you do consider "vital personal liberty". It's a snowball effect and if you support it now, you cannot stop it just before it rolls through your yard.
You cannot destroy the rights of the few without destroying the rights of all. It don't work that way bub.
Exactly. And if it does allow smoking, YOU go somewhere else.
The argument develops when the state enacts legislation to FORCE business owners to not allow smoking or provide a seperate smoking area.
It should be up to the business owner to decide, absolutely not the state. The consumer then has the choice to patronize the business or not. If it is not profitable to the business owner to allow smoking, he will voluntarily prohibit it. Or vice versa.
From the article:
"...statewide initiative for smoke-free restaurants, work sites, municipal buildings and homes."
They wish to legislate what you do in your home - and smoking is only the beginning.
Perhaps one day soon, it will be considered not healthy (and illegal) to teach your child about that pesky Christ figure.
...and HOMES !!!!!!HOMES !!!
Good catch - this is exactly where the danger lies. Non smoking conservative should recognize this gigantic red flag.
I pointed you to a study that shows that exposure to certain chemicals causes a VASTLY HIGHER STASTICAL chance of getting cancer than a normal human that is NOT exposed to that chemical.
Again I ask you, show you the study/proof. Show you the death certificate that proves WHAT.
I've complyed with your request, can you comply with mine?
OK, you say prohibition. It's been tried and people still drank, still got in accidents involving alchohol.
The Libertarians, according to you, say that no law should be involved, they should be able to drink and drive.
My common sense tells me that if you drink alchohol your reflexes are impaired. We will not get people to stop drinking alchohol. If you drink alchohol you should have a designated driver that does NOT drink alchohol.
Common sense.
I think you should take a look at the World Health Organizatiuons study on SHS, the largest of it's kind in the world.
The only thing it proved was that there was NOT a correlation between SHS and ANY other health condition that was not already pre-existing.
So if you really like chocolate ice cream and in fact won't eat any other kind, and the ice cream parlor down the street sells every kind but chocolate, would you characterize yourself as selfish for not patronizing this particular ice cream parlor?
What makes you think that smokers are trying to emulate Mother Theresa? Making choices in a free capitalist society is what adults do, obviously an alien concept to you.
Do you think that constant repetition of the "selfish" argument will somehow make it a good one?
I don't even know why I'm responding to you, it's like trying to reason with a street person.
I posted on one of these tobacco threads right after I created my FR account, BOY was that a mistake. hehe After I had a spirited (smile) discussion with many of the "regulars" here, I came to the realization that some simply will not accept that second hand smoke is toxic! I was shocked by this, but then I started to think about the situation for a moment here.
Speaking to my fellow FReepers that believe SHS is toxic (as I do): All these people are saying is, LET BUSINESSES do what they WANT with their business, as long as it's still LEGAL (which smoking is). If the anti-smokers want to eliminate smoking so bad, they should not only show that shs is toxic, but get the EPA to classify it as such. (of course they can't, because SHS, while toxic, is NOT THAT toxic).
I myself had a hard time accepting the right of a small business (resturant or bar) owner allowing this in their place, simply because SHS is toxic, and to me, it's exceedingly FOOLISH of a bar or resturant owner to not at least set up separate sections for smokers and non smokers. But, this is America, and people should have the RIGHT TO BE STUPID, whether it be through INDIVIDUAL choices, or BUSINESS choices.
Just my two cents. And all you regulars, please don't challenge me to post "proof" of SHS's toxicity, because I already have, back in last November, and I honestly don't think anyone read them. But that's fine, because I'm not going to try and argue that small business owners can't do what they want with their business anymore. That would be even more foolish.
And only one? Aren't there more pertaining to the same?
And if someone is 78 and contracts this, does it really matter?
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.