Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Reilly: Bush Insider Claims Clinton Deal Torpedoed Pardongate
News max ^ | 06/21/2002 | With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 06/21/2002 6:46:21 PM PDT by dts32041

O'Reilly: Bush Insider Claims Clinton Deal Torpedoed Pardongate

A Bush administration insider has privately leaked word that a deal was struck between Democratic congressional leaders and the Bush White House not to prosecute Bill and/or Hillary Clinton on an array of charges related to the Pardongate scandal, Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly claimed Friday on his nationally syndicated "Radio Factor" show.

"A very highly placed source - and I mean this guy knows what's going on in the Bush administration - told me about a month ago that when President Bush took office he had meetings with all of the Democratic leadership.... one on one meetings in the Oval Office," O'Reilly said.

"The Democratic leadership made it quite clear to Mr. Bush that he would not get any cooperation - zero - on the part of the Democrats in the Senate and in the House if he pursued any kind of a criminal investigation against Bill Clinton."

O'Reilly said that according to his source, "Basically they said look, if you embarrass us - by us we mean the Democratic Party - if you, Bush-Ashcroft, indict Clinton on bribery or go after Hillary or any of this - we're gonna shut you down. We're not gonna do anything. You're not going to get any (legislation) passed if four years."

The talk host's highly placed administration source said Democrat leaders then explained to Bush, "If you put this thing on the back track and just play the game the way we've always played it here in the Justice Department since Watergate, where the powerful protect each other - then we'll keep an open mind on your legislation."

O'Reilly never indicated who his source might be beyond describing him as "very highly placed."

On Thursday, U.S. Attorney for New York's Southern District James Comey, a Bush appointee, ended a key part of the probe into whether the Clintons traded pardons for political favors and campaign contributions.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; bushknew; bushknew911; clinton; oreilly; pardongate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last
To: MHGinTN
Just think

A nation that will drive across town to save a nickel on gallon of gas, but the government steals and squanders trillions over the years and few care enough to give it a couple of minutes of thought in their lives.

Thousands of dollars per person per year pissed away, no one cares! We get the government we deserve.

21 posted on 06/21/2002 7:13:22 PM PDT by listenhillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I think even if there was a picture of GW shooting someone and then doing a victory dance on the dead body, you will still not accept any criticism of the President. There is no difference between you and the Clinton loyalists.
22 posted on 06/21/2002 7:18:12 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I agree with Miss Marple. This stinks like Bill Kristol.
23 posted on 06/21/2002 7:18:48 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
GW doesn't look like anyone who would tolerate being threatened

Are you nuts? GW does not need to be threatened. All he needs to be told is that his poll number may diminish. That is enough for him to strike any deal.

24 posted on 06/21/2002 7:20:41 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Torie
I dont think those were the words that were used. There are lots of ways to threaten someone without being confrontational.
25 posted on 06/21/2002 7:22:32 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Sadly, I believe every word of this. I always thought in some way the Bush's were being blackmailed. The evidence against those two clinton creeps was too obvious. It's now up to Larry Klayman and I've given up on him.
26 posted on 06/21/2002 7:27:59 PM PDT by Lucky2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
If you ask me, this:

O'Reilly said that according to his source, "Basically they said look, if you embarrass us - by us we mean the Democratic Party - if you, Bush-Ashcroft, indict Clinton on bribery or go after Hillary or any of this - we're gonna shut you down. We're not gonna do anything. You're not going to get any (legislation) passed if four years."

is all the more reason to take them to the mat. Threaten me and I kick your ass! That's the American way! That's the Texan way. Get the TRUTH out there for all to see and then let the chips fall where they may. I believe that public opinion will go with honesty and decency. Caving in will only lower the Bush administration down to the level of the Clintons.

You can't fight a war if the people don't believe in you and your word, Mr. President. Do the right thing!!! We will support you. We've been waiting for it, longing for it, praying for it, even begging for it. Justice needs to prevail. Tell the truth about the Clintons. Any Democrat still around after the voters get the truth will most likely be with you. Have faith!

27 posted on 06/21/2002 7:28:08 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria
It had to be a bluff and apparently W fell for it.

My guess would be that Xlintons have dirt on all of them. One of those "If I go down, we're all going down" kinda things.

28 posted on 06/21/2002 7:28:54 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
There's a lot of difference between Miss M and Clinton loyalists. She's smarter and she's prettier

and she's right.

29 posted on 06/21/2002 7:31:57 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Should be easy to find out. Did The President have meetings one on one with each rat last year?
30 posted on 06/21/2002 7:32:51 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altura
Since you say so, it must be true.
31 posted on 06/21/2002 7:36:56 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
If this is true, then congressional democrat leaders ought to be investigated for obstucting justice and threatening our President.

Moreover, actually, just how much legislation, promulgation, restriction can we possibly need. This is why term limits is so appealing and necessary, IMHO.

32 posted on 06/21/2002 7:40:52 PM PDT by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpo11
And shouldnt the President be investigated for possible cover-up?
33 posted on 06/21/2002 7:42:40 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
So far all we have is O'Reilly on this. I will wait and see where we go from here. Somehow I can't see President Bush caving to blackmail. I can however, see him want to save his first two years in office from being sucked up by more Clinton all the time.
34 posted on 06/21/2002 7:44:20 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryM
"Notice how Bush caved into these threats."

Notice how quickly you believed such a thing happened.

I mean, think about it....President Bush is sworn in and according to this, the leadership of the DNC goes to him and basically threatens him. Somehow, I can't imagine how a Daschle, Gehbardt, or even Terry McAuliffe could get to Bush for these clandestine meetings without the media picking up on at least a sniff of covert coercion, and threats to the presidency. This doesn't pass the "make sense" test.

What does make sense, maddening but logical sense, is that President Bush didn't need to be coerced. Remember his campaign pledge not to play the politics of personal destruction? Remember that during all the Clinton scandals, Governor and then candidate Bush never never involved himself in the Washington scene. He never commented, criticized, or interjected himself into any of it, except to pledge to restore honor and integrity to the White House, which he has done.

What I can easily believe is that President Bush and Ashcroft decided that the prosecution of Bill Clinton would not become a detrimental part of this administration, that they would not "go after" him, that President Bush's agenda was more important than Bill Clinton.

As much as I wanted to see Bill Clinton get more than a slap on the wrist, a piddling fine, impeachment, and disbarrment, as much as I longed for revenge worthy of 8 years, I believe President Bush made a personal committment to put the good of the country over the satisfaction of making Bill and Hillary Clinton pay for their personal corruption.

I'm a mean spirited bitch,who would have spent the rest of my life going after Bill Clinton, Hillary,Al Gore, James Carville, especially the democrats in congress, and all the Clinton enablers who didn't have the patriotism to acknowledge and eliminate Clintons' corruption, which infected all branches of government, the Justice Dept, INS, IRS, CIA, FBI, the military. But you know what? I'm glad President Bush is a better man than me.

35 posted on 06/21/2002 7:45:53 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Torie; Miss Marple
All roads lead to Kristol.
******

LOL.... No all roads lead to the NWO and Burger Builders and they must have their investments protected at all cost. No pipelines through Afghanistan, Russian oil, China goods, NAFTA, etc. Kristol is the delivery vehicle for the messages.... stay turned for the next "highly placed sourced" leak.
36 posted on 06/21/2002 7:46:47 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
O'Reilly and an anonymous person who claims to be an "insider" ...... really reliable source he has there.
37 posted on 06/21/2002 7:46:57 PM PDT by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123; thinden; OKCSubmariner; mancini; Sal; rdavis84; Uncle Bill
"The Democratic leadership made it quite clear to Mr. Bush that he would not get any cooperation - zero - on the part of the Democrats in the Senate and in the House if he pursued any kind of a criminal investigation against Bill Clinton."

Such a simple answer to such a corrupt cabal.

Don't take it personally YaYa, but that's how I see it.

38 posted on 06/21/2002 7:54:12 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kayak
"Notice how Bush caved into these threats."

It's amazing how people are so quick to believe those "anonymous" sources. Could be that O'Reilly was just set up. The Demos would love the turn teh Base against Bush at any cost.

39 posted on 06/21/2002 7:59:13 PM PDT by gramho12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
"No comment, just wondered why this hasn't Shown up before?"

Because O'Reilly is full of himself. Who is this high level source? Carl Rove? Rove would lie and sell his grandmother for politics. I think O'Reilly should either come clean or shut up. This mounts to blackmailing a sitting President. I got a feeling this is total bull or is that bill. AAH, it doesn't matter it means the same! HOGWASH!

40 posted on 06/21/2002 7:59:39 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson