Bush Administration Lawyers Defending Hillary - Gratis

NewsMax ^ | 2/21/02 | Limbacher

[honway]

My eyes are opening, thanks for the flag.

[Tumbleweed_Connection]

It's hard to believe Bush would pay to protect Hillary from JW. Why can't she? What is to be exposed? What isn't being said by Limbacher that he would intentionally spin?

[DoughtyOne]

Not sure I understand your comment here.

[Howlin]

I don't see ANY facts here regarding why they chose to do this; once I see them, maybe I'll be upset.

I just looked for ANY story about this on the wires and it's not there.

I am then left to presume NewsMax got this from JW; if you don't mind, I'd like to hear this from a NEWS SOURCE before I go crazy since Larry's releases tend to be unreliable and one-sided.

[Tumbleweed_Connection]

Looking for a legal opinion for the mess.

[Howlin]

What isn't being said by Limbacher that he would intentionally spin?

Perhaps he doesn't know anymore? Perhaps he's reading off the JW talking points?

BTW, is he saying that JW objected to the DOJ getting into this case?

Read this article again; and read it looking for the "other side." There ain't one in this article.

[stlrocket]

Matamoros has some great shots he posted on StrangeCosmos.com .

HILLARY

He does some very clever stuff

[M. Thatcher]

Howlin is right; there is the inevitable NewsMax hyperventilating and paucity of actual data. I would hope one would obtain a bit of context before Bush is damned to hell. Facts first, damnation later please.

[DoughtyOne]

I think your arguement is sound. But I'm not inclined to agree with you. I waited eight years to get some justice. When it comes to Mrs. Twit, I don't afford her one ounce of Executive Privilege. I may be proven wrong later, but my first impression is that I have reason to be pi--ed over this.

[RJCogburn]

Judical Watch? Surely you're kidding.

So is it about JW, or about the facts of the matter? Would you have a different opinion if it were some other group?

[jungleboy]

Howlin's waiting for CNN...the bearers of TRUTH...

[DoughtyOne]

You two do make an interesting point along the same line as Howlin. But I'm a lot less willing to think that there could be a reason to defend someone wasn't elected to office in the circumstances regarding Hall's complaint. You may wish to look at my response # 29. If I have to take my lumps later on for this snap judgement, you can lay it on thick.

[doug from upland]

This is really disgusting.

[Howlin]

I'm waiting for a STORY about it, not a press release with Larry Klayman's opinions in it.

[WillaJohns]

Those of you who voted for this man have my deepest sympathy.

Now you've got me curious. Who did you vote for?

[dighton]

Ping for Judicial Watch via NewsMax.

[Howlin]

Where does it say EP? Where does it say ANYTHING other than what Larry Klayman thinks?

And we should take Larry Klayman's views and opinions on the law because of what?

[mombonn]

Would you have a different opinion if it were some other group?

JW makes ambulance chasers look reputable. Larry has a real grudge against Bush - next he'll probably cite the President for littering.

[RLK]

We need a legal opinion, why spend our tax dollars to defend her?

------------------

We don't need a legal opinion. We need a president with maturity and a brain.

This woman is the most corrupt and dangerous political presence in America, along with her husband. Between them they are taking the country for $20,000,000 in book deals alone. I'm absolutely disgusted. This is betrayal of the American people and any semblence of integrity, morality, and justice.