Replies

I don't see ANY facts here regarding why they chose to do this; once I see them, maybe I'll be upset.

I just looked for ANY story about this on the wires and it's not there.

I am then left to presume NewsMax got this from JW; if you don't mind, I'd like to hear this from a NEWS SOURCE before I go crazy since Larry's releases tend to be unreliable and one-sided.

I think your arguement is sound. But I'm not inclined to agree with you. I waited eight years to get some justice. When it comes to Mrs. Twit, I don't afford her one ounce of Executive Privilege. I may be proven wrong later, but my first impression is that I have reason to be pi--ed over this.

I don't see ANY facts here regarding why they chose to do this; once I see them, maybe I'll be upset.
I just looked for ANY story about this on the wires and it's not there.
I am then left to presume NewsMax got this from JW; if you don't mind, I'd like to hear this from a NEWS SOURCE before I go crazy since Larry's releases tend to be unreliable and one-sided.

I'm sorry to join the thread so late.

Let's see, you have NewsMax, the "National Enquirer" of the right joined up with Larry Klayman, who never met a chance for a press release he didn't like.

With all that, who needs facts? Who needs corroboration? Who even cares if it's remotely true? Sounds like a sure-fire recipe for the "Bush-bashers" to come out in force. Unfortunately, they'll be joined by the dull-witted members of this forum who will believe ANYTHING they read without giving it a second thought.

Your plea for reason and clear thinking will be ignored and stomped on, as the hysteria runs wild.

Those of us that have been here for a while can just shake our heads and wonder what happened to our forum.