Skip to comments.
Bush Administration Lawyers Defending Hillary - Gratis
NewsMax ^
| 2/21/02
| Limbacher
Posted on 02/20/2002 4:21:45 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
If there ever was a vast right wing conspiracy, this much is now clear: it certainly never included President Bush - whose Justice Department is now defending New York Sen. Hillary Clinton in a lawsuit brought by Clinton White House whistleblower Sheryll Hall and Judicial Watch.
Over their objections, "the Bush Justice Department represents Hillary Clinton in this lawsuit free of charge, saying that it is in its 'discretion' to represent private parties," the legal watchdog group said in a press release Wednesday.
Hall was the White House computer expert who alleged that Mrs. Clinton was part of a conspiracy to force her out of her job after she told investigators about a data base compiled on the former first lady's instructions that illegally used White House social lists for Democratic Party fund-raising.
Hall also exposed the White House e-mail scandal, where millions of subpoenaed e-mails on some of the most serious Clinton scandals were withheld from investigators.
But despite her heroic efforts to expose Clinton White House wrongdoing, Justice Department lawyers were arguing against Hall yesterday - and instead for Hillary Clinton, a sight that was nearly too much to take for Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman.
"I had to shake my head in wonderment at the sight of the Bush Justice Department working hand in hand with the DNC to defend the Hillary Clinton-led conspiracy to use the White House computer systems for illegal fund-raising," he complained.
"Rather than improperly giving Hillary Clinton free legal representation in this private lawsuit, the Bush Justice Department ought to be prosecuting her for this illegal database and retaliation."
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushclinton; bushknew
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-310 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I guess I would have to know more about this but are they defending hillbilly or the Presidental White House.
2
posted on
02/20/2002 4:29:58 PM PST
by
esmith
To: esmith
I'm sure it is the white house they are defending but what it all boils down it is that they are defending evil. They need to get a clue.
3
posted on
02/20/2002 4:31:14 PM PST
by
Samizdat
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Damn Bush to hell for this.
4
posted on
02/20/2002 4:32:21 PM PST
by
RLK
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: Samizdat
I can't say I understand this.
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: ratcat
It is sad enough that Bush/Ashcroft dropped the campaign finance investigation...which means Chinagate....which means national security. It is further sad that they refuse to release information regarding the thinking that led J. Reno to not appoint an IC for this (and that they continue to coverup, it seems, the FBI's corruption in Boston).
So, why am I not surprised about this latest move?
9
posted on
02/20/2002 4:43:18 PM PST
by
RJCogburn
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
OY
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I think that I am going to cry.
11
posted on
02/20/2002 4:45:32 PM PST
by
mom-7
To: ratcat
We need a legal opinion, why spend our tax dollars to defend her?
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
UN
freepingbelievable.
--Boris
13
posted on
02/20/2002 4:46:47 PM PST
by
boris
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Those of you who voted for this man have my deepest sympathy. There are things I like about him and I'm more than willing to say so, but this is despicable.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
While Cheney makes his debut on the Leno Show tonight...perfect timing to support the polls of the President with the highest approval of any American President. Clinton/Clinton or Bush/Cheney...above the law.
15
posted on
02/20/2002 4:48:59 PM PST
by
Osinski
To: Samizdat
They need to get a clue.Judical Watch? Surely you're kidding.
The only thing they will GET is "get out a press release, asking for money."
16
posted on
02/20/2002 4:49:30 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: mom-7
I think that I am going to cry vomit.
To: DoughtyOne
Where's the damn attorney?
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Perhaps if NewsMax EVER included any facts with their articles, we'd know why.
19
posted on
02/20/2002 4:51:08 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Howlin, bud, Klayman is the only thing you see wrong here?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-310 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson