Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
Judical Watch? Surely you're kidding.

So is it about JW, or about the facts of the matter? Would you have a different opinion if it were some other group?

30 posted on 02/20/2002 5:02:48 PM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: RJCogburn
Would you have a different opinion if it were some other group?

JW makes ambulance chasers look reputable. Larry has a real grudge against Bush - next he'll probably cite the President for littering.

39 posted on 02/20/2002 5:08:23 PM PST by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: RJCogburn
Of course it's about Judicial Watch. Isn't Judicial Watch the ONLY entity that reports about Judicial Watch and what Larry Klayman thinks about the law?

Look at this article again. It's ALL one-sided.

Now go find this on the national news wires.

Perhaps NewsMax should do a little DIGGING and come up with the rest of the story, rather than reword articles from other sources.

42 posted on 02/20/2002 5:10:22 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson