Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/18/2002 6:17:19 AM PST by newsperson999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: newsperson999
Is that not illegal?
2 posted on 02/18/2002 6:21:03 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
Now they are saying that he is charged with "stealing an explosive" and some type of package has been found. He was caught at the screening area.
4 posted on 02/18/2002 6:21:50 AM PST by newsperson999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
Please keep us informed!
5 posted on 02/18/2002 6:22:02 AM PST by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
Wasn't it at LAX last week that they let a guy walk through after finding explosives residue on his shoes--and he got away? Wonder if this is the same guy?
7 posted on 02/18/2002 6:22:21 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
Now first off, let me say that its a given that criminals are not the sharpest knives in the drawer.

That being said, let me ask:

Who in the name of Holy Moly would ever try to smuggle explosives through the one place in the entire country where they are actively looking for people smuggling explosives?!?

That's about as bright as trying to bring a pickup truck load of cocaine over the border from Mexico in the back of an open pickup truck, and driving right into the customs check point at the border, parking, and waiting for them to inspect your vehicle. Duh!

12 posted on 02/18/2002 6:25:59 AM PST by Lumberjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
Post updates...thnx
30 posted on 02/18/2002 6:37:49 AM PST by Lady GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999

Man arrested at LAX with inert explosive device

Monday, February 18, 2002
©2002 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/02/18/state1038EST0040.DTL

(02-18) 07:38 PST LOS ANGELES (AP) -- An inactive Army National Guardsmen was arrested early Monday morning at Los Angeles International Airport after tying to pass an inert military explosive through security, police said.

The man was arrested about 6:10 a.m. and the incident forced the bomb squad to be called out.

34 posted on 02/18/2002 6:41:08 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
smoker
38 posted on 02/18/2002 6:44:45 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999

40 posted on 02/18/2002 6:45:01 AM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999

Man arrested at LAX with inert explosive device

Monday, February 18, 2002
©2002 Associated Press

URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/02/18/state1038EST0040.DTL

(02-18) 07:53 PST LOS ANGELES (AP) -- An inactive Army National Guardsmen was arrested early Monday morning at Los Angeles International Airport after tying to pass an inert military explosive through security, police said.

The man was arrested about 6:10 a.m. and the incident forced the bomb squad to be called out.

The man was placed under arrest for being in possession of an explosive device, said Officer Nadine Hernandez of the Los Angeles Police Department.

"The bomb squad had to respond to determine if the bomb was inert or not," Hernandez said.

The item resembled an M-80 firecracker and caused a screener to be concerned, said Sgt. Greg Glodery.

An official with the Federal Aviation Administration said the device was found in the man's carryon luggage.

No evacuations were ordered at Terminal 6, where the item was discovered, Glodery said. The terminal serves Continental Airlines and portions of the United Airlines fleet.

The screening station where the item was noticed in an x-ray machine was temporarily shutdown, Glodery said.

No flights were delayed, officials said.

A terminal at LAX was evacuated for an hour last Wednesday when a cylinder was found in a planter near a second-floor entrance. The plastic object turned out to be harmless and no flights were delayed.

The international terminal also was evacuated Dec. 25 after someone reported finding a "suspicious package" that turned out to be wrapped Christmas presents.

47 posted on 02/18/2002 6:58:44 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
Thought this was interesting:

This inert IED can be supplied separate from the attaché case (ITA-179-A). Thirty-three of these were purchased by Transport Canada in 1998 for use in their upgraded security training and test program in all Canadian airports, and are now the Canadian airport standard inert test IED set.

ITA-179-B is an inert military explosive demolition block, containing an inert electric detonator, electronic countdown timer and battery pack of 2 rechargeable "AA" 1.5 volt batteries with connecting wires.

The inert IED has been designed and x-ray tested by Transport Canada for accurate definition and excellent colour imaging on the latest x-ray luggage screening screening equipment. The inert gel simulant representing explosives has the correct density and other characteristics to represent live explosives on the x-ray monitor.

Here's a link: SecureSearch, Inc.

48 posted on 02/18/2002 6:59:00 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999

56 posted on 02/18/2002 7:07:23 AM PST by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
Fox now saying the national guardsman tried to pass through security a non-functioning explosive which resembles an M-80 firecracker . . . what a dork! Guess he thought the law against explosives didn't apply to himself--maybe that's why he's not active?
58 posted on 02/18/2002 7:13:28 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
WE NEED BOMB CONTROL, NOW!!!

Oh wait, we've already got it...

Silly me.

72 posted on 02/18/2002 8:10:39 AM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
I read it was a non functioning M80 firecracker. How does that get to be called a bomb? Maybe if it was C4?
80 posted on 02/18/2002 9:25:45 AM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
Question: Did they evacuate the airport like they did at (I believe SFO) last week?

Question: This guy was National Guard? I wonder how many more like him are floating around out there.

FWIW, either this guy was a complete and utter idiot, or he was a "self appointed " security screen tester. Perhaps he was hired by a media agency to try to get a story, or, even more scary, this is the best selfcheck the fedgov can come up with.

Question: Where the heck is Tom Ridge? I have not seen that guy more than one appearance since he was made "homeland security director". What is he doing? Is he actually acomplishing anything? And the BIG one: Was the anthrax a self inflicted injury by the DNC???. Funny how the distribution of that went.

Question: How many more times will the Sheeple heed the cry of "Alert, Alert" before it turns into a full blown wolfticket scenario. There are only 2 reasons for not releasing details about an alert of activity to the public (1.) Telling the public would cause more deaths than if they were kept ignorant (I call this the "gridlock nightmare scenario). or (2.) Telling the public would somehow reveal details of how the information was obtained (probably over their Official Maxwell Smart Shoe Phones (I call this one the "We really dont know a darn thing, we cant even figure out our job descriptions scenario) < /sarcasm>

Comments, as always are welcome. MAY GOD BLESS AND PROTECT THIS HONORABLE REPUBLIC

Greg

83 posted on 02/18/2002 9:45:55 AM PST by gwmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
First of all, you should never use LAX and evacuate in the same sentence, then you even write "explosives". This is politically uncorrect FR etiquette. Secondly, I have a question for you - If Los Angeles Airport is called LAX, what is Tampa's airport called?
87 posted on 02/18/2002 10:34:16 AM PST by M. Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
It was a noise maker. Nothing like a little panic to make life more interesting.
98 posted on 02/18/2002 11:37:21 AM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: newsperson999
at least he didn't have a box-cutter
102 posted on 02/18/2002 12:11:31 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson