Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Link to discussion of Commandments Monument with James Dobson, Judge Moore, and Alan Keyes
http://www.oneplace.com/Ministries/Focus_on_the_Family/ ^ | 8/25/03 | Hyacinth Bucket

Posted on 08/25/2003 6:54:55 PM PDT by Hyacinth Bucket

Here's a link to today's (Mon 8/25/03) broadcast of Focus on the Family with Dr. James Dobson.
Aired today but taped from yesterday. 30 minutes

http://www.oneplace.com/Ministries/Focus_on_the_Family/
or
http://www.family.org/

Guests: Judge Roy Moore and Alan Keyes
Hear from the Judge himself.

Topic: The constitutionality of displaying the 10 Commandments monument in the Alabama Judicial Center

This is a MUST HEAR. If you think you already know all about the nuances of this issue, listen anyway. It's one of the best programs I've heard Focus on the Family do in years. Both guests are very well-versed in the Constitution and the Law.


TOPICS: Activism; Apologetics; Current Events; General Discusssion; History; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Theology
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Hyacinth Bucket; TigersEye
Thank you, HB, for posting the link. I listened to parts of the program yesterday morning while at work - in and out of the truck delivering mail. Thanks for pinging me, Tiger.

Note to new visitors to the thread: in order to find the Justice Moore link one needs to click on "Broadcast Archives" and find the link for Monday, August 25th.

"What a judge says does not make law."

21 posted on 08/26/2003 1:25:29 AM PDT by .30Carbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Thanks. I had forgotten about that picture. Exactly.

There was a bit of making fun of Ashcroft over that, but no one contested the right to put up the statue.

It's just art.

So is the 10C monument.

22 posted on 08/26/2003 5:06:35 AM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hyacinth Bucket
Hello Hyacinth...and is your last name pronounced like "Bouquet"...:-)

Thanks for adding me to your PING list. I am honored. Also, I am encouraged that there are lurkers and new members out there reading and following some of the many debates and challenges and witnessing we are trying to do here on FR.

Welcome...and count me as one of your new friends if you like!

PS - my wife is a BIG Keeping Up Appearances fan...

23 posted on 08/26/2003 8:15:39 AM PDT by NewLand (The truth can't be ignored...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NewLand; .30Carbine
Thanks Friends!
24 posted on 08/26/2003 10:22:21 AM PDT by Hyacinth Bucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hyacinth Bucket
If I understand the commotion correctly, the ACLU lawyers said they feared displaying the Ten in the courthouse rotunda "MIGHT" make someone "feel" they would not get a fair trial - not that harm or injustice had yet been done to anyone. Is this right?

Since when do we take action because someone "MIGHT" feel anything? Don't plaintifs still bear a burden to prove harm or injury with willful or negligent intent?

Is this a "pre-emptive" strike?
25 posted on 08/26/2003 1:33:33 PM PDT by azhenfud (For every government action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
ACLU and the like will say and give all kinds of reasoning for their actions and one of them might be what you just said. Bottomline is that they hate God and are in a rebellious relationship with Him and so they want to shake their fists at God and erase everything about Him in society.

I pity them because it is one thing to doubt God's existence and we all have done that but to completely deny the possibility without fully investigating the matter and then have an all out, fight with God is just unbelievably foolish.

But deep down, I think, they must know that He really does exist and that the Bible is Truth, but still pridefully decide to rebel.
26 posted on 08/26/2003 2:04:28 PM PDT by Hyacinth Bucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hyacinth Bucket
By the way, is it pronounced (buk'it) or (boo ka'). ;^)
27 posted on 08/27/2003 2:39:12 PM PDT by fightu4it (conquest by immigration and subversion spells the end of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Last time I checked, there is no reference to God in the Constitution (the legal basis for our laws), so our laws and not based on religion.

God is mentioned once in the Delcraation of Independence, together with the laws of Nature and "Nature's God," which is not the way Christians see God. There is also a reference to a "Creator" which can mean a lot of things. There is no reference to a bilibal deity, Jesus, or Savior.

Some Christian fundamentalists would love to se a theocracy in America, but that would clearly be contrary to our Founding Fathers' idea of what this country should be like: a place where human freedoms, including religion, are practiced freely -- not shoved down someone's throat! But even freeedom has limits. For, unlimited freeedom is anarchy and slavery to others. You do not have the freedom to invade my freedom!

Christian fundamentalists are wrong (as usual) in that they associate the Ten Commandments with Christianity, Judaism with Christianity. Christianity draws its roots from Judaism, as American society draws its roots from England and Europe, but Christianity is not Judaism, nor is America England.

What defines Christianity is Jesus Christ, and the Christian Bible, the Gospels and letters of Paul. Take out Jesus or the Gospels and you have no Christianity.

Surely, the Ten Commandments are a worthy set of rules that, if obided by, would make the world a lot nicer -- but they are not the way to Christian salvation. The entire purpose of Chirstianity is salvation, and the only way to salvation is to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ, not other religions (and every practicing Jew will tell you that Christianity is another theology).

There are no Ten Commandments in the Mycenae Creed (4th century AD), that defines Chritian faith. So, what is this fuss all about?

It's about the fact that Ten Commandments define one and are associated with another specific relgion -- Judaism and Christianity. Their display suggests to anyone with more than a single digit IQ that it is an endorsement of specific religion(s) and is not some faith-nutral monument to the Creator. And that is just plain wrong. And so is swearing by the Bible, because what good does it do if an atheist or a non-Christian swears to it? There is a diference betwen the Ten Commandments (Judaism directly, Christianity indirectly) and a generic reference to God. Obviously one of nine Alabama's Chief Justices can't see the difference -- and neither can uncounted Evangelical fundamentalists who instead of seeing the Light are blinded by it.

28 posted on 08/27/2003 6:04:49 PM PDT by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
". . . a place where human freedoms, including religion, are practiced freely -- not shoved down someone's throat!"

Yeah. As if a slab of rock with the Ten Commandments inscribed upon it is shoving itself down people's throat. You err in asserting there is no connection between Christianity, Judaism, and the Ten Commandments:

"Christian fundamentalists are wrong (as usual) in that they associate the Ten Commandments with Christianity . . ."

Christ Himself said He came to fulfill the Law and not abolish it. Sure, there may be some folks who are out to establish an unconstitutional theocracy, but simple displays of the Ten Commandments are hardly going to get them there. Besides, even you yourself have said the Faith is not about the Ten Commandments. If anything, they are a salutary reminder to us all, no matter what faith we might practice.

Cry me a river, all you folks who are so chickenshit about displays of the simple truths spelled out in the Decalog.

29 posted on 08/27/2003 7:39:53 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (No gods were harmed in the making of this tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hyacinth Bucket
You are correct, and to elaborate one does not have to swear at all...we are now able to just AFFIRM our answer, on our own merit.
30 posted on 08/28/2003 8:22:23 AM PDT by MarthaNOStewart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
Your argument is very flawed, and I hope this will help.

First of all, the God of Judaism and God of Christianity are one in the same, the only difference is Jews did not accept God's son Jesus as the Messiah, so they do not believe in New Testament. It is the God of both who is on our original documents in America, and it is the same God we refer to in our currency, and our forefathers worshipped. Those who claim the founders of this nation to NOT be christians have trouble reading, and refuse very stubbornly to accept the truth, because they belong to the Father of LIES. "Satan comes as an angel of Light", so NO Thanks to your useless explanation, or seeing your so called "light"".

Might want to check the digits on your IQ!
31 posted on 08/28/2003 8:31:46 AM PDT by MarthaNOStewart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Look genius, the Constitution is the basis of our legal system. It has not a single reference to God. Our government and our laws do not acknowledge or endorse any religion. It is therefore improper to display symbols that represent one specific religion in a palace of justice, such as the Supreme Court.

Fortunately, we have people who sit in the most supreme positions who can use reason and not emotion, and thanks to them, we are a free and just Nation. People like Justice Moore and his fundamentalist “Christians” are just the kind of people who would do everything to turn this country into a blind theocracy.

The Fathers of our Nation were wise not to involve religion, knowing all too well that religions are exlusionary, divisive and ultimately contrary to our ideal of a multicultural melting pot. Belief in God is a personal matter, and it should remian just that. Freedom of religious expression means that no one will burn at a stake for worshiping a particular god. Justice should not care less if there is one or many gods. Justice should be concerned with human misdeeds, not divine matters.

32 posted on 08/28/2003 1:52:56 PM PDT by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
"Look genius."

Your acknowledgement of my intellectual superiority is appreciated. My I give due recognition to your ignorance in asserting the Constitution of our land was written in a moral vaccuum without any regard to "God" whatsoever?

CAUTION: A copy of the Ten Commandments may appear in a legal setting near you. In fact, there might be one hiding in the bushes outside. Sorry. Your fearmongering and whining about potential theocracies carries no weight with me or the better part of mankind.

33 posted on 08/28/2003 2:12:00 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MarthaNOStewart
I feel for you. If you consider yourself a Christian, you need to seek some help, for you have missed the very essence of what you consider is your religion.

Christianity, Judaism and Islam all contend there is one God, but their cognizance of God differs to the point of exclusion. To you, "the God of Judaism and God of Christianity are one in the same, the only difference is Jews did not accept God's son Jesus as the Messiah."

Maybe you ned to consult some practicing Jews and ask them how come Judaism considers Christianity a different theology, that is why do they consider Christianity incompatible with being Jewish?

Maybe you can increase your IQ score a bit by reading about Christianity as well. Christian God is triune, one essence, three personas, nothing less. To make a statement such as the one you did tells me that you must be one of those heretic protestant "Christians" who make up a "religion" as they go along, and someone who knows not even the essentials of Christianity.

Your second "pearl" is: "Those who claim the founders of this nation to NOT be christians have trouble reading..."

Reading what? Our founding Fathers were wise men who made sure not to mix religion and politics (theocracy), knowing all too well that religions divide, exclude and in general do contrary to the spirit of the American melting pot. Our Founding Fathers were decent people who were not interested in forcing their Christian faith onto others. The God on coins appeared much after them and on $ bills in 1956! Read your history!

They were also decent enough to know that decent people keep their religion as their private relationship with God, and that the idea of Christian faith is not to drum up your convictions and shove your faith down everyones throats -- but to do everything that will make you a better human being and hope that your miserable soul will be saved. There is no other concern of Christianity then the salvation. The fact that various schismatic and heretic braches of Christianity have used it as a "sword" to enhance thier political standing or to conquer other people is a sad legacy to human nature that has proven itself to have fallen from God.

34 posted on 08/28/2003 2:22:54 PM PDT by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
READ the Constitution and find GOD! Otherwise, go away.
35 posted on 08/28/2003 2:24:03 PM PDT by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
"READ the Constitution and find GOD! Otherwise, go away."

Wow. Your very own commandments. My conscience is stung.

Think I'll stick around a little while, though. As for the Ten Commandments, they've been around slightly longer than the Constitution, they're considerably better, and they'll last much longer, too.

36 posted on 08/28/2003 2:36:56 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
The documents are on the Yale Law University Website from our founding fathers, you go get the education...its there, you just are not willing to acknowledge truth.
It doesn't take a lot of babble to establish truth.
Much speaking, and lengthy replies do not make you intelligent, only windy.
Have a nice day!
37 posted on 08/28/2003 7:28:29 PM PDT by MarthaNOStewart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
The Constitution is NOT THE BASIS of our legal system, it is the result of it. The Bill of Rights (First 10 Amendments) were written by James Madison and ratified by Congress. It was in 1600's when our legal system began, and not at signing of Declaration of Independence, nor at the time the Constitution, or Bill of Rights were ratified.
You weren't born at 5 or 10 years old, and neither was America begun at time of Constitution.
38 posted on 08/28/2003 7:34:08 PM PDT by MarthaNOStewart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MarthaNOStewart
The Constitution is NOT THE BASIS of our legal system

That's a new one. The basis of our legal system is our Consitution. Please take your own advice -- and get some education. As for your inability to think rationally, no education may help.

39 posted on 08/28/2003 8:57:29 PM PDT by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
Still waiting...what's the matter...can't find God in the Constitution, so you try to wiggle out? Pathetic.
40 posted on 08/28/2003 8:59:31 PM PDT by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson