Have no fear. The walls of my la-BOR-a-tory are several feet thick. Our leader is safe.
Posted on 03/13/2002 4:47:26 AM PST by JediGirl
As I said it is not paranoia to point out inconsistencies or strange things. You have now confirmed that it was strange to answer that question, but you have not adequately answered why specifically you answered a post meant for No-Kin. Your excuse is that you were confused and further make the ludicrous point that ripping the guts out of a statement and changing its meaning is nothing.
My post was to No-Kin explaining why he was involved. It was your paranoia which focused on the misrepresentation reference in the post to him which apparently caused your confusion.
Your excuse is that you were confused and further make the ludicrous point that ripping the guts out of a statement and changing its meaning is nothing.
"I was confused," passive voice, as in "Mistakes were made?"
No-Kin's original and Junior's ellipsized version diligently compared, I find no distortion in the compacting.
He's melting away.
I remember that post!! One of the funniest FR moments in recent history. I subsequently posted a reponse to him (can't remember if it was on the original post or on his vanity about conspiracy on FR unmasked) and finished my post with pigdog's tagline: LITTLE WILLIE IS THE WORST AMERICAN PRESIDENT IN HISTORY!
AAPatriot foamed so much that MY monitor got soggy.
And I laughed and I laughed and I laughed...
Pure genius on your part Mr. Henry. A nostalgic doff of the hat to you, Sir.
ARRRRRRRRRGHHHHHH! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! NOT THAAAAAAAAAAT!!!!
Somehow, I cannot picture you as having the patience to sit on PH's head all day eating popcorn.
A series of convenient coincidences have occurred on this thread. It started with a reference by Vade to a statement made sometime ago by jennyp that it was very possible for an evolutionist to pose as a creationist and not be detected, but that the reverse was not possible. I pointed out that was most likely because some Darwinists were practiced at misrepresentation. Lo and behold shortly thereafter No-Kin, purported to be a creationist, arrives on scene to take up a VadeRetro challenge to put on the evolution hat. While that is occurring there are postings arguing over misrepresentations involved in replica skulls, teeth, and various other things. As No-kin posts in his preparation to become another, he makes a statement which is gutted by Junior and the meaning is completely changed(Vade is still blind to this misrepresentation). I point that out as an example of further misrepresentation. At some point, No-Kin answers me by telling me he does not need my help, which I have not offered and used him only because to me it was a perfect example of misrepresentation. In the answer he mysteriously invokes a game and point metaphor, a prime VadeRetro tactic. I reply to No-Kin stating it is not a game to me and further that I did not select him to help him. The very next post was Vade answering my post to No-Kin. That and a few other things yet to be mentioned, convince me that No-Kin is a plant. The mention by jennyp of a potentiality does not make it an event, yet the act itself is counter to the guidelines for FreeRepublic.
Don't play games - Don't represent yourself as another person, create or use another screen name to avoid a revocation of posting privileges, misrepresent the site or your role in it, and don't misattribute a contribution you've made. (Parody exceptions would apply to the latter, of course, but it should be clear what you are doing.)
I am not convinced of the reality of an independant No-kin. I'm sorry this is all very fishy.
LOL, here's a life lesson for you: Out in the real world, if you find yourself sitting on a park bench downtown, and a homeless person starts talking gibberish at you, don't give them helpful eye contact, let alone engage them in debate.
I would presume that there really is a poster named No-Kin-to-Monkeys, because he's posted on evolution threads before, some quite some time ago. If you think Vade is impersonating him, why don't you hit the abuse button and ask the moderator if someone else is posting as No-Kin?
Jenny, how many times do we have to tell you, stop hanging around Pioneer Square.
(Or, were you just taking a breather from the "mooning section" at "Doc Maynard's"?)
;-)
I want to completely clear the air on the record and say I am not now impersonating No-Kin-To-Monkeys.
Using the nuke option is a last resort. No-Kin had not posted in a week. He first appeared Apr 2, 2001. Peruse his posts on this thread and see if you can pick out the inconsistencies that I have. I assume No-Kin is he.
Have no fear. The walls of my la-BOR-a-tory are several feet thick. Our leader is safe.
LOL, Gibberish-in-your-face Central!
And Clinton argued over "is".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.