He's melting away.
A series of convenient coincidences have occurred on this thread. It started with a reference by Vade to a statement made sometime ago by jennyp that it was very possible for an evolutionist to pose as a creationist and not be detected, but that the reverse was not possible. I pointed out that was most likely because some Darwinists were practiced at misrepresentation. Lo and behold shortly thereafter No-Kin, purported to be a creationist, arrives on scene to take up a VadeRetro challenge to put on the evolution hat. While that is occurring there are postings arguing over misrepresentations involved in replica skulls, teeth, and various other things. As No-kin posts in his preparation to become another, he makes a statement which is gutted by Junior and the meaning is completely changed(Vade is still blind to this misrepresentation). I point that out as an example of further misrepresentation. At some point, No-Kin answers me by telling me he does not need my help, which I have not offered and used him only because to me it was a perfect example of misrepresentation. In the answer he mysteriously invokes a game and point metaphor, a prime VadeRetro tactic. I reply to No-Kin stating it is not a game to me and further that I did not select him to help him. The very next post was Vade answering my post to No-Kin. That and a few other things yet to be mentioned, convince me that No-Kin is a plant. The mention by jennyp of a potentiality does not make it an event, yet the act itself is counter to the guidelines for FreeRepublic.
Don't play games - Don't represent yourself as another person, create or use another screen name to avoid a revocation of posting privileges, misrepresent the site or your role in it, and don't misattribute a contribution you've made. (Parody exceptions would apply to the latter, of course, but it should be clear what you are doing.)
I am not convinced of the reality of an independant No-kin. I'm sorry this is all very fishy.