Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian
I've been posting pretty regularly on this thread,

A series of convenient coincidences have occurred on this thread. It started with a reference by Vade to a statement made sometime ago by jennyp that it was very possible for an evolutionist to pose as a creationist and not be detected, but that the reverse was not possible. I pointed out that was most likely because some Darwinists were practiced at misrepresentation. Lo and behold shortly thereafter No-Kin, purported to be a creationist, arrives on scene to take up a VadeRetro challenge to put on the evolution hat. While that is occurring there are postings arguing over misrepresentations involved in replica skulls, teeth, and various other things. As No-kin posts in his preparation to become another, he makes a statement which is gutted by Junior and the meaning is completely changed(Vade is still blind to this misrepresentation). I point that out as an example of further misrepresentation. At some point, No-Kin answers me by telling me he does not need my help, which I have not offered and used him only because to me it was a perfect example of misrepresentation. In the answer he mysteriously invokes a game and point metaphor, a prime VadeRetro tactic. I reply to No-Kin stating it is not a game to me and further that I did not select him to help him. The very next post was Vade answering my post to No-Kin. That and a few other things yet to be mentioned, convince me that No-Kin is a plant. The mention by jennyp of a potentiality does not make it an event, yet the act itself is counter to the guidelines for FreeRepublic.

Don't play games - Don't represent yourself as another person, create or use another screen name to avoid a revocation of posting privileges, misrepresent the site or your role in it, and don't misattribute a contribution you've made. (Parody exceptions would apply to the latter, of course, but it should be clear what you are doing.)

I am not convinced of the reality of an independant No-kin. I'm sorry this is all very fishy.

2,131 posted on 03/26/2002 2:50:56 PM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2124 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
I'm going out to dinner. I'll be back as Ingrid Bergmann in Casablanca.
2,133 posted on 03/26/2002 2:55:10 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2131 | View Replies ]

To: AndrewC
I am not convinced of the reality of an independant No-kin. I'm sorry this is all very fishy.

I would presume that there really is a poster named No-Kin-to-Monkeys, because he's posted on evolution threads before, some quite some time ago. If you think Vade is impersonating him, why don't you hit the abuse button and ask the moderator if someone else is posting as No-Kin?

2,134 posted on 03/26/2002 2:57:50 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2131 | View Replies ]

To: AndrewC
It started with a reference by Vade to a statement made sometime ago by jennyp that it was very possible for an evolutionist to pose as a creationist and not be detected, but that the reverse was not possible. I pointed out that was most likely because some Darwinists were practiced at misrepresentation. Lo and behold shortly thereafter No-Kin, purported to be a creationist, arrives on scene to take up a VadeRetro challenge to put on the evolution hat.

I want to completely clear the air on the record and say I am not now impersonating No-Kin-To-Monkeys.

2,136 posted on 03/26/2002 3:03:58 PM PST by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson