[jennyp]

It started with a reference by Vade to a statement made sometime ago by jennyp that it was very possible for an evolutionist to pose as a creationist and not be detected, but that the reverse was not possible. I pointed out that was most likely because some Darwinists were practiced at misrepresentation. Lo and behold shortly thereafter No-Kin, purported to be a creationist, arrives on scene to take up a VadeRetro challenge to put on the evolution hat.

I want to completely clear the air on the record and say I am not now impersonating No-Kin-To-Monkeys.

[AndrewC]

I am not now impersonating No-Kin-To-Monkeys.

And Clinton argued over "is".

[VadeRetro]

Oh! "Not now," huh? I see. And what exactly do you mean by that?

[Clacking of ball bearings]