Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/26/2026 2:59:34 PM PDT by ebb tide
A survey commissioned by the University of Notre Dame’s McGrath Institute for Church Life found that an alarming number of U.S. bishops are “comfortable ordaining a man who experiences deep-seated same-sex attraction.”
The survey was originally published in 2025 and came to light this week in a report titled Do You Know Them to be Worthy? Twelve Proposals for Bishops, Rectors, Seminary Formation Teams, and Mental Health Professionals in Assessing the Suitability of Men for Holy Orders by Rev. Thomas V. Berg, a former formator at St. Joseph’s Seminary in Dunwoodie, New York; and Professor Timothy G. Lock, a licensed psychiatrist and director of psychological services also at St. Joseph’s Seminary.
The survey found that 22% of U.S. bishops surveyed agree that they are “comfortable ordaining a man who experiences deep-seated same-sex attraction, provided he is firmly committed to celibacy.” More troublingly, a whopping 10% of U.S. bishops said they “strongly agree” with that statement.
The nation’s bishops are far more likely than others whose job it is to evaluate the suitability of candidates for the priesthood to be accepting of “deep-seated same-sex attraction.”
At 22%, the bishops are twice as likely as vocation directors (9%) and seminary spiritual directors/formators (12%) to support the ordination of men with deep-seated same-sex attraction (SSA), while seminary rectors (16%) and seminary mental health professionals (17%) are also more skeptical about advancing such candidates.
“The present authors, while endorsing that position, also recognize that there exists often sharp disagreement on this issue among key constituencies who play a role in judging the suitability of such candidates,” Berg and Lock noted.
“While the data indicates that a majority of bishops are not comfortable ordaining these men, there remains nonetheless a notable disparity of judgment in the body of bishops,” they continued.
“Many of us who have worked in formation for many years can attest to instances in which undue pressure has been placed on a rector and members of the formation team to advance such candidates against their own judgment,” they warned.
The U.S. bishops’ acceptance of homosexual tendencies contrasts with the Vatican’s 2005 document declaring that the Church cannot admit men with “deep-seated homosexual tendencies” to seminaries and the priesthood.
The Church further teaches that the homosexual inclination is “objectively disordered” and “incompatible with the priesthood."
As such, they align themselves with Fr. James Martin, who took advantage of the publication of the survey and the recommendations issued by Berg and Lock to again push for ordaining homosexual men as priests.
In a scandalous commentary penned for the website Outreach, which bills itself as a so-called “LGBTQ Catholic ministry” and which Martin founded, the Jesuit took issue with two of the 12 proposals by authors Berg and Lock.
The term “overcoming” homosexuality is worrisome to Martin. “It is one thing to overcome temptation or lust; it is another to overcome one’s overall sexuality,” the Jesuit said, indicating that he believes that homosexual tendencies are an immutable trait and positive, though the Church teaches that they are disordered.
“This could easily be misinterpreted as overcoming one’s sexuality overall, a dangerous proposal,” Martin claimed.
He further lamented that the heart of the authors’ approach is “a view of homosexuality as an immense barrier to living a healthy life as a priest.”
“In my almost 40 years as a Jesuit, I’ve known dozens of celibate gay priests who have led what Pope Francis called ‘good, holy and celibate’ lives, modeling Jesus’ message of love and mercy,” Martin wrote. “They have been for me, and for many of my friends, spiritual directors, pastors, professors and mentors.”
Martin related an anecdote:
A few years ago, I asked a U.S. seminarian studying in Rome how many of his fellow seminarians were gay. “Half of them,” he said without hesitation. How many were open about their sexuality with their spiritual directors or seminary rectors? “Are you kidding?” he said. “None of them.” He explained that would mean expulsion.
Contrary to Martin’s alleged experience, and at odds with the 22% of bishops who apparently share his views, U.S. priests ordained in recent years overwhelmingly identify as conservative, suggesting that homosexuals are not as high a percentage of current seminarians as he has suggested.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Ping
This is communism; they are communists.
No problem, if they actually keep the vows of celibacy. But has any priest in the last 1000 years actually kept those vows? And would any same-sex attracted person actually keep them?
Disgusting 🤢
It’s pretty safe to assume that over 1/5 of US bishops are homosexual.
Liberalism is amok in churches. Here the local SBC churches are now being infiltrated with CBF money and material.
They’ve been doing it all along.
How many billions did the church pay the last time?
The Roman Catholic Church has paid more than $5.5 billion in clerical sexual abuse settlements, legal fees, and victim support in the United States alone, while the total global payout has never been fully determined. There is a problem.
This is clearly true.
Sounds like they want more lawsuits.
Keep in mind that the percentage of homosexual priests /bishops is much higher in the age range of current bishops, than of the younger priest's. This likely explains the high percentage approving of this ( I would have honestly thought it would be much higher). Supposedly about 20% of older priests have SSA, while only 3% under 50 have SSA (hard to tell how accurate these figures are though as the younger priest would have to lie about it to continue in most seminaries).
It's obviously a tough thing to study. Various research methods guesstimated that 80% to 50% of Catholic priests keep their celibacy vows.
But it's still a problem even if they do keep their vows. SSA is a disorder involving a very deep personal issue of the priest's and in the past the priesthood was used to hide it. The thinking being that "if I can't get married I'll become a priest."
It has led to multiple problems ( see the John Jay report), and if allowed to grow creates a culture that protects itself and looks out for those with the same disorder. This culture also repulses men who might otherwise be discerning if they are called to the priesthood.
I know both diocesan and traditional priests (where the number of same sex attracted priests, while not zero, is so low it is insignificant). It definitely makes a difference in the culture.
This is not meant to bash those that have to carry and deal with that cross- which is a heavier one than I have to carry. I hope and pray that they can answer God's call to sanctity. But history has shown that putting them into the priesthood causes immense problems and does them and the rest of us no favors.
that’s “one- in- five” bishops the Church can well do without, imho
can we take up a collection to send them Bibles?
That could also read "close to 80% of Bishops do not believe...", etc.
Either way, it suggests 20%+ of the church's leaders will have a chance to "influence" the children in the congregation.
And heretics.
Very.
Even one homosexual priest is too many.
Along with CCP and world enslavement forum cash.
Unfortunately.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.