Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear engineer says latest research confirms first-century date of Shroud of Turin
www.catholicnewsagency.com ^ | September 28, 2024 | By Martin Barillas

Posted on 01/10/2025 11:36:30 AM PST by Red Badger

Ann Arbor, Michigan, Sep 28, 2024 / 06:00 am

For centuries Christians have attributed a first-century date to the Shroud of Turin. Nuclear engineer Robert Rucker says that his latest research on the shroud verifies that.

“The Shroud of Turin is the second-most valuable possession of the human race next to the Bible itself,” Rucker told CNA. The shroud is currently preserved in the Chapel of the Holy Shroud adjacent to St. John the Baptist Cathedral in Turin (Torino), Italy.

For more than 10 years, Rucker has studied the physics of the disappearance of the body of Jesus and its imprint on the shroud. His website, Shroud Research, challenges conclusions that the shroud dates to the period of 1260 to 1380 A.D., leading skeptics to conclude it is a medieval fake.

A view of the 3D bronze corpus. Credit: Martin Barillas

In 1988, scientists used tiny samples snipped from the shroud to determine the amount of carbon 14 isotopes they contained, destroying the samples in the process. The radioactive carbon 14 isotope is a variant of carbon-containing excess neutrons, which are particles smaller than atoms. Over time, carbon 14 decays into nitrogen 14 in organic materials such as bone and plant matter. The ratio of carbon 14 atoms remaining in a sample provides the data needed to estimate the sample’s age.

Rucker said his calculations show that the 1988 carbon 14 dating is erroneous because it does not take into account the radiation emitted from Jesus’ body at the resurrection, which included neutrons that were absorbed by the shroud and formed new carbon 14 atoms, thus leading to a misinterpretation of the data.

“Carbon 14 dates can be vastly wrong if something has changed the ratio of c-14 to c-12 in the sample, other than the decay of the carbon 14,” Rucker explained. “There have been six different explanations for the carbon date of 1260-1380. The first explanation was in a letter to the editor of Nature magazine in 1989. Tom Philips, who holds a Ph.D. in particle physics, suggested to Nature that the most obvious explanation is that new carbon 14 atoms were produced by neutron absorption” in the shroud.

“That proposal,” Rucker said, “was never followed up on until I did the nuclear analysis computer calculations in 2014.”

Rucker will offer a workshop about his research on Oct. 6-7 at St. Thomas the Apostle Parish and the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan. He earned his bachelor’s and master’s degrees at the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor as well as professional engineering certificates in nuclear engineering and mechanical engineering.

Bolstering his credentials are 38 years of experience in the nuclear power industry, which called for making nuclear analysis computer calculations related to nuclear reactor design and statistical analysis of experimental data. He has been researching the shroud since 2013 and has conducted nuclear analysis computer calculations related to its date.

Paola Conti-Puorger, who holds a doctorate in aerospace engineering and a postgraduate degree in shroud studies from the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum in Rome, is a parishioner of St. Thomas and manages its permanent Othonia exhibit on the shroud, which includes a photographic reproduction, a 3D hologram, and a bronze likeness of Jesus lying in the tomb before his resurrection, as revealed by the imprint on the shroud.

Othonia is a research center based in Rome devoted to preserving, promoting, and disseminating knowledge about the shroud. It is part of the Science and Faith Institute within the Athenaeum.

“Rucker has studied the shroud for years and can offer an authoritative word about the scientific research on it,” she told CNA.

“The shroud is the very best news we can receive in this life: that our sins are forgiven, that we are loved, that we have an important dignity, that we are called to this image within ourselves, and that we are called to love with the same love. This is the truth and real happiness of humanity,” Conti-Puorger said.

“It is like contemplating the Gospel and seeing it very alive. Like the Eucharist, Christ’s body and blood are there. This is a living presence. It’s not a relic,” she said.

In 2015, Pope Francis prayed before the shroud and during an Angelus address said: “The shroud attracts [us] toward the martyred face and body of Jesus.”

He continued: “At the same time, it pushes [us] toward the face of every suffering and unjustly persecuted person. It pushes us in the same direction as the gift of Jesus’ love.”

Neither the pope nor his immediate predecessors have made any pronouncements on the authenticity of the shroud.

The shroud has been venerated for centuries in northern Italy where it was guarded by the powerful Savoy family. In 1983, ownership was granted to the pope. When it was exhibited in 1898, permission was granted for photography. It was shown to be a natural negative image and beyond the competence of a medieval forger.

In 1981, an international team of scientists with the Shroud of Turin Research Project determined that the image shows a “scourged, crucified man” not produced by an artist. They said it tested positive for blood. But how the image was produced is a problem that “remains unsolved.”

“The shroud came searching for us,” Conti-Puorger said. “It came to St. Thomas providentially, so I think it is the Lord himself who is calling people to come.”

“There are people searching for many things,” Father Bill Ashbaugh, pastor of St. Thomas the Apostle Parish, told CNA. “They often think that science contradicts faith. But it’s just the opposite. Science is a help to faith.”


TOPICS: Catholic; History; Judaism; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: orthodox; protestant; pseudononsense; shroud; shroudofturin; turin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2025 11:36:30 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; ebb tide

Ping!..................


2 posted on 01/10/2025 11:36:50 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Thought so
Glad we have it.


3 posted on 01/10/2025 11:42:27 AM PST by Texas_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Awesom3 story😇 The Father Himself told us not to have graven images or idols? Would this constitute a graven image or idol, or is there a scriptural message that shows us how to deal with this, if it is in fact the burial shroud of Christ?


4 posted on 01/10/2025 11:45:23 AM PST by Spacetrucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

In before the “I don’t need no shroud to believe in God” crowd. (even though no one has ever said they did)


5 posted on 01/10/2025 11:46:23 AM PST by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

And they never mention the fact that the sample they carbon dated was from a patch job that was done in the Middle Ages. The Shroud was linen, the patch job was dyed cotton that was French-rewoven onto the rest of The Shroud. But they never mention that part.


6 posted on 01/10/2025 11:47:53 AM PST by NurdlyPeon (It is the nature of liberals to pervert whatever they touch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spacetrucker

I’ve always taken that to mean “Don’t worship objects.”

Jeremiah 10 King James Version

10 Hear ye the word which the Lord speaketh unto you, O house of Israel:

2 Thus saith the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.

3 For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.

4 They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.

5 They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.

6 Forasmuch as there is none like unto thee, O Lord; thou art great, and thy name is great in might.


7 posted on 01/10/2025 11:48:28 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; Chode; Salamander; Carriage Hill; Lockbox; MtnClimber; nascarnation; Squantos; ...

Thank You for Posting This.

I don’t understand how so many people can try to say the Shroud is a huge scam.

My warning to them is: Get ready for the most intense ZOT the World has ever seen, heard, felt and possibly not survived. Getting “GROUNDED “ can be a real bitch !


8 posted on 01/10/2025 11:48:32 AM PST by mabarker1 ( (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spacetrucker
Awesom3 story😇 The Father Himself told us not to have graven images or idols? Would this constitute a graven image or idol, or is there a scriptural message that shows us how to deal with this, if it is in fact the burial shroud of Christ?

Well, it's not graven, and no one worships it as an idol, so that eliminates those worries.

9 posted on 01/10/2025 11:49:38 AM PST by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NurdlyPeon

I wasn’t aware of that. Thanks 🙏


10 posted on 01/10/2025 11:50:13 AM PST by mabarker1 ( (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fidelis

The first part of your statement makes perfect sense, as a burial shroud would not be graven. As for the second part, it would be difficult for anyone to state that no one worships it so it remains a matter to question.


11 posted on 01/10/2025 11:52:38 AM PST by Spacetrucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1

Amen...


12 posted on 01/10/2025 11:56:25 AM PST by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I can understand not worshiping objects, and none should do so; yet some people do. The scriptural quote seems a bit abstract in light of the subject we are discussing. I can extrapolate a reference applicable but it is not direct.


13 posted on 01/10/2025 11:56:31 AM PST by Spacetrucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Rucker said his calculations show that the 1988 carbon 14 dating is erroneous because it does not take into account the radiation emitted from Jesus’ body at the resurrection...

Soooo where did Mr. Rucker come up with a radiation burst coincident with the Resurrection?

14 posted on 01/10/2025 11:58:00 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NurdlyPeon

I spent three and a half days at a Shroud seminar and that was one of the things brought up.


15 posted on 01/10/2025 12:02:38 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Gamma Jesus?
Does Isaiah 50:6 apply?

I’m interested in the risen and returning Messiah, not an old trash bag


16 posted on 01/10/2025 12:04:58 PM PST by Karliner (Heb 4:12 Rom 8:28 Rev 3, "...This is the end of the beginning." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Because the image is burnt into the very top thread of the thread used to make the Shroud cloth. The rest of the thread is intact. The only way that the thread could have been burnt without the rest of the thread being burnt was because of a nanosecond burst of radiation from the body.


17 posted on 01/10/2025 12:06:17 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Nah. Fake science. What’s his nuclear background, running an x-ray machine?

https://medievalshroud.com/coincidence-or-correlation/

from his LinkedIn page:

Robert Rucker - Independant [sic] Research - Richland, WA... Independant [sic] Research


18 posted on 01/10/2025 12:07:47 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There is a computer-generated image of the Shroud in the Cathedral of St. Helen in Rome. I took a picture and it came out lousy and faint, like the one shown in this article. When you look at it with your eyes it is much more clear, sharp and detailed.


19 posted on 01/10/2025 12:15:10 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (Black guy upon receiving a MAGA hat: "MURICA!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Rucker said his calculations show that the 1988 carbon 14 dating is erroneous because it does not take into account the radiation emitted from Jesus’ body at the resurrection, which included neutrons that were absorbed by the shroud and formed new carbon 14 atoms, thus leading to a misinterpretation of the data.

I proposed this idea 30 years ago.

20 posted on 01/10/2025 12:20:15 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson