Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open Letter to Francis: Why Are You Destroying the Religion of the Saints?
The Remnant Newspaper ^ | November 1, 2023 | Robert Morrison

Posted on 11/02/2023 1:31:26 PM PDT by ebb tide

Open Letter to Francis: Why Are You Destroying the Religion of the Saints?

Dear Francis,

We write to you as fellow sinners, in great need of God’s mercy. In various ways — especially through your Synod on Synodality and persistent opposition to proselytism — you have asked Catholics to have respect for all baptized Christians and their particular religious beliefs. This openness to the religious beliefs of others encourages us to explain our religion to you.

We are Catholics who believe the same truths, and retain the same religious devotions, that all Catholics enjoyed prior to Vatican II. We often call ourselves Traditional Catholics, while others refer to us as rigid and backward.

 

As you know, prior to Vatican II many popes warned against Liberalism and Modernism because they sincerely believed that those ideas would harm Catholics. In general, they told us that “if you accept these errors, certain evil results will occur.” At Vatican II, John XXIII opened the door to ideas that had been condemned by his predecessors. Men like Yves Congar, Augustin Bea, and Henri de Lubac stepped in and persuaded the Council Fathers to accept the previously condemned ideas, many of which were disguised with ambiguity. What happened when Catholics accepted the errors the popes had warned about?

How can you be so very sure that God wills every religion in the world other than the Catholicism of your youth?

For over sixty years, we have seen a proliferation of all the evils in the Church about which the pre-Vatican II popes warned. Some people argue that these developments flow not from changes introduced at Vatican II but from broad societal change. This might be persuasive if it were not for the fact that those Catholics who retain the pre-Vatican II beliefs and practices have not experienced the same evils, at least not to the same extent. It is obvious that the pre-Vatican II popes were correct.

Certainly there are many nominal Catholics who want the Church to adopt the ideas that the popes had always condemned because they do not like what the Church has always said about non-Catholic religions and certain moral issues. But nobody is forced to be a Catholic. Those who do not want to accept what the Church has always taught could freely join one of the countless Protestant churches, or even form their own.

Going back to your opposition to proselytism, we can all understand your basic point, even though it conflicts with Our Lord’s call for us to teach the nations (Matthew 28:19-20). If you really believe that it is evil to try to change a single person’s religious beliefs through talking to them about Catholicism, how can you find it permissible to underhandedly change an entire religion from the inside, while telling believers that nothing has changed? Even a pagan or atheist would find such a devious project to be cruel and unjust, and yet is precisely what the innovators have done to Catholics. You also do this.

If we all need to stop eating meat to save the environment (because cow flatulence is so bad), what do they think nuclear bombs will do to the environment? These are the geniuses you would follow instead of the Church’s saints?

And here is another interesting thing about the Vatican II revolution. The ecumenical spirit obviously encourages all Christians to practice their chosen religion without being persecuted by Rome. You, as the man who represents himself to the world as the pope, would never think of condemning Baptists or Methodists, let alone shutting down their churches or persecuting them. Why, then, do you allow those in your hierarchy to do this to those Christians who happen to call themselves Traditional Catholic? Why, indeed, do you do these things to us?

You praised Blaise Pascal earlier this year and so surely you are familiar with his famous wager, in which he demonstrates how foolish it would be to act as though God did not exist. We can apply his same reasoning to the post-Vatican II ecumenism.

Suppose we all have to make a choice: you must either follow what the Church has always taught and be a Catholic, or else you can adopt any Christian set of beliefs (including Catholicism). If it is true that one must follow what the Church has alway taught to be saved, then those who do so will be saved, and those who follow non-Catholic religions will be lost. On the other hand, if all baptized souls can be saved by following any form of Christianity, then all baptized souls are saved regardless of which option they choose. Therefore, the only way you can be lost is by following a non-Catholic religion if, as the Church has always taught, there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church (absent the standard exceptions). Thus, the only logical choice is to follow what the Church has always taught.

We can apply this to you in two ways, both as a fellow sinner trying to make it to heaven, and in your capacity as the bishop dressed in white. As a fellow sinner, why would you bet your eternal salvation on the post-Vatican II ideas that have been so obviously disastrous? While you were in the seminary, you probably heard the grand forecasts that ecumenism would lead to unity and overflowing Catholic churches. Just the opposite happened — Catholics abandoned the Faith of their fathers in droves, filled with bitterness and sadness. All the prophets of change were wrong, and many were apparently malicious. Would you trust these fools with your eternal salvation?

May God grant you the grace you need to save your soul, honor God, and lead many souls to heaven. When He does give you the grace, accept it. Otherwise, we hope to never see the place that Satan has prepared for you.

But your situation is unique because you have taken such great responsibility upon your shoulders. It is bad enough that you will not choose to follow what the Church has always taught, but it is infinitely worse that you have occupied the papacy to prevent others from following the religion of all the saints. Indeed, you want to wipe that “rigid” and “backward” religion off the face of the earth, even though you would protect every other Christian religion. How can you be so very sure that God wills every religion in the world other than the Catholicism of your youth? All the saints would tell you that you have it exactly backwards.

Your occupation of the papacy exposes you to greater peril if you harm God’s Church and deprive Him of the love He wants to receive from souls. But it also allows you to do something heroic at this moment. You can choose between one of the lowest places in hell or a high place in heaven. Your role at this moment in salvation history therefore acts like a magnifier of the eternal consequences we all face. You can honor God and become a great saint if you reject the anti-Catholic spirit that has poisoned so many souls since Vatican II. With so many people praying for you, it seems that God will grant you the grace to do so.

But perhaps you would hesitate because so many “great people” support your efforts. Is it odd to you that many of your great friends who tell us to “trust the science” on the environment also tell us we are bigots if we say that men cannot become pregnant? And why are these great friends of yours pushing for World War III? If we all need to stop eating meat to save the environment (because cow flatulence is so bad), what do they think nuclear bombs will do to the environment? These are the geniuses you would follow instead of the Church’s saints?

You can be a great saint but you have to first be a great man, and you are running out of time. Many of us would offer our lives to help you convert, because we want to see you in heaven. May God grant you the grace you need to save your soul, honor God, and lead many souls to heaven. When He does give you the grace, accept it. Otherwise, we hope to never see the place that Satan has prepared for you. We pray that the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Undoer of Knots, intercedes on your behalf to obtain everything you need to choose heaven over hell. 

In Christo Rege,
Robert Morrison
Michael J. Matt | Editor, The Remnant



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: anticatholicposting; apostatepope; donatefreerepublic; frankenchurch; holyspiritselected; romancatholic; splintersectinrome; truechurch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 last
To: ebb tide
But I’m sure Bergoglio will agree with you that other “religions” are sufficient for salvation, whether they be christian or non-christian religions.

I think I recall Jesus saying something about this when HE was asked a certain question...

John 6:28-29

Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?”
Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”


Not Mary
Not the Pope
Not the Church
but...

161 posted on 11/06/2023 5:20:45 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Most of them need LOTS of them!!


162 posted on 11/06/2023 5:21:13 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
It’s you, who doesn’t know how to use them properly.

Oh; I see...


 


'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,
' it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.'

'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean so many different things.'

'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'  


163 posted on 11/06/2023 5:23:16 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
When have I rebelled against legitimate authority?

Call no man father.

164 posted on 11/06/2023 5:24:18 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Vatican[edit]

In Rome, Pope Pius XI strongly condemned the naturism movement throughout the early 1930s, calling it "paganly immodest".[12] This prompted the head of the New York Legion of Decency, former New York Catholic Governor and presidential candidate Alfred E. Smith, to try to outlaw all nudism. A recent court ruling had declared private social nudity to be legal per current law. Eventually, their efforts failed in the state legislature.[12] After Boone's passing in the late 1960s, the ASA became more secular, along with American society in general. In 1994, the ASA was renamed as the American Association for Nude Recreation (AANR), which has its headquarters in Florida.[13]

Pope John Paul II began his papacy in 1978, becoming the first non-Italian pope in four and a half centuries.[14] His views on naturism differed substantially from that of his predecessors. Authoring the book Love and Responsibility (1981),[15] he wrote: "Nakedness itself is not immodest [...] Immodesty is present only when nakedness plays a negative role with regard to the value of the person, when its aim is to arouse concupiscence, as a result of which the person is put in the position of an object for enjoyment".[16]

 

 

Christian naturism - Wikipedia

165 posted on 11/06/2023 5:37:54 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

I wonder...

...which pope is(was) right?


166 posted on 11/06/2023 5:38:38 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Drago

I was just a bit stumped by your continuing rejection of basic RC teaching on Papal Supremacy/infallibility.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You have a complete misunderstanding of the meaning and scope of Papal Supremacy and infallibility. Instead of displaying your ignorance regarding same, if you can read why don’t you make an effort to find reliable source materials so you don’t make statements that reveal such stupidity?


167 posted on 11/06/2023 4:56:12 PM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (Current POPE and POTUS: corrupt, ignorant, paranoid, angry, deeply hateful, and deeply despised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: fortes fortuna juvat

Wow, nice to meet you too! (Not). Instead of throwing out insults you sould throw out some info./links to support your opinion...here are some to get you started:

https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2020-07/primacy-and-infallibility-150-years-after-vatican-i.html

https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2020-07/pastor-aeternus-vatican-i-council-infallible-papal-magisterium.html (On all “matters of faith and morals” would include ceasefires and LGBT+++ issues, no?)

https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19981031_primato-successore-pietro_en.html

https://catholicoutlook.org/vatican-i-and-the-doctrine-of-papal-infallibility/
(Pope acting “ex cathedra”)

https://chrc-phila.org/papal-infallibility/

https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=4748

https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/answers/heresy-shism-and-apostasy-24761

“Fortuna est certior”


168 posted on 11/06/2023 6:52:19 PM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Drago

Drago me boy I’ve never known anyone more likely to experience the fires of Hell. And thumping that Bible of yours won’t make a bit of difference.


169 posted on 11/06/2023 7:41:06 PM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (Current POPE and POTUS: corrupt, ignorant, paranoid, angry, deeply hateful, and deeply despised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: fortes fortuna juvat

“Weak Sauce” my friend....post some supporting links/info. or it’s off to the confessional for your lack of Papal respect! :-0


170 posted on 11/06/2023 8:07:59 PM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Drago

“Weak Sauce” my friend....post some supporting links/info. or it’s off to the confessional for your lack of Papal respect!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I have the same respect for the dude who is currently soiling the Chair of Peter that I do for you, Drago, which isn’t a hell of a lot! Why? Well because for one thing, it’s obvious neither of you understand the differences between the Catholic faith, the Catholic Church, and the Catholic Church Episcopacy.


171 posted on 11/07/2023 10:03:21 PM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (Current POPE and POTUS: corrupt, ignorant, paranoid, angry, deeply hateful, and deeply despised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: fortes fortuna juvat

Ok, you’re the expert I guess, but perhaps you should try out an Orthodox Catholic church near you…it’s “the Roman Catholic church without the infallible all-powerful Pope” The concept that caused that whole 1054 “schism” thing in the first place and the thing that is causing a lot of Roman Catholic FReepers to risk heresy by doubting the legitimacy/infallibility of the current RC Pope. In any case, best of luck in ridding yourself of your not so welcome leader! ;-)

https://www.oca.org/parishes/state/SC

https://antiochian.org/parishes

https://easterndiocese.org

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East–West_Schism


172 posted on 11/07/2023 11:48:53 PM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Drago

For about six years while my father was in residence at the Home of the Little Sisters of the Poor in D.C., I attended the Divine Liturgy at the Ukrainian Catholic National Shrine of The Holy Family. For the last 35 years following a couple of decades as a lapsed RC, I have been devout member of the traditional Latin Mass community of the SSPX.

I have the utmost respect and admiration for the Orthodox Catholic Communion of Churches around the world, so the websites you’ve passed on to me are much appreciated. By the way, several years ago I spent time in prayer at the Cathedral of the Savior on Spilled Blood while in St. Petersburg, Russia.

https://ucns-holyfamily.org/index.php


173 posted on 11/08/2023 1:01:45 PM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (Current POPE and POTUS: corrupt, ignorant, paranoid, angry, deeply hateful, and deeply despised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: fortes fortuna juvat

Great to know that you have experienced other expressions of the Catholic tradition! I have some distant relatives (1800’s) of the Serbian Orthodox tradition and we attend their local St. Peter’s yearly fundraiser event (good food & fellowship).

Just be on the lookout for the FBI informants! ;-)

https://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/united-states-fbi-accused-spying-traditional-catholics-80149

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/judiciary-committee-uncovers-multiple-fbi-field-offices-coordinated-prepare


174 posted on 11/08/2023 3:30:39 PM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Drago

Just be on the lookout for the FBI informants! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A little late to worry about that now, they probably have a dossier on me with as many pages as the KJV! My good friend who lives in Florida, retired law enforcement and FBI contract agent, trained all the Ushers at his church on proper procedure in the event they’re invaded by local lunatics during the liturgy. Couple of years ago he and I visited the Orthodox monasteries at Meteora in Greece. Awesome!


175 posted on 11/08/2023 4:50:23 PM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (Current POPE and POTUS: corrupt, ignorant, paranoid, angry, deeply hateful, and deeply despised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson